District Judge Gareth Webb Should Have Stopped Ad
Hoc’s Racism. Instead He Aided, Abetted and Allowed
Ad Hoc’s Racism to Continue – Instead of Serving
Justice His Judgement is a Crime.

That is a Main Reason Why I Have Been Compelled to Create this Website.

If you’re black, you’re treated more harshly by the criminal
justice system than if you’re white.

Theresa May MP
Former Prime Minister of the UK

British Courts are biased against different types of people – not just black minorities
like myself. For example, as is the case with Ad Hoc and myself, the court is biased
in favour of the interests of the property owning class in society that Ad Hoc
represents. I do not necessarily believe race based discrimination is the main root
cause of why DJ Gareth Webb ruled in favour of Ad Hoc but his ruling most
definitely aided , abetted and perpetuated Ad Hoc’s racism towards me.

A U.K. Court Ordering Me to
Pay Racist Ad Hoc’s £12,855
Court Costs Does Not Faze
Me In The Least

What lies below is a rough draft of part of a book about
racists that I plan to have ghost written, ….

This is Harriet ‘The World Should Revolve Around My Lardarse’ Grove.

She is a Narcissistic Shit Stirrer Racist Piece of Shit.

If Not for Her Trailer Trash Racist Scumbag Behaviour None of What is Detailed Here Would Have Ever Happened.

The Likes of Harriet Grove are Like an Infectious Cancer - Because of Her Train-wreck Personality Both Her and Everyone Around Her Ends Up Suffering in One Way or the Other.

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TAKE MY WORD FOR IT - THE TRANSCRIPT SHOWING BELOW PROVES THIS POINT.

This is a transcript of an aggressive confrontation that Harriet Grove (HG) instigated against me while I was simply going about peacefully minding my own business.

I DISTINCTLY REMEMBER WANTING TO LEAVE THE KITCHEN SO AS TO GET AWAY FROM THIS RACIST PIECE OF GARBAGE. HARRIET GROVE FOLLOWED ME HALF THE WAY BACK TO MY ROOM WHILE CALLING ME AN ‘ARSEHOLE.

I believe it was HG herself that created a ‘note on kitchen door’ system whereby each time a guardian empties a bin she/he could print their name on the door to publicly register when she/he emptied a kitchen bin. At the time in question six guardians were using the kitchen bins and therefore six guardians were obligated to endeavour to empty the kitchen bins. On the day that HG instigated her aggressive confrontation that is represented by the transcript below, the note on the kitchen door, a copy of which is showing above, indicated that of the last six times any guardian had emptied a bin, I had emptied bins four times. The entirety of the note actually indicated that of the last 17 times any guardian had emptied a bin I had emptied bins a whooping eight times. Put in other words, HG by looking at the note on the kitchen door was very aware of the fact that I was emptying kitchen bins way more than her and every other guardian. Despite that, as proved by the transcript, HG went ahead and aggressively demanded that I empty the bins at her racist command.

Gluttonous Lardasse Harriet Grove in Her Garish Cheap-looking Polyester Clothes Should Not Be A Racist.

I do not have the words to describe how much of an offence it is to me to have racist Harriet Grove falsely accuse me of being a dirty person that other guardians have to clean up after. To have this piece of garbage HG say this to me makes my blood boil. On the day HG demanded that I empty bins at her command, the aforementioned note on the kitchen door that HG was looking at, proved that I was cleaning up after HG’s smelly narcissistic racist trailer trash fat arse, not the other way round!

In the transcript below she admitted that instead of living her own life and leaving me to live mine she has been stalking me. I do not stalk but I have noticed a few things. There is a reason why Harriet Grove is an overweight lardarse who is almost as wide as she is tall. Harriet Grove has chosen a gluttonous lifestyle of cooking, baking and eating, eating and eating some more and that is why she is so fucking fat. Harriet Grove is a narcissistic gluttonous lardarse smelly trailer trash racist. HG looks dirty. Every time I see HG in her cheap gaudy polyester clothes I feel the urge to throw up.

One of the things that amazes me about racism is that the likes of HG are also racists. The saying ‘Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones’ exists for a fucking reason. In this case I am applying this saying to the notion that no person should subject anyone to racism but in particular an overeating overweight lardasse who wears cheap-looking garish polyester clothes and looks dirty most definitely should not be a racist because such a person ought to realise that her/his obvious flaws should be cause for her/ him to not dare criticize others. However, here we are, it is as if Harriet Grove thinks,

‘It does not matter that I am a smelly overeating overweight gluttonous lardasse trailer trash who dresses in shitty garish cheap-looking polyester clothes. It makes sense for me to harass a black person because being a white person means all my flaws can be ignored.

Wherever I am it never ever crosses my mind that I need to dominate/harass people that I come into contact with. On the contrary I am always ready to be kind and considerate to all that I come in contact with - this aligns with me emptying the bins so much more than other guardians without complaining about others not emptying bins. The likes of narcissistic idiotic Harriet Grove however find themselves amongst others and decide they have what it takes to appoint themselves the boss of everyone else. It is surreal to me that the likes of Harriet Grove would find herself in a situation where she is in proximity with someone like me and decide that she can dominate me. Fuck no! This is like a really bad comedy.

This piece of garbage Harriet Grove - instead of going about her life and leaving me to live my life in peace - decides that falsely accusing me of being a dirty person that others needs to clean up after and ordering me to empty bins is a good idea! Doing that is a big fucking mistake! She thinks poking the bear that I am is a good idea! She thinks that threatening to get me in trouble with Trina Lewis is a good idea. Trina Lewis cannot protect herself from me! And yet Harriet Grove thinks she can employ Trina Lewis to threaten me. I do not fucking think so!

Trailer Trash Like Trina Lewis and Harriet Grove Need to Get Out More

Maybe trailer trash racists like Trina Lewis and Harriet Grove are so used to dealing with weak willed intellectually challenged men they assume that all men are like that. Fuck no! Trina Lewis and Harriet Grove need to get out more. I have robustly gone head to head with idiotic biased MPs and judges and not backed down. The notion that I will be intimidated by trailer trash racist Harriet Grove threatening to report me to her fellow trailer trash racist Trina Lewis is laughable. Really!

Harriet Grove believes she qualifies to harass and discriminate against me because she sees herself as being so awesome and white. I see a bargain basement lowlife overeating overweight trailer trash dumdarse in shitty clothes who ought to be the last person who should ever think it is a good idea to confront me.

I would like to thank Harriet Grove for providing such rich content for the aforementioned book that I plan to publish.

Harriet Grove's Racism Towards Me Was Very Much Like Spousal Abuse
Just Like How Trina Lewis Abuses Her Husband?

THIS IS TRINA LEWIS.

Because she is a racist she first falsely accused me of being aggressive. Because that is what racist caucasians do to innocent black people. Then she issued me with a formal warning. All Trina Lewis has to do to prove she is not a racist is simply justify why she gave me a formal warning. It has been over two years and trailer trash racist scum of the earth Trina Lewis has steadfastly refused to justify why she gave me that formal warning. She is too much of a cowardly racist to simply admit that she was wrong to falsely accuse me of being aggressive and wrong to issue me with that formal warning.

TRINA LEWIS IS A RACIST.
TRINA LEWIS IS VILE, REPREHENSIBLE &
REPULSIVE

THIS IDIOT TRINA LEWIS THAT IS SUPPOSED TO
MANAGE GUARDIANS IS GROSSLY INCOMPETENT
AND OBVIOUSLY DUMB AS DOG SHIT

Instead of being allowed anywhere near people she should have a job like working on a poultry farm plucking feathers off dead chicken.

This transcript proves that HG subjected me to another aggressive confrontation because she was taking advantage of what TL said about how it was acceptable for her to act aggressively towards me as long as her conduct was similar to how TL abuses her own husband. During this incident HG actually threatened me by saying

‘I’ll tell TL if you do not empty the bins’

This was HG deliberately aiming to have me evicted. I think Ad Hoc and its lawyers deliberately excluded that threat from the transcript.

Because Harriet Grove is a Racist Guess Who She Did
NOT Command to Empty Bins?

At the time this racist scum Harriet Grove decided to command me to empty the bins there was a caucasian guardian living in Kenwith Lodge called Tiffany. I cannot remember her ever emptying any bin - I cannot recall ever seeing Tiffany’s name on the note above. Did I view this as justification to command Tiffany to empty bins? No! Did I view this as justification for me to follow Tiffany as she is returning to her room while calling her an ‘arsehole’? Absolutely not! Nor did Harriet Grove subject this Tiffany to such aggressive harassment. Instead Harriet Grove subjected a black guardian, me to such aggressive behaviour because she is a scumbag rabid racist. It did not matter that I emptied bins much more than Tiffany and every other guardian. Harriet Grove decided I deserved such treatment because she is a racist and Trina Lewis had pretty much granted her permission to subject me to such aggression.

Ad Hoc’s “Let’s Hope the Judge is As Racist As We Are’
Evidence

For Centuries Black People Have Forever Suffered and Survived the Disease of Racism of Racist Scumbags Like Smelly Harriet Grove. What Does Not Kill Me Makes Me Stronger.

The transcript that is showing above is 100% rock solid proof that Harriet Grove is trailer trash racist scum who decided to deliberately and aggressively discriminate against a black flatmate of hers. The fact that Ad Hoc submitted this transcript to court as what it believes is evidence of my bad behaviour and not HG’s bad behaviour is both proof of Ad Hoc’s desperate racism and proof that Ad Hoc and HG were working hand in hand with each other to subject me to racism - and this has been going on for over two years. That is why I call this transcript Ad Hoc’s “Let’s Hope the Judge is As Racist As We Are’ evidence.

This transcript is not evidence of my bad behaviour at all. It is evidence that Simon Wright is breathtaking unintelligent, grossly incompetent and rabidly racist.

According to Ad Hoc, caucasian Harriet Grove, who aggressively confronted me and insisted that I, a black guardian, that empties bins WAY MORE THAN ALL OTHER GUARDIANS, should empty the bins even more is not at fault. It is the black person who refused to obey the racist Harriet Grove that is at fault and deserves to be evicted.

Imagine How Desperately Racist and Idiotic Ad Hoc Is To Submit This Transcript To Court As Proof It Is NOT
Discriminating Against Me

I fail to see how any reasonably intelligent and unbiased person that reads this transcript will not conclude that Ad Hoc and Harriet Grove were collaborating to discriminate against me. The level of desperate racism and idiocy that caused Ad Hoc to present this evidence to court as proof it is not discriminating against me is breathtaking and surreal to me. It is great content for the book I will publish.

Ad Hoc’s Scraping the Bottom of the Barrel Type
Desperate Racism

Ad Hoc prepared over 300 pages of documents in an effort to get me evicted in court. Guess how many pages were presented as proof that I deserve to be evicted because I had supposedly behaved badly? Two pages. Guess what those two pages are? The two pages that detail the transcript included here!

And Ad Hoc’s lawyers sent me three copies of these documents - 900 fucking pages! 900 pages to evict a black guardian that they very well know has done absolutely nothing wrong. Harriet Grove and Nick Martin are not being evicted below I have detailed several provable incidents of Harriet Grove and Nick Martin’s aggression towards me.

What Ad Hoc Should Have Done If It Were Not So Racist

As soon as Ad Hoc became aware of HG’s aggressive discrimination that is evidenced by this transcript it should have been screaming at Harriet Grove to stop harassing me! It should have been asking HG to explain why she was harassing me again - especially after, about a year earlier, I had accused her and Ad Hoc of subjecting me to racism.

Simon Wright is like a deer caught in headlights moron of a racist. He might be the most grossly incompetent U.K. wide operations manager in the country. The buck stops with Simon Wright. This transcript was submitted to court because of Simon Wright’s rabid racism and gross incompetence.

I would not trust SW to properly manage taking a dog for a walk. There are , say, teenagers working checkout points at super markets that are not racist and competent enough to not handle this matter the way SW is mishandling this matter. Because Simon Wright is a racist he chose to aid and abet the racism of his fellow Ad Hoc employees Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson.

The Transcript is Evidence of One of Several Collaborative Acts of Racism That Ad Hoc, Harriet Grove & Nick Martin Acts Subjected Me to Between
2021 and 2024

It has been over two years since Ad Hoc has been VERY INTENTIONALLY encouraging/giving two guardians, Harriet Grove and Nick Martin, permission to subject me to racial discrimination. In August 2023, I, again, complained to Ad Hoc about its racism. That caused Ad Hoc to demand that I vacate the room where I pay Ad Hoc to live. As a matter of principle, I was never ever going to acquiesce to the demands of racists - I refused to vacate and that led Ad Hoc asked a court for legal permission to evict me. Because British society is not really against racism the court acknowledged that Ad Hoc was subjecting me to racism but ruled in favour of Ad Hoc anyway. The court gave Ad Hoc permission to evict me and asked me to pay Ad Hoc’s court costs of £12,855. The £12,855 does not faze me - I think I will earn much more than this from people wanting to read about Ad Hoc’s racism.

I Stopped Bothering About Cleaning Because of Collaborative Racism of Ad Hoc, Nick Martin & Harriet Grove

If in return for emptying bins so much more than other guardians I am subjected to aggressive racism of the likes of Harriet Grove and Ad Hoc why the heck should I bother at all with cleaning. And when I stopped bothering that affected other guardians. Cancerous narcissistic people like Harriet Grove always end up harming themselves and all within their proximity.

Not Fazed By £12855

And then, because in my opinion, British justice can be tantamount to aiding and abetting crime, the court completely ignored overwhelming evidence that proves Ad Hoc has been subjecting me to racism. Subsequently, the court gave Ad Hoc permission to evict me and ordered that I pay Ad Hoc’s court costs of £12855. q

I Actually Feel Sorry For These Five Racists

I am the one being subjected to adverse conditions as result of the racism of these five people. That includes the court judgement that I should both be evicted and pay Ad Hoc £12855. Despite that I actually feel sorry for these five racists. I mean these are people that seem to not be able to live without going out of their way to cause harm through racism. That is so sad and pathetic. These are people that are so dumb they cannot avoid becoming people named as racists in a book about racism. Some people really are so stupid they need to be protected from themselves. These five racists - Harriet Grove, Nick Martin, Trina Lewis m Paul Thomson and Simon Wright - are such breathtakingly stupid racist. Take Harriet Grove, she simply cannot live her life without wanting to cause me harm by threatening to get me in trouble if I do not obey her command to empty bins. How evil is that!

A U.K. Court Ordering Me to Pay Racist Ad Hoc’s £12,855 Court Costs Does Not Faze Me In The Least

What lies below is a rough draft of part of a book about racists that I plan to have ghost written, ….

Brazen Racism at Property Owned By B Corporation Multinational Firm

The matter described below details three years long racism that I am being subjected to by Ad Hoc – at the former St. Christopher’s School site at Westbury Park Bristol BS6 7JE. Ad Hoc rents out rooms/flats at the former St. Christopher’s School on behalf of a B Corporation multinational firm. A firm achieves B Corporation status after going through a vigorous process requiring applicants to provide evidence of socially and environmentally responsible practices relating to, amongst other aspects, worker compensation, diversity and corporate transparency.

Being in any way shape or form connected to brazen and gratuitously inflicted racism ought to be an anathema to what a B Corporation practices and represent.

As summarised below a few weeks ago a U.K. court ruled that in return for my racist licensor/landlord, a multinational company called Ad Hoc, having subjected me to racism for over three years Ad Hoc’s application to evict me has been granted AND I am to pay racist Ad Hoc’s court costs of £12,855. Because I, again, complained to Ad Hoc about its three years long racism that it was subjecting me to, in retaliation it (Ad Hoc) asked me to vacate the room that I pay to live in. Tucking my tail between my legs and meekly vacating Ad Hoc’s room was never an option for me - I will NEVER EVER meekly acquiesce to the demands of an entity that is subjecting me to racism. Never! Even when such a racist entity threatens me with court action. Losing in court against a racist entity and the possibility of having to pay £10,000s in court costs to such an entity like Ad Hoc is a risk that I consciously decided to take. The possibility of a court demanding that I pay Ad Hoc tens of £10,000 court costs simply does not faze me one bit - what fazes me is the possibility of not being able to look myself in the mirror because of having let myself be intimidated by the likes of racist Ad Hoc.

I plan to ask a professional writer to ghost write a book about racists that I have had the misfortune of encountering over the past decades. I have had enough adversarial encounters that can best be interpreted as being racism based to fill a book. These tens of encounters include experiences with racist police officers, a bank, a gym, a judge and an ombudsman - enough encounters to fill a book.. This is a very rough draft of Ad Hoc’s racism that will be a part of what will be in such a book. I suspect that as is the case with most people writing about painful personal experiences is distressful and that does not help the quality of the writing. Furthermore, I do not like to write. Despite that, especially if you are inclined to read what lies below in its entirety, what I have written here is wholly understandable. But it is far from perfect writing, I often make the same point more than once, it needs editing etc.

Different sections of what I have written relates to both racism in general and Ad Hoc’s racism. I have done my best to arrange and layout these sections so that there is a ‘logical flow’. Of course, you might want to jump to particular sections in order to become quicker acquainted with why I am accusing Ad Hoc of racism. ​

AD HOC BELIEVES A BLACK PERSON CANNOT BE INNOCENT

‘If a Black Person is Involved Then She/He Must Be One of the Guilty Parties’

is how racists like Ad Hoc’s employees, Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright think.

I Challenge Any Unbiased Reasonably Intelligent Person to Become Acquainted with the Incontrovertible Evidence that I Present Below and NOT Become Absolutely Disgusted at Ad Hoc’s Over Three Years of Subjecting Me To Continuous Racism.​

A Racist Threatened My Life and Called Me A Black C**t - The Police Let the Racist Off Scott Free But Gave Me A Warning

In, I believe September or October 2018, while living at, I believe the address was, 240 Newport Road Cardiff CF24 1RR, I had a living arrangement similar to my present Ad Hoc arrangement. One of the other persons living in a room in the same building with me was a caucasian man called John Paul Clift (JPC). Before the day he launched a racist attack against me he and I had never ever exchange a single word of conversation - we had also never ever had any kind of negative altercation. There had been no interaction whatsoever between him and I. Other tenants in the building informed me that he had recently been released from prison and he informed others that he plans to commit suicide. One day, at about 4am he proceeded to start banging on my door screaming for me to come out because he wanted to kill me. He sounded as if he was on the other side of the door waiting to strike me with a deadly weapon. While doing this he kept calling me a 'Black cunt!'. I recorded this verbal race based hate crime on my telephone. Naturally,I called the police about four police officers arrived. I explained to the officers what I had been told about JPC - I reiterated that I afraid he might kill me and then commit suicide. There was absolutely no evidence whatsoever of any wrongdoing on my part - all other people living in the building also let the police officers know that they were no aware of any wrongdoing on my part. Despite my total innocence these police officers proceeded to subject me to what is a second race based hate crime. Namely, they listened to the recording of JPC screaming racial insults at me, they listened to him threatening to kill me, claimed they could not hear anything incriminating , refused to arrest JPC, refused to accept that I was most definitely being put in danger because this supposedly suicidal person might kill me just before committing suicide and then a Police Sergeant 3619 Cocksey gave me a verbal warning! I am fully aware of the possible legal consequences of falsely accusing a person of racism. In correspondent I subsequently sent to the police I repeatedly accused this Cocksey of being a racist and let him know I am willing to state this in open court. He never responded to my accusation.

For Over Three Years, Three Ad Hoc Employees, in Conjunction with Two Guardians, Have Subjected Me to Racism that Features Certain Aspects that are Quite Similar to What I Went Through With These Racist Cardiff Police Officers.

THE 2021 ROOT CAUSE OF THIS COURT ACTION

This matter was engendered by and is rooted in how in 2021 a complaint that I filed with Ad Hoc that centred around how two caucasian guardians, Harriet Grove & Nick Martin, had been harassing me resulted, mainly, in Harriet Grove being totally absolved of her 100% indisputable culpability while I , the 100% innocent person was falsely accused of being aggressive and then bizarrely issued with an Ad Hoc formal warning called a Letter of Concern.

……………….

This is Harriet ‘The World Must Revolve Around Me’ Grove.

She is a Narcissistic Sh*t Stirrer Racist.

If Not for Her Trailer Trash Racist Scumbag Behaviour None of What is Detailed Here Would Have Ever Happened.

The Likes of Harriet Grove are Like an Infectious Cancer - Because of Her Train-wreck Personality Both Her and Everyone Around Her Ends Up Suffering in One Way or the Other.

……………….

Eventually, over the following period of almost three years this has had two predictable effects

Two Predictable Effects of this Racism

My relationship with Ad Hoc is, fundamentally, akin to that of a tenant and landlord. In response to me asking Ad Hoc for help, out of the blue, Ad Hoc falsely accused me of being aggressive and then issued me with a formal warning. That is vile discrimination and it is unlawful. Ad Hoc subjecting me, a black person, to such discrimination can best be characterised as racism. When I was issued with that formal warning I repeatedly let Ad Hoc know that the discriminatory manner in which, I ,the innocent person had been given a warning while culpable HG had been completely let off was likely to have two main effects.

First Predictable Effect of That Unjust Formal Warning

The formal warning that I received is causing me significant distress. This is contributing to my having to seek medical care and take time off work. Presently, this is the third time I have had to take time off work so as to attempt to cope with the mental distress of Ad Hoc’s racism.

Second Predictable Effect of That Unjust Formal Warning: Akin To Persecution by
Two Guardians and Two Ad Hoc Employees

Over the past period of almost three years both Harriet Grove and Nick Martin have been emboldened to subject me to further repeated acts of harassment/aggression in a manner that proves they are taking advantage of the fact that they know that Ad Hoc is clearly biased against me and biased in their favour. These acts of harassment/aggression from this duo are brazen. Over about two years, each time I complained to Ad Hoc about these acts, and provided evidence of such acts, I have been informed that I am partially to blame for this or been informed that I am the cause of the aggression I had been subjected to! Over the past three years the overall effect of this is that I am being subjected to the equivalent of being persecuted by two guardians, NM and HG, together with two Ad Hoc employees, TL and PT. It does not matter if some or all of these four people did not actually consciously decide to collaborate together to subject me to what is akin to persecution, the effect of what I am being subjected to is almost identical to what one would expect if such a conscious collaboration did exist. In actuality, certain aspects of this matter very much are akin to Ad Hoc/TL actively collaborating with HG and NM to continue to harass me.

Over Two Years of Me Simply and Robustly Conducting Myself With the Aim of Wanting to Simply Be Left Alone to Live in Peace …. Three Years of Me Never Ever Provoking Anyone … Three Years of Being Forced to Repeatedly React Against Aggression and Provocation…. In Particular the Provocation and Aggression of a Bonafide Racist Imbecile Called Nick Martin

Over Two Years of Being Dragged Down to the Brainless Trailer Trash Level of the Racists Trina Lewis, Harriet Grove and Nick Martin. I would liken this three year long period of being subjected to Ad Hoc’s racism to wanting to live my life in peace with a modicum of class and dignity but instead of that here I am being dragged down to the level of trailer trash racists Trina Lewis, Harriet Grove and Nick Martin. These are people who I view as the absolute dregs of society because racists are amongst the worst in society.

The First Thing Ad Hoc Should Do If It Hopes To Prove It Is Not Racist Is To Justify Why It……

… issued me, and not Harriet Grove, with a warning. If it fails to do that then absolutely everything else Ad Hoc states with regards to this matter should be taken with an enormous dose of scepticism.

Ad Hoc’s Over Two Years Long Racist Modus Operandi - Cause
Aggressive Provocation & Cherrypick Evidence

There are laws against discrimination in the U.K. A landlord/licensor giving a tenant/licensee a formal warning for no justifiable reason is discrimination and in the U.K. that is unlawful. For over three years Ad Hoc has adopted the stance that it does not have to justify its conduct towards me. No matter how many times, over three years, I have asked, Ad Hoc has never ever come close to credibly justifying why it issued me with that Letter of Concern formal warning. Furthermore, it has never ever really indicated that it is obligated to provide me with such justification - it most definitely is so obligated. Especially since Ad Hoc refuses to explain its conduct towards me I shall put forward an explanation of what I believe is an aspect of Ad Hoc’s discrimination towards me that is particularly vile. As soon as Trina Lewis commenced falsely accusing me of being aggressive towards others I quite easily proved that her accusation is false, see below for detail of this. In the over three years period since then I believe Ad Hoc decided that obtaining evidence of my aggression was a top priority. Even if that meant blood might be spilt, see below for detail. I believe Ad Hoc adopted this plan because it hopes it will be able to cherrypick evidence and state,

‘Here is evidence of him being aggressive. It proves we were right when we accused him of aggression back in 2021.’

Cherrypick as in it hopes that all the overwhelming evidence, summarised below - that proves, that over a period of over three years, it is Ad Hoc itself that has repeatedly very deliberately created an atmosphere that is bound to cause me to react against repeated acts of aggressive provocation by Nick Martin and Harriet Grove - will be ignored. One such piece of cherrypicked evidence centres around the ‘Empty the Bins of I Will Tell Trina’ incident that I aptly call the

‘Let’s Hope the Judge is As Racist As We Are’ Defence.

Both Paul Thomson And Trina Lewis Were Happy to See Blood Spilt Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson ignored the fact that Nick Martin’s aggression had caused me to be scalded with boiling hot tea. They also ignored the fact that it could not have been anyone else but NM who had caused me to be deliberately physically assaulted with a chair. Instead of employing the authority they have as Ad Hoc employees to deescalate the powder keg incendiary atmosphere that they themselves had very deliberately created they , instead, kept ignoring NM’s aggression even though it was clear that that could lead to a physical assault that could result in someone’s blood being spilt.

The only reason why NM’s blood was not spilt - the only reason why I, a person that has the broken bones to show for when I used to work as a nightclub bouncer, did not knock NM’s teeth down his throat - is because I am not aggressive. In fact, I am probably able to - not - react in kind when subjected to repeated acts of provocation/aggression more than most people.

Despite the belief of Ad Hoc’s racists, Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson, being black does not automatically mean being aggressive.

I can most definitely envision an aggressive person that does not have my high level of self-control being caused to snap as a result of Nick Martin’s - THREE YEARS LONG - relentless provocative aggression with that causing that aggressive person to knock Nick Martin’s teeth down his imbecilic racist throat.

Nick Martin is Begging for Someone to Do Him Serious Bodily Harm

Below I have summarised some but not all, of the different acts of aggression and provocation that Harriet Grove and Nick Martin have been subjecting me to over a period of more than three years. Ad Hoc’s Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson steadfastly refused to do anything substantial to both acknowledge said aggression/provocation and stop it. I challenge any reasonable and unbiased person to become acquainted with what I went through with Nick Martin and not reach the conclusion that Nick Martin is absolutely begging for someone to beat him within an inch of his life. I have proved that that someone will not be me.

Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson were most definitely using Nick Martin as bait in a racist ploy to retrospectively prove that I am a typically aggressive black person.

Interpretation of the incontrovertible evidence presented below proves that Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson would have loved for me to physically assault Nick Martin. However for a number of reasons - including the fact that I simply do not believe in physical violence - I have denied these racists TL & PT the pleasure of having evidence that proves I am aggressive. I can so easily see a situation with a person whose life is more ‘conducive’ to the notion of deciding that beating Nick Martin to within an inch of his life and putting him in a wheelchair for life is worth doing the time in prison. And with this being the U.K. a prison term for putting someone in a wheelchair for life might not be as much as a decade - that might be a worthwhile prison sentence to teach a scumbag racist like Nick Martin a lesson. However, my life is not such a life.

Imagine that, Nick Martin ending up in a wheelchair for life is the price paid for Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson being able to say

‘See, forget that we accused him of being aggressive before there was any evidence whatsoever that he is aggressive and forget that it was us ourselves that over a period of three years created a powder keg incendiary atmosphere that eventually caused him to snap and cause so much physical grievous harm to Nick Martin to the extent that he is now confined to a wheelchair , what is more important is the fact that we were right to accuse him of being a typically aggressive black person’.

The evidence is unassailable and it screams,

Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson are racists. And they are a danger to themselves and people around them.

They also represent veritable proof of the validity of Cipolla’s 3rd Basic Law of Stupidity which states the following,

A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.

The aforementioned book will include photographs of the five racists mentioned below. Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson thought their discrimination towards me was only ever going to cause me harm. In the long run let’s see who pays more of a price for how Ad Hoc is evicting me now. Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson are tremendously stupid racists that are causing themselves significant self-harm and they so easily could have caused Nick Martin serious bodily harm.

I Am Publicly Accusing these Ad Hoc Employees of Being Racists TRINA LEWIS - an Ad Hoc recruiter - is a truly vile and reprehensible racist. Her silence; her refusal to explain her conduct screams ‘Racist!’.

PAUL THOMSON - an Ad Hoc branch manager - is a racist. As shown below, his own words prove that he has self-certified himself as a racist. Paul Thomson is a bonafide intellectually challenged incompetent fool.

SIMON WRIGHT - Ad Hoc’s UK Operations Director - is a racist and a liability to Ad Hoc’s brand. Having stated that, because so far Ad Hoc has shown itself to be robustly racist, Simon Wright’s racism could be viewed as him being ‘on brand’.

I Am Publicly Accusing these Ad Hoc Guardians of Being Racists HARRIET GROVE is a narcissistic racist. Below, read her own words to discover she is not just narcissistic but pathetically narcissistic.

NICK MARTIN is a racist and a bonafide imbecile. Below, to read NM’s own words is to be convinced that he is a veritable imbecile.

…… Racism is a Disease that Causes Minorities Like Myself Cradle to Grave Significant Harm. Trina Lewis, Harriet Grove, Nick Martin , Paul Thomson and Simon Wright are perfect embodiments of the disease that is racism. ……
In particular ….. I think Trina Lewis and Harriet Grove and immediately think trailer trash inbred racist scum of the earth

This is Trina Lewis.

She is Trailer Trash Racist Scum.

For three years she has had every opportunity to stop subjecting me to racism. Because she is a rabid racist she refuses to stop.

Racism is a disease.

Trina Lewis is perfect personification of the disease that is racism.

Trina Lewis is a disease.

This Communication Presents Proof of Ad Hoc’s Over Two Years Long Racism Towards Me. The Very Same Racism that a Court Perversely Refused to Take Into Consideration

As retaliation because I complained about Ad Hoc’s racism, Ad Hoc applied to a court for permission to evict me. What is detailed below is evidence of Ad Hoc’s racism that the court, shockingly, and apparently legally, refused to take into consideration. Below I have summarised why I question whether the legal reason the court cited for - not - taking evidence of Ad Hoc’s racism into consideration is legal or not.

This is Simon Wright, He is a Racist. He is Also Grossly Incompetent.

What is Happening Here Was So Avoidable. But Solely Because Simon
Wright is a Racist and Grossly Incompetent Here We Are.
Simon Wright is a Liability to Ad Hoc’s Brand.

‘This is Simon Wright.
He is a Racist.

He is Also Grossly Incompetent.

What is Happening Here Was So Avoidable. But Solely Because Simon Wright is a Racist and Grossly Incompetent Here We Are.

Simon Wright is a Liability to Ad Hoc’s Brand.

Simon Wright stated this absolute falsehood - to impart the full legal implications of the fact Simon Wright is perjuring himself this much of his quote needs to be published,

“23. In September 2023, Simon Wright , the Claimant’s U.K. Operations Director, considered a formal complaint made by the Defendant , and undertook an extensive investigation. He declined to uphold the complaint that there had been any direct and indirect discrimination. A copy of the letter dated 15 September 2023 is attached to this Reply at Appendix 1.

24. In the premises the Claimant denies that it has discriminated against the Defendant under the Equality Act 2010 or at all

25, The Claimant reserves the right to respond further to any properly particularised allegations and defence.

25, The Claimant reserves the right to respond further to any properly particularised allegations and defence.

Statement of Truth

The Claimant believes that the facts stated in this Reply are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes , or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without a honest belief in its truth.
I am duly authorised by the Claimant to sign this statement.”

(Signed by Simon Wright and dated 7/12/23)

As demonstrated/summarised below Simon Wright never ever came close to conscientiously investigating my complaint. The complaint that I submitted to Ad Hoc detailed evidence of actions that transpired over a period of over two years. Despite that Simon Wright reached the conclusion of not upholding my complaint within a matter of no more than a few hours/one or two days. What Simon Wright did is simply blindly aid and abet the race based discriminatory stance of his subordinates, Trina Lewis & Paul Thomson, by NOT investigating the basis of my complaint.

The Statement of Truth that Simon Wright signed and submitted to court is a veritable act of wilful perjury.

I dare Simon Wright to take action against me for calling him a racist.

The Fact that Simon Wright is a Racist Starts with His Refusal To Answer these 3 Questions

Question 1:
Why after I filed a complaint in 2021 was caucasian Harriet Grove completely and totally absolved of the provable fact that she had violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8? She violated clause 5.8 because she had been harassing me and that is why I filed the aforementioned complaint.

Question 2:
Why, in relation to the same complaint, was I, a minority black person, falsely accused of being aggressive and then issued with a Letter of Concern formal warning?

Question 3:
Why, in relation to the same complaint, was I, a minority black person, falsely accused of being aggressive and then issued with a Letter of Concern formal warning while caucasian Harriet Grove was completely and totally absolved of the provable fact that she had violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8?

The basis of why I am also accusing Ad Hoc employees , Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson , of being racists also commences from this duo’s steadfast refusal, over the last three years to, similar to Simon Wright, to answer these same three questions.

FOUR SEQUENTIAL STAGES THAT FITS THE RACISM OF TRINA LEWIS, PAUL THOMSON & SIMON WRIGHT

Decades of painful experiences has resulted in my having deduced that racists tend go about their racism in a way that often looks like a pattern that all racists follow. It is as if the racists Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright are following the same Racists’ Playbook. That pattern has the following parts that are manifested in the following sequential order

A.
** Presence of Indisputable Discrimination. A minority like myself is subjected to discrimination that most definitely is discrimination.

This is what Ad Hoc’s Paul Thomson said when I complained about having been issued with a formal warning even though I have done nothing wrong,

“In incidents such as these we find from experience that it is very rare that one person is completely blameless and has not engaged in any of the behaviours stated in the above clause.”

As retaliation because I complained about Ad Hoc’s racism, Ad Hoc applied to a court for permission to evict me. What is detailed below is evidence of Ad Hoc’s racism that the court, shockingly, and apparently legally, refused to take into consideration. Below I have summarised why I question whether the legal reason the court cited for - not - taking evidence of Ad Hoc’s racism into consideration is legal or not.

B.
 ** The Indisputable Discrimination Can Credibly Be Characterised As Racism.The discrimination also, objectively and credibly, can be viewed as race based. It is almost always the case that the person dishing out the discrimination will totally refuse to acknowledge what any unbiased reasonable person will acknowledge is definitely discrimination. The flip side of that is that the only person that is putting forth the most credible explanation of the nature of the discrimination is the minority that is at the receiving end of the discrimination.

As retaliation because I complained about Ad Hoc’s racism, Ad Hoc applied to a court for permission to evict me. What is detailed below is evidence of Ad Hoc’s racism that the court, shockingly, and apparently legally, refused to take into consideration. Below I have summarised why I question whether the legal reason the court cited for - not - taking evidence of Ad Hoc’s racism into consideration is legal or not.

C.
** Perpetrator of Discrimination Flat Out Refuses to Admit Being Responsible for the Discrimination. Despite the fact that denying the actuality of the discrimination is completely and totally ridiculously the perpetrator of the discrimination will deny that any discrimination is taking place. Let alone ever considering that the discrimination might be race based discrimination. There is a whole ecosystem of people out there that will deny that racism or racism related things exist until they are blue in the face. The former governor of The State of Carolina in the USA, a Nikki Haley, has a significant chance of becoming the next president of America. The Civil War in the USA was fought over the right to continue with the system of slavery. ‘Everyone and her dog in America knows this simple fact. Despite that when Nikki Haley was asked what caused the Civil War she flat out refused to say that war had anything to do with slavery. And then she stated that America has never been a racist country! An American senator called Tim Scott also claimed America has never been a racist country. What makes this even more shocking is the fact that both Nikki Haley and Time Scott are black. It is believed that Nikki Haley passes herself off as white because she does not look like a ‘typical’ black person - her parents are from the Indian continent and she got rid of her birth name of Nimarata Randhawa and started calling herself ‘Nikki Haley’. If people like these two black politicians are willing to to make a complete international arse of themselves by claiming something as ridiculous as ‘America has never been a racist country’ you can bet your last dollar on the fact that racist caucasians like Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright will steadfastly deny that their own racism is in fact racism.

Please take a look at Documents B1, B2 & B3 showing below. With regards to when TL issued me with that formal warning she had enough to say with regards to what she sees as my bad behavior and why I deserved the warning. However, as shown by these documents, she has never ever managed to utter a single word to explain/justify why she issued me with that warning. Her inability to explain her own actions is an inability to explain her racism towards me.

D.
** Perpetrator of Racial Discrimination Decides That As Punishment For Levelling Accusation of Racism the Minority Must Suffer More Racial Discrimination This stage of the racism campaign has the perpetrator of the race based discrimination deciding that the harm done by her/his discrimination is inconsequential and the person who accused her/him of racism needs to pay a price for levelling racism accusation. This causes the perpetrator of the racism to cause the minority additional harm by subjecting her/him to more race based discrimination. The evidence that I present below proves that Ad Hoc decided to evict me simply because I complained about the racism it is subjecting me to.

What is presently happening with regards to black Metropolitan police officers is another excellent example of such retaliatory racism.

NBPA Calls for Ethnic Minorities to Boycott Joining Met Police. This pattern of a person/entity continuing to discriminate against a minority after that minority has complained about having already be subjected to race based discrimination by that person/entity is part of a widespread historical pattern of racism. It helps explain why in the 5/2/24 the online edition of the Guardian there was an article - https://tinyurl.com/4x6prjn5 - that detailed that the National Black Police Association (NBPA) is calling for ethnic minorities to boycott joining the Metropolitan Police in protest of the chair of the Met Black Police Association (Met BLA) , a Charles Ehikioya, being subjected to a ‘racist and vexatious’ misconduct investigation that came about as retaliation because he raised concern about racism that minority police officer face in the Metropolitan Police Force.

This is what racist do time and time again.

Cowardly Racists Paul Thomson and Trina Lewis Did Not Dare Turn Up In Court To Deny That They Are Racists

In the evidence that I submitted to court I very explicitly accused both Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson of being racists. I also explicitly challenged each one of them to answer a few questions if they want to prove they are not racists. Neither of them turned up in court to deny my accusation. The refusal of either of them to attend court to deny being accused of being a racist speaks volume to Thierry racist guilt. If in court anyone accused me of being a racist horses would not be able to hold be back from appearing in court in person to vociferously deny the accusation!

THIS IS TRINA LEWIS.

Because she is a racist she first falsely accused me of being aggressive. Because that is what racist caucasians do to innocent black people. Then she issued me with a formal warning. All Trina Lewis has to do to prove she is not a racist is simply justify why she gave me a formal warning. It has been over two years and trailer trash racist scum of the earth Trina Lewis has steadfastly refused to justify why she gave me that formal warning. She is too much of a cowardly racist to simply admit that she was wrong to falsely accuse me of being aggressive and wrong to issue me with that formal warning.

TRINA LEWIS IS A RACIST. TRINA LEWIS IS VILE, REPREHENSIBLE & REPULSIVE THIS IDIOT TRINA LEWIS THAT IS SUPPOSED TO MANAGE GUARDIANS IS GROSSLY INCOMPETENT AND OBVIOUSLY DUMB AS DOG SHIT

Instead of being allowed anywhere near people she should have a job like working on a poultry farm plucking feathers off dead chicken.

Since 2021 I have been - very clearly and logically - explaining why I am accusing her of being a racist. And I have employed rock solid evidence to back up my accusation. And in all that time Trina Lewis has never ever even attempted to explain why I am wrong to call her a racist. What does that tell you?

Instead, like a cowardly racist all she has ever done is falsely accuse me of being generally aggressive. That is what racists do; falsely accuse innocent black persons of being aggressive. She has not ever been able to analyse why how I have accused her of being a racist is wrong - because it is impossible to do so because the evidence of her racism, as summarised below, is simply impossible to credibly deny. That is a fact.

One of the Most Evil and Twisted Aspects of Ad Hoc’s Racism is Holding My Refusal to Accept Nick Martin’s Bogus Apology Against Me

In Document B1, shown below, TL wrote,

“…Nick did apologise ….. and you were unwilling to accept his apology”

By the time Ad Hoc’s and I were facing off in court it was obvious that my refusal to accept NM’s apology was seen as something that should be held against me - all of the people involved, including Ad Hoc’s solicitor in court, kept mentioning the fact that I did not accept his apology. First of all, no one has the right to dictate whether anyone should or should not accept an apology. Secondly, one of the reasons why I did not accept his apology is because it could not have been more obvious that his apology was completely insincere. NM’s most aggressive conduct towards me has come in the three years AFTER his supposed apology - his aggression that led to my suffering two physical assaults came AFTER his apology. What makes Ad Hoc holding my refusal to accept his apology against me most evil is the racial context. That context is the racism of giving me a formal warning while culpable Harriet Grove is completely absolved. Ad Hoc views that discrimination as something that should be glossed over. Ad Hoc does not think there is anything wrong whatsoever with that. Instead Ad Hoc thinks that what is wrong and deserving of attention is my refusal to accept NM’s apology. Why on earth would I accept an apology from NM when the complaint that I filed with Ad Hoc proves that both NM and HG - and not just NM - had violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8 by harassing me? Obsessing over me not accepting NM’s apology is also a red herring that is meant to draw attention away from the racism that resulted in HG being completely absolved

Ad Hoc’s Apology Obsession

“The Defendant refused to accept Nick Martin’s apology”​

“ Nick apologised to Shina for making comments that Shina thought were racist comments. Shina did not accept the apology”

“ …. I believe that Nick apologised for his part in the incident but that you refused his apology”

Look at how much these people are seemingly obsessing over my refusal to accept NM’s apology. Several aspects of this matter that Ad Hoc was - not - commenting about shows how egregious Ad Hoc’s conduct is in relation to this matter. For example Ad Hoc is not commenting on the several acts of aggression/provocation that I was subjected to by NM - AFTER - I refused to accept his bogus apology. Ad Hoc would rather brush all of that under the carpet because the aim is to ignore caucasian NM’s aggression and instead desperately present manufactured evidence in an attempt to make the case that is the black person, myself , that is at fault. For example, Ad Hoc is silent/ is not commenting on the following: NM pinning a ‘Grow Up’ note on my door, NM’s aggression causing me to be scalded with boiling hot tea, NM unilaterally installing a camera in the kitchen to spy on me etc.

Apart From Racism I Believe This is Also About Intolerance / Bigotry.

(A) This started with Harriet Grove angrily confronting me to tell me I should not have left an Ad Hoc Whatsapp group chat. (B) The message that Nick Martin sent to me also included him asserting I should not have left that Whatsapp group chat. (C) Nick Martin behaved as if I killed his dog when I refused to accept his apology (D) What does the ‘Grow Up’ note that NM pinned to my door mean? (E) For over two years Ad Hoc has been seemingly obsessed with talking about my not accepting NM’s apology - I believe this is because Ad Hoc thinks I am at fault for not accepting his apology. (A) through to (E) are aspects of this matter that are indicative of a group of people that are all deeply intolerant of my right to view Harriet Grove and Nick Martin as persona non grata. Because of how NM & HG behave I view them both as racists. One of a number of egregious aspects of this matter is how both Nick Martin and Harriet Grove kept being provocative/aggressive towards me because they could not countenance the reality that I simply did not want to have anything to do with either of them. Each of them, incessantly kept provoking me and Ad Hoc kept letting them get away with such provocation - this encouraged this duo to keep acting aggressively/provocatively towards me over a period of more than two years. What NM did after the tea scalding incident perfectly exemplifies this fact. A main theme of the three years long provocation of NM and HG is one of deep intolerance - the refusal of NM and HG to simply let me exist in peace without having to interact with either of them is an exercise in intolerance and bigotry. The commencement of three years of provocation from this duo included HG telling me how aggrieved she was because I had exercised my right to leave an Ad Hoc WhatsApp group - HG admonished me for doing this and let me know that my leaving proved that I , according to her, believe I am superior to other guardians. That is not true at all, I simply left because I believed that would decrease the chances of conflicts with other guardians - the present state of affairs proves me wrong. I have never not been willing to be civil towards NM and HG - but that civility was based on my right to absolutely minimise verbal exchanges with this duo. Apart from the fact that no matter what I have the right to live and not talk to whoever I choose, I was also compelled to stop talking to both of them as a result of how the aggression/provocation of this duo had resulted in Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc issuing me with the aforementioned completely unjust Letter of Concern formal warning. As summarised below, during one of the acts of aggression that HG instigated against me she pathetically and literarily complained about the fact that I had not spoken to her in months! She did this because she is such a pathetic narcissist, see below for detail. She is so narcissistic she cannot come to terms with my right to want to ignore her existence as much as possible. HG and I are two guardians that have ended up living together in the same building as a result of how Ad Hoc randomly selects guardians - we are not friends, not are we a married couple. It is alarming that HG does not know that it is completely inexcusable for her to not know that it is my absolute right to not want to talk to her unless I really have to! I think Harriet Grove is a racist and a narcissist - why on earth would I not want to avoid her like the plague!

Two years ago I had refused to accept NM’s apology because , to me, it was obviously a vacuous and insincere apology. NM’s repeated acts of aggression towards me after said ‘apology’ was issued very conclusively prove I was right to have not accepted his apology. When I refused to accept his apology at that meeting, NM reacted as if I had just killed his pet. It has become clear to me that NM simply cannot come to terms with the fact that, in the following three years after I refused to accept his apology, I do not want to have anything to do with him. I am convinced that that is why he pinned that ‘Grow up’ note on my door. My not wanting to have anything to do with him, according to him, means I am not behaving like a grown up. HG and NM might both already be in their 30s. Despite that each one of them is behaving like a toddler that cannot handle someone that does not want to be their friend. Ad Hoc is aiding and abetting the aggressive puerile behaviour of this duo. The behaviour of HG & NM is a truly pathetic way for adults to handle themselves!

Put in other words, in the over three year period after I received that unjustified Letter of Concern formal warning, both HG and NM have indicated that their egos are too fragile to be able to tolerate the fact that I had adopted the stance that they are persona non grata.

These people being intolerant of my not wanting to talk to NM and HG is also evidenced by TL and PT seeming to hold it against me that I had refused to accept NM’s apology. This is evidenced by the inordinate amount of attention that TL and PL have paid to my refusal to accept NM’s apology. All of this paints a picture of this quartet - two guardians, NM and HG, and two Ad Hoc employees, TL and PL - being intolerant of my wanting nothing to do with NM and HG.

AD HOC IS A RACIST COMPANY

For over three years, from 2021 to the present day, Ad Hoc has been subjecting me to racial discrimination - below lies incontrovertible evidence of said racism. Recently, for what might be the thirtieth time, I asked for the racial discrimination to stop. Ad Hoc retaliated by serving me with an eviction notice. As a matter of principle, the threat of retaliatory court action and the threat of having to pay £10,000s in court costs to Ad Hoc was never ever going to be enough to make me tuck my tail between my legs and simply acquiesce to Ad Hoc’s racist demands for my eviction. So, in order to be able to legally evict me Ad Hoc took me to court. Again, the threat of going head to head with Ad Hoc in court and possibly losing and having to pay Ad Hoc’s court costs of £10,000s was not enough of a threat for me to be afraid of facing Ad Hoc in court. My stance is a principled one that I am willing to pay a price for - I very much doubt if any one of the aforementioned five racists thought as far forward as possibly having to pay a price for treating me with abject discrimination. The court hearing was on 21/2/24.

The defence that Ad Hoc submitted to court included the following,

“Defendant makes various allegations that Claimant’s have discriminated against him because of his race. The Court will see that these allegations are denied”

That was Ad Hoc asserting that it has not subjected me to racism. Then the solicitor/barrister representing racist Ad Hoc said what one would expect a racist to say, ….

JAMES CASTLE
OF
TANFIELD CHAMBERS
THINKS CALLING A BLACK PERSON A NI**ER IS NOT A CRIME?

Then during the court hearing on 21/2/24 Ad Hoc’s solicitor/barrister, a James Castle of Tanfield Chambers, expressed the opinion that me, a black person, being called a ‘Ni**er!’ should not be considered a crime. To paraphrase him,

‘Calling you , a black person, a ‘Ni**er’ is not a crime’

James Castle
Tanfield Chamber

A Court that Aids, Abets and Perpetuates the Crime of Discrimination is Itself Criminal

“Why was I moved to ask the court if, in the U.K.,
a police officer really has the legal right to arrest a person that calls me, a black person, the N-word?”

Several weeks after I asked my ‘N-word’ question in court I received the transcript of just a part of what took place in that court between Ad Hoc and myself. I am not in the habit of making unintelligent arguments and so I have no doubt that my N-word question was absolutely appropriate and logical. However, this transcript is further evidence that my question is right on the money.    

  1. I then have to move on to the issue of race discrimination. Mr. Xifregas is a black man, he wishes me to take this into consideration in relation to his rights and obligations to enforce under The Equality Act. It is for that reason alone that I mention his ethnicity. The Equality Act 2010 was a piece of legislation which was designed to bring in under one legislative umbrella, all of those previous Acts that dealt with issues of discrimination. It is a statutory code to allow courts and tribunals to deal with cases of discrimination. There is no doubt that discrimination can be found in the provision of services under part 3 of the Act, the governance of premises under part 4 of the Act, including eviction from premises.  So, there is no doubt the Equality Act can cover actions between landlord and licensee or landlord and tenant. 
  1. It is necessary to identify a prohibited conduct and Mr. Xifregas states that he suffered direct discrimination, harassment and victimisation and he refers to the failure to act in relation to discriminatory acts by other residents and also the labelling him of aggressive at a very early stage in his interaction with people. He indicates that that has placed him in a significant disadvantage and was something which has affected the view of lots of people of him within the premises
  1. We have the ability to act under the Act Part 4 and we have a protected characteristic and we have a potentially actionable act, subject of course to a later factual determination, any act of discrimination being entirely denied by the claimants. The question arises do I have a statutory remedy which would allow , if I wished to do so, me to quash the notice to quit? Here I need to turn to the Equality Act 2010 and section 119 which deals with remedies,

    “This section applies if the County Court or Sheriff finds there has been a contravention of a provision referred to in section (114(1) . (2) The County Court has the power to grant any remedy which could be granted by the High Court (a) in proceedings in tort (b) on a claim of judicial review”

  1. So we have a structure. The structure of the Act differentiates between public bodies and private bodies, companies and individuals. With public bodies there is no doubt that acts of discrimination can be dealt with by a judicial review, the powers for judicial review, include the quashing of those discriminatory acts. In relation to private bodies and individuals, the structure of the legislation is set out that the remedy is in tort.  Tortious remedies do not include the power to quash previous acts. The remedy for unlawful acts on a tortious basis is the provision of damages. So if a person is wronged in a civil sense, they are perfectly entitled if they can make up the facts of that wrong to to claim damages for that wrong. They are not able to ask a court to quash a previously committed act where the torfeasor is not a public body subject to judicial review. 
  1. Xifregas is horrified by that position. He says that by the pure quirk of him having a private landlord rather than a public landlord radically reduces the remedies he has to protect himself against discriminatory acts. He may well be right in terms of that assertion but it is Parliament that sets out our laws and Parliament has created structures which differentiate between the acts of public authorities and the acts of individuals. This is not to say remedies do not exist but simply the remedy of me quashing the notice to quit is not one available to me in this case.

District Judge Gareth Webb
Bristol County Court

Put in other words, the court ruled that the case between Ad Hoc and myself is similar enough to a high court case that is known as Global 100 Ltd Vs Laleva, to the extent that District Judge Webb had no choice but to pass a judgement that mirrors the high court judgement of that case. And in Global 100 Ltd Vs Laleva the High Court ruled that if the landlord/licensor that has committed acts of discrimination, any kind of discrimination, against a

tenant/licensee is a private entity – as opposed to a public entity – said acts of discrimination can be completely ignored by the court.  

Here is a succinct summary of the context against which said judgement was passed.

I contend that evidence, including photographic evidence, that I had already submitted to court incontrovertibly proves that my landlord, Ad Hoc, the claimant in the case, had been subjecting me to racial discrimination for over two years. Additionally, Ad Hoc continued said racism by instigating this court action to evict me as race based retaliation because I complained about said over two years long racism. The summary from the judge as final judgement was passed included the judge seemingly adjudging that evidence I had submitted to court did prove Ad Hoc is subjecting me to racial discrimination. The judge then stated that whatever evidence of the claimant’s aforementioned racism that is available is to be completely ignored by the court. The judge ruled I had the option of employing said evidence as a separate court action that I could launch against Ad Hoc. And with that the judge granted Ad Hoc’s application to evict me and the judge ruled that I must pay £12855 of Ad Hoc’s court costs.  

To recap a salient aspect of this imbroglio. Judge Gareth Webb more or less acknowledged Ad Hoc’s racism towards me but went ahead to pass judgement that I not only am to be evicted but I must pay racist Ad Hoc’s £12,855 court costs. Did Judge Webb not have the discretion to, at least, refuse Ad Hoc’s demand that I pay its court costs?  

By what stretch of the imagination is that justice? How can that possibly be interpreted as justice?  Does that seem like justice that reflects the nation of the UK that claims it really legally stands against race based discrimination?

Should the court not consider that I might not have or be able to muster the resources and funds needed to separately bring court action against the claimant? I came so close to instigating court action against Ad Hoc with the aim of receiving compensation from it for the racism it is still subjecting me to. The adverse effects of Ad Hoc’s over two years long racism includes having had to take time off work on at least three occasions – I believe I deserve compensation in the region of over £100,000. However, to instigate such court action I have to pay a non refundable 5% of that as a court fee – £5000! I wholeheartedly view the aforementioned judgement of Judge Gareth

Webb as a perversion of justice. The fact that the only possible legal remedy to that judgement was to enrich the court by paying court fee does credibly suggest that said perversion of justice is meant to serve as a possibly means to transfer wealth from citizens  to the court system.  

Why would a court cleave apart two closely related significant aspects of the same matter as if they are separate matters? On the one hand you have the first aspect which is the application for a possession order which is actually the crime of race based retaliation because I complained about my landlord’s over two years long racism towards me. The other aspect centres around whether the court believes it ought to put a stop to me, the defendant, being subjected to further racism at the hands of the claimant and the significant harm that stems from that additional racism – because granting the claimant’s wish to evict me and making me pay the claimant’s court costs is tantamount to perpetuating, aiding and abetting the aforementioned first aspect. In this case the court opted to grant the claimant’s application for a possession order and thereby the court has aided, abetted and perpetuated the race based discrimination that the claimant has been subjecting me to for over two years – and thereby the court is perpetuating the harm that the claimant is forcing me to endure. By granting the claimant’s application the court is the root cause of why I am still being subjected to the serious adverse effects of the claimant’s racism that commenced over two years ago.  

Post-Court Hearing Racism Is Worse Than Pre-Court Hearing Racism.

In fact the part of this over two years long racism that has come about as a result of the court granting said application, namely, being evicted and having to pay the claimant £12,855 in costs to the claimant, is much worse than the racism that came pre-court hearing.

This Court’s Criminal Judgement Centres Around Ad Hoc’s Race Based Discrimination. However, the Court’s Judgement Would Be Just As Criminal If a Different Type of Discrimination Like Disability or Gender or Age or Sexual Orientation Were Involved

A significant summary of this judgement centres around this court’s judgement including the notion that justice is served by ignoring criminal racist acts simply because the entity that committed the race based crime is a private entity and not a public entity. Put in other words, a court in the U.K. – the very same U.K. that forever proclaims that it is against all kinds of discrimination – rules that discriminating in favour of private landlord that are racist and being discriminatory towards minorities that are at the receiving end of the racism of such racist landlords is how to serve justice and not be racist.  Put in other words this court is based on the batshit crazy and totally unjust notion that,

‘Discrimination in favour of some entities will NOT result in discrimination against other entities’.

THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE – THE COURT IS GUILTY OF ACTING
LIKE A RACIST CRIMINAL

You do not have to be a genius to know that if the laws that are meant to stop discrimination are employed against public entities – but not private entities – that is 100% a case of actually promoting discrimination. District Judge Gareth Webb, by not employing the law to immediately put a stop to Ad Hoc’s racism towards me, is exactly the same as the court itself also being guilty of subjecting me racism.

The precise part of the transcript above that proves this point is this,

“The structure of the Act differentiates between public bodies and private bodies, companies and individuals. With public bodies there is no doubt that acts of discrimination can be dealt with by a judicial review, the powers for judicial review, include the quashing of those discriminatory acts. In relation to private bodies and individuals, the structure  of the legislation is set out that the remedy is in tort.”

That is absurd; this court’s ruling is as absurd as it is criminal.

As the judge was passing this judgement I actually asked if the court would refuse Ad Hoc’s racist application to evict me if it (Ad Hoc) were , say, Bristol City Council – as in a public entity landlord as opposed to a private entity landlord – and the judge said ‘Yes’.  

Put in other words, the court was completely ignoring Ad Hoc’s racism simply because Ad Hoc is a private entity.

That is why I asked the judge the question,  

“On the basis of the logic that forms the basis upon which you are passing judgement that completely ignores Ad Hoc’s racism towards me, does that not mean that a police officer might not really have the legal right to arrest a person in the street that repeatedly screams the N-word at me because just like Ad Hoc a person in the street is a private entity, just like Ad Hoc?”

After all, in the name of treating all people equally, what is good for the geese is good for the gander;  if Ad Hoc’s racism can be completely ignored then similarly the racism of someone screaming the N-word at me should also be ignored, should it not?  

I remember the judge being flummoxed and not having a response to my question.

The legal representative of Ad Hoc, responded by suggesting that my being called the N-word under such circumstances might not be a crime.

AN APT ANALOGY

The transcript showing immediately above is evidence that the following is an apt analogy to describe the discriminatory thinking behind how the court ruled in favour of racist Ad Hoc.

‘The evidence before the court does indeed prove that this application to evict me is part of a two year long ongoing campaign of racism against the defendant. But this court will not put a stop to this race based hate crime by not granting this race based retaliation that came about because the defendant complained about the claimant’s racism. Instead, this court believes that justice will be best served by first letting the claimant benefit from said race based retaliation, by granting the race based application for eviction, making the defendant pay the £12,855 court costs of his racist landlord and casting the defendant aside to – possibly – garner the not insignificant effort and exorbitant fees need to hire a barrister that will be needed to instigate a separate court action to possibly make the claimant pay for – both – the racism inflicted on the defendant before court action was instigated by the claimant and the racism that results from the court letting the claimant benefit from having the race based retaliation possession order application granted. This court believes it serves the interest of justice to subject the defendant to the fate of both having to garner the funds to pay his landlord’s £12,855 court costs while also having to garner funds to instigate court action against his racist landlord.

ANOTHER APT ANALOGY

Criminal Enough to Convict a Racist Landlord But Not Criminal Enough to Stop that Racist Landlord from Benefit From His/Her Racism

(CONTEXT: The evidence that I submitted to court includes an account of racism that I suffered in, I believe 2018,  at the hands of police officers. The evidence details how said racism suffered at the hands of the police is similar to the racism I am being subjected to by the claimant. That account of police racism includes an audio recording that I captured on my smart phone of a John Paul Clift (JPC) threatening to kill me and calling me a ‘Black c*nt!’. This audio recording resulted in JPC being found guilty of discrimination in court. I can provide more detail of this matter. The main point I am making here is that managing to capture verbally expressed racial discrimination by an audio recording device is plausible)   

If in the presence of a police officer the claimant, Ad Hoc, who is a private entity, states the following about me, a black man,

“I want to evict that ‘Ni**er Black C*nt because he claims I have been subjecting him to racism for over two years”

And I managed to record this with my smart phone that would be the equivalent of evidence of race based discrimination. race based discrimination – it would evidence that would get Ad Hoc found guilty of racial discrimination in a U.K. court.  Furthermore, while my landlord is being convicted it would be recognised that allowing my landlord to evict me under such circumstances would be equivalent to letting my landlord benefit from being racist towards me. But, despite that, according to Global 100 Ltd Vs Laleva, in an instance like this where – my landlord had been convicted based on  evidence that proves my landlord’s racism towards me is why my landlord has applied to court for permission to evict me –  justice will best be served if said evidence of racism is completely ignored and the application to evict me is granted AND justice will best be served if I pay my racist landlord’s £12855 court costs?

I contend that as opposed to justice being served that would be akin to the crime of perverting the course of justice by aiding, abetting and continuing an ongoing crime of racism. 

This Is Akin to the Following ‘Police Analogy’ Too

Imagine a police officer actually witnesses Citizen A stealing Citizen B’s purse. Bystanders help detain Citizen A. Citizen B knows the police officer witnessed the theft and asks the police officer to arrest Citizen A and return her purse to her. The police officer turns around and tells Citizen B I will not do that. What I can do is arrange for you to attain Citizen A’s details so you can take court action against Citizen A – but in the meantime Citizen A can keep your purse.

Citizen B protests to the police officer by asserting that failure to return the purse will mean Citizen A will be free to benefit from the crime of stealing the purse by spending the money in the purse. But the police officer brushes that aside by insisting that putting a stop to the first crime of the purse having been stolen by returning the purse to its rightful owner AND also putting a stop to the likely furtherance of that first crime by returning the purse to its rightful owner Citizen  B before thieving Citizen A spends the money in the purse is NOT how justice will best be served.  The police officer insists that justice will best be served if thieving Citizen A is allowed to spend Citizen B’s stolen money that is in the purse while Citizen B is expected to so unnecessarily and unconscionably made to attempt to garner the

considerable resources, time and funds to launch court action so as to make

Citizen A repay the money in the purse.  That is not justice! That is  kafkaesque, deranged and criminal.  

The justification that the court employed to rule against me; and rule in favour of Ad Hoc is very much like this analogy.

The phrase ‘perverting the course of justice’ is probably quoted so often it might veritable qualify to be viewed as a cliche. In this case the judgement this court passed is a bonafide perversion of justice – it is a judgement that is tantamount to aiding, abetting and perpetuation Ad Hoc’s racism.  

THE COURT’S RACISM IS WORSE THAN AD HOC’S RACISM

By granting Ad Hoc’s application to evict me the court is the root cause of why I am being subjected to much worse racism than before the court became involved. The court giving Ad Hoc permission to evict me AND passing a judgement that I am legally liable to pay Ad Hoc’s court costs of £12855 is equivalent to giving Ad Hoc legal permission to subject me to racism that is worse that Ad Hoc’s racism before the court became involved.  

Judge Gareth Webb Acknowledged Ad Hoc’s Racism. With that Being the Case Why Did He Not Use His Discretion to – Not – Rule that I Am Also Liable to Pay Racist Ad Hoc’s £12,855 Court Costs? Please read that court transcript showing above. It is just a part of what was said in court that day. The evidence – including documents and photographs that I have provided here as part of a rough draft of the book I plan to have ghost written  – is the same evidence that I made available to District Judge Gareth Webb/the court. It is evidence that 100% proves that Ad Hoc had been and was still subjecting me to racism in court right in front of District Judge Webb. Furthermore, the transcript shows that Judge Webb , more or less, accepted my accusation to be true that Ad Hoc had been and, in effect,  was still subjecting me to racism in that court room by insisting that I should be evicted. Ad Hoc’s legal representative demanded that the judge should pass judgement that includes the order that I must pay over £20,000 of Ad Hoc’s court costs. The judge employed his discretion to knock that down to £12,855. Here is the question that I have for District Judge Gareth Webb.

“If you had evidence before you that proved that Ad Hoc, for over two years, had been and, was still subjecting me to racial discrimination in court that day, and you employed your discretion to rule that I should pay Ad Hoc £12,855 in court costs, and not the over £20,000 that Ad Hoc demanded, why did you not employ your discretion to rule that I should not pay a single penny to Ad Hoc’s court cost since the evidence before you proved that Ad Hoc’s racism towards me was the root cause of why Ad Hoc was applying to court to evict me?”

This Is Akin to the Following ‘Police Analogy’

Imagine a police officer actually witnesses Citizen A stealing Citizen B’s purse. Bystanders help detain Citizen A. Citizen B knows the police officer witnessed the theft and asks the police officer to arrest Citizen A and return her purse to her. The police officer turns around and tells Citizen B I will not do that. What I can do is arrange for you to attain Citizen A’s details so you can take court action against Citizen A – but in the meantime Citizen A can keep your purse.

Citizen B protests to the police officer by asserting that failure to return the purse will mean Citizen A will be free to benefit from the crime of stealing the purse by spending the money in the purse. But the police officer brushes that aside by insisting that putting a stop to the first crime of the purse having been stolen by returning the purse to its rightful owner AND also putting a stop to the likely furtherance of that first crime by returning the purse to its rightful owner Citizen  B before thieving Citizen A spends the money in the purse is NOT how justice will best be served.  The police officer insists that justice will best be served if thieving Citizen A is allowed to spend Citizen B’s stolen money that is in the purse while Citizen B is expected to so unnecessarily and unconscionably made to attempt to garner the

considerable resources, time and funds to launch court action so as to make

Citizen A repay the money in the purse.  That is not justice! That is  kafkaesque, deranged and criminal.  

The justification that the court employed to rule against me; and rule in favour of Ad Hoc is very much like this analogy.

The phrase ‘perverting the course of justice’ is probably quoted so often it might veritable qualify to be viewed as a cliche. In this case the judgement this court passed is a bonafide perversion of justice – it is a judgement that is

tantamount to aiding, abetting and perpetuation Ad Hoc’s racism.  

A JUSTICE SYSTEM SHOULD NOT BE SO SIMILAR TO A CRIMINAL GANG THAT IS EXTORTING MONEY FROM INNOCENT CITIZENS

How Might One Fashion a Justice System that Aims to Traumatize and Extort Money From Citizens?

As a result of the decision the court made in this case the options open to me to right the gross injustice of this decision is to appeal. For the past few days I have been preparing such an appeal. This involves paying an appeal fee to court, possibly having to pay a separate fee to attain a transcript of the court hearing and that is a cost that is known for being exorbitant , wrestling with a number of forms that have to be filled in, making several copies of the filled in forms etc. I am not being hyperbolic at all when I assert that if one wanted to devise a justice system that aims to deliberately traumatise and exhort money from a citizenry one would have achieved the desired result if one ends up with a justice system that delivers the kind of judgement that has resulted in a court saying I must be evicted AND I must pay racist Ad Hoc £12855 in court costs . If what I am enduring as a result of what has happened so far with regards to this case is anything to go by this by a wide margin is much more like a traumatizing governmental money grab than justice. It seems to be a justice system that is partially based on the notion that if a court decision has not been in a person’s favour then that person must be in the wrong and therefore that person deserves to be made to jump through hops and  made to pay the justice system all sorts of punitive amounts of money. That is more like extrajudicial justice than justice.  

The transcripts are held within the justice system. Why are tax paying citizens made to pay so much for transcripts?

Dastardly Elitist Judges That Cannot Intellectually Justify Their Rulings

In order to appeal this appallingly unjust decision I applied for permission to appeal and that meant I had to pay a fee of £151 to the court. I know the arguments that my appeal is based on are extremely sound and intelligent. I was refused permission to appeal. A Judge Berkley that refused me permission to appeal gave no explanation whatsoever to justify/explain why I was refused permission. To a significant extent the U.K. justice is very elitist and classist. As in it is biased in favour of certain people that are viewed as being of a higher class AND those that it deems to be of a lower class. People like myself, in situations like this are expected to unquestionable acquiesce to this court decision because I am expected to accept that I could not possibly know better than the judge that has refused me permission to appeal. I have intellectually gone up against MPs and judges in the past and so far no MP or judge has bested me. I think judges expect people like me to automatically respect and be in awe of them. That is not me, wrong guy! Respect is something you must earn. If you are a judge that passes decisions in court that are obviously unjust and inequitable then you are akin to a criminal that is perverting the course of justice. I am going to demand answers from this Judge Berkley that denied me this permission without explaining why she/he reached that decision. If she/he refuses to give me a logic explanation that is steeped in justice this judge is not going to like what I will write about her/him.

The court judgement is a travesty of justice - it is a court judgement that is tantamount to aiding and abetting racism. As soon as I am evicted &/or have to start paying Ad Hoc any of this £12,855, the contents of this book draft/ blog will be employed as a basis to create a Go Fund Me campaign to solicit funds from the public to pay Ad Hoc the £12,855.

Furthermore A Section of this Blog Will Contain a Tally of How Much of the £12,855 I Pay Ad Hoc Each Time I Make a Payment

Simon Wright - Ad Hoc’s U.K. Director of Operations - Is As Stupid and Incompetent As He is A Racist

Simon Wright ought to be an asset to Ad Hoc. He is paid a salary to employ his intelligence and competence to nationally protect the Ad Hoc brand.

I made Simon Wright aware of all the evidence , as summarised below, that proves that his subordinates , Trina Lewis & Paul Thomson, were subjecting me to racism. Simon Wright should have simply acknowledged the racism and put a stop to it. However, racist Simon Wright, in his fervour to do harm to me, an innocent black person, did not ask himself if his racism towards might also cause harm to him himself &/or his employer Ad Hoc. Simon Wright is so racist and so stupid he thinks the person/entity that will pay the biggest price for what is going on here is me possibly paying Ad Hoc £12,885. In the long term let us see if that is the case. Simon Wright and Ad Hoc will feature prominently in the aforementioned book about racists that I plan to have ghost written.

Could it be that in the UK Calling Me, a Black Person, a ‘Ni**er’ is Not a Crime?

Is Solicitor/Barrister James Castle of Tanfield Chambers a Closet Racist?

A pimply faced lardarse solicitor or barrister, I do not know which he is, called James Castle, who was representing Ad Hoc responded to my question by voicing his opinion that calling me a ‘N****r’ is not a crime. James Castle’s response is what one would expect of a closet racist.

Furthermore, James Castle was in court to defend and hide the racist conduct of Ad Hoc. So James Castle’s response aligns with what one would expect of a racist that is in court defending other racists. These are merely my opinions. Maybe exercise averse gluttonous James Castle is not a racist but just someone that thinks others should have the freedom to call black people like myself a ‘Ni**er’.

Overly Excitable Gaslighting

James ‘Calling a Black Person a ‘Ni**er!’ is Not a Crime’ Castle

The evidence that I had submitted to court included information about the fact that, under significant adverse circumstances, I was in the middle of employing my meagre funds to pay to bring to market a simple consumer product that I have invented and internationally patented in several countries. Seemingly, exercise averse James ‘Calling a black person a Ni**er!’ is not a crime’ Castle was in court to defend racist Ad Hoc. James Castle was privy to the mountain of evidence that I had submitted to court that incontrovertibly proves that Ad Hoc is subjecting me to prolonged racism - in effect he knew Ad Hoc is subjecting me to racism. In effect, the seemingly exercise averse James Castle was in court to cause me harm by doing whatever he could to make sure that Ad Hoc’s racism towards me is swept under the carpet. He knows that and so do I. Despite that he decided to engage me in conversation as if the reason why how are paths have crossed is convivial. So he asked me to tell him what my invention is all about. I responded by telling him, not in these exact words, to ‘Fuck off’. I believe his thinking was that gaslighting me by engaging me in such friendly banter would mentally destabilise me and thereby adversely affect how I defend myself in court. In my opinion James Castle is a racist fat twat. But of course I could be wrong - maybe he is merely a fat twat that thinks it should not be a crime for anyone to call me, a black person, a ‘Nig*er!’. If I ever meet him again I expect him to have lost weight as a result of the free health advice I have given him here.

In My Opinion A Lawyer Defending a Racist is Akin to a Lawyer That is a Racist

I do not know exactly whether James Castle is a barrister or solicitor so I will refer to him as a ‘lawyer’. James Castle is grossly mistaken if he thinks that him merely being a lawyer defending the conduct of a racist makes him immune from being seen as a racist. I do not need anyone to tell me how to decide who is or is not a racist. James Castle was privy to all the evidence that I had submitted that proves his client, Ad Hoc, was subjecting me to race based discrimination. Despite that he freely chose to defend Ad Hoc in court. As far as I am concerned if you expend effort with the conscious aim of wanting to sweep a racist’s racism under the carpet, so to speak, you yourself are little better than a racist. Solicitors and barristers defend the worst types of accused criminals - even when incontrovertible evidence conclusively proves that such accused criminals are definitely guilty of what they are accused of. The solicitors/barristers that defend such obviously guilty abhorrent criminals sometimes assuage the guilt they might harbour about defending such scum of the earth despicable criminals like racist Ad Hoc by stating that even accused persons that are obviously guilty of the most reprehensible crimes deserve to have support from a solicitor/barrister when defending themselves in court. That every accused person deserves the right to employ the expertise of a solicitor/barrister in court to defend themselves is absolutely true. That does not remove the fact that there is a gulf of a difference with regards to personal morality when one compares a solicitor/barrister that chooses a profession that involves defending the likes of obviously racist Ad Hoc to a person that simply would never ever defend the likes of an obviously guilty racist. That difference in personal morality, might be because the solicitor/barrister in question defending such abhorrent and obviously guilty accused person is as immoral and abhorrent as the accused person. Put in other words, maybe the reason why James Castle thinks calling me a ‘Ni**er!’ should not be a crime is because he too, just like Ad Hoc, is a racist. This is merely my opinion and my opinion could be wrong. A lawyer defending the actions of a racist is akin to someone that is a member of the racist National Front organisation that is aiding and abetting racism. I do view James Castle as a racist, that is my opinion that I am entitled. There are people that know it is totally abhorrent to defend the actions of racists and such people do not become lawyers that defend racists, because they know that aiding and abetting racism in any way whatsoever is reprehensible. And there is the likes of James Castle that both choose to become lawyers that defend racists and assert that calling a black person a ‘N****r’ is not a crime. The likes of James Castle behave in a manner that one would expect of a closet racist. But I could be wrong; maybe James Castle is not a racist - maybe James Castle is merely a fat twat that thinks it should not be a crime for anyone to call me, a black person, a ‘Nig*er!’.

Despite Presenting the Court with Incontrovertible Evidence of Ad Hoc’s Over 2 Years Long Campaign of Racism Towards Me I Lost in Court The court granted Ad Hoc’s application to evict me. The court also ruled that I should pay £12,855 of Ad Hoc’s court costs. Imagine that, here in the UK; a country that so strenuously claims it is against racism, a UK court not only rules that a landlord that has subjected a black tenant/guardian to prolonged racism can evict that black tenant/guardian - simple because that black tenant/guardian complained to the racist landlord about said campaign of racism. But also rules that the black person must pay almost £13,000 to the racist landlord. Below I detail the overwhelming body of evidence, including photographic evidence, that incontrovertibly proves Ad Hoc’s campaign of racism towards me. Despite all this evidence I believe the reason why Ad Hoc won in court is based on what in legal parlance is characterised as a ‘legal technicality’. Ad Hoc won because due to a legal technicality the court completely and totally refused to even look at my carefully collated body of evidence that proves Ad Hoc’s prolonged racism. I am still reeling from the shock of losing as a result of said legal technicality. Before I reveal this legal technicality I want to touch on main aspects of this over three years long period of being subjected to Ad Hoc’s racism.

A TEST OF MINE TO IDENTIFY A RACIST

I do not take accusing someone of being a racist lightly. I recently vociferously accused a sitting judge of being a dumb as a rock racist and dared her to give me the opportunity to repeat the accusation in court. That judge has never responded to deny my accusation. I think that judge has not denied my accusation because she knows it is accurate and, more importantly, she knows that the evidence I presented to her proves she is a moronic racist.

I am quite aware of the tendency for many to think a minority like myself too often, in a manner of speaking, plays the race card. Accusing anyone of being a racist is not something I do without prior careful thought. Decades of several painful experiences that can best be characterised as being caused by racism have compelled me to become something of an expert on the subject of racism. This, amongst other related things, has caused me to come up with notions that relate to racism that might be original. I do not need a legal expert like a solicitor/barrister or a judge to tell whether what I am experiencing is racism or not - I know when it makes absolute sense for me to accuse someone of being a racist. With particular regard to what I am experiencing at the hands of Ad Hoc, I have devised a, so to speak, test that I employed to decide if a person’s incontrovertible malicious conduct towards me rises to the level of what can credibly be characterised as racism. I suspect that a court would adjudge my test to be a legally credible one. I could be wrong.

My test could be said to be based on testing for the presence of three aspects that must appear in a particular chronological order. Those aspects could be described as follows.

(1) There has to be unassailable concrete evidence that proves that Person X has definitely subjected me to incontrovertible discrimination. But at this stage there is not enough evidence to call said discrimination racism.

(2) There is unassailable evidence that indicates the incontrovertible discrimination can credibly be interpreted as being race based. And I let Person X know that I believe she/he has subjected me to what I believe is incontrovertible race based discrimination. And I ask Person X to not subject me to additional discrimination, this is akin to giving Person X a warning. At this stage even if the original incontrovertible discrimination of (1) is not actually race based Person X ought to simply stop subjecting me to any kind of discrimination, irrespective of whether said discrimination is race based or not. After all if Person X has no intention to subject me to harm that comes from being subjected to discrimination AND if Person X has no intention to subject me to harm that comes from being subjected to race based discrimination Person X would be loath to commit either the crime of discrimination or the crime of race based discrimination. Conversely, Person X going ahead to subject me to additional discrimination - after - I have ‘warned’ him/her that I believe the initial incontrovertible discrimination is race based is akin to Person X self-certify him-/herself as a criminal that is guilty of discrimination or a criminal that is guilty of race based discrimination. And in almost all instances when Person X continues the discrimination after receiving such a warning, I believe the discrimination continues because Person X has consciously rolled the dice and placed the racist bet , so to speak, with the regards to believing that she/he will never have to pay a legal price for the incontrovertible discrimination that she/he is causing - irrespective of whether the incontrovertible discrimination is race based or not. In such an instance it makes perfect sense to view the intentional additional discrimination as being race based discrimination - the onus should be on the person that is deliberately inflicting the incontrovertible discrimination to prove that is not race based discrimination.

(3) Despite the warning cited under (2) Person X continues to subject me to discrimination. This matter centres around five people; three Ad Hoc employees and two guardians of Ad Hoc.

These Five People - Harriet Grove, Trina Lewis, Nick Martin, Paul Thomson & Simon Wright - Each Passed this Test. These are Five Racists

Every single one of these five Caucasians involved in this matter passed this test. When this matter ‘broke’ in 2021 I immediately made it clear to each of these people, except SW who I believe became involved much later, that I believe racism is the root cause of why they were harassing me. Despite that warning each one of them continued to, directly &/or indirectly harass me, with the intensity of the harassment being significantly worse compared to before I complained of racism. That is partially why, eventually, this matter was akin to the concerted effort of five racists that have been racially abusing me for over two years. My submitted evidence includes particular evidence that more succinctly evidences the concerted nature of said discrimination.

Personally, the way a person would have to treat me that would result in my accusing that person of being a racist will always be quite diametrically different from the conduct of a person with no malicious intention towards me.

How Easy Is It To - NOT - Face Being Credibly Accused Of Being A Racist? One way to answer this question is for a person to not have had a plurality of occasions during which each time that person has treated a minority in a manner that is distinctly malicious. And do not treat a minority in a manner that is much more akin to what might be characterised as discrimination than anything else.

After I let each of these people know that they were subjecting me to what I believe is racism they maliciously and intentionally kept on subjecting me to discrimination. That makes the discrimination race based discrimination. That means each of these five people is not just a racist but a self-certify racist.

The concrete evidence provided below incontrovertibly proves that Trina Lewis must have very intentional placed a racist bet that my fear of being evicted would make it possible for her to get away with causing me harm by issuing me with a formal warning, in the form of what Ad Hoc calls a Letter of Concern. I most definitely did not deserve that formal warning - more than anything else I believe Documents B1, B2 & B3 , that are shown and analysed below, prove that TL placed this racist bet.

For over two years, up until now, as a result of the direct and indirect effects of the very intentional and malicious racism of Ad Hoc’s Trina Lewis I have been turned into a pariah amongst the 95 odd Ad Hoc guardians that I live amongst. As a result of Trina Lewis’ racism I suspect that many of these guardians view me as a ‘typical aggressive black person’. There is one thing that makes TL’s accusation totally false - how can I be aggressive if my interaction with each guardian is almost 100% ZERO! Like a typical rabid racist at one stage TL desperately stated that my size is justification for other guardians to view me as aggressive - TL came out with this discriminatory comment because I pushed back against her falsely accusing me of being aggressive. I am not sure size discrimination is not as abhorrent and criminal as race discrimination. In the almost three years of living at Kenwith Lodge a great way to decide if I am aggressive is to find out how aggressive I have been towards the guy that lives in the room closest to mine - in that time him and I have never had a face to face altercation and we have barely ever said anything other than ‘Hi’ to each other. In the almost three years that I have lived as an Ad Hoc guardian I have only ever had aggressive interactions with only two guardians - Harriet Grove & Nick Martin. And without fail every such interaction has commenced as a result of the aggression of either of these two guardians,mall I have ever done is react to their aggression. To the best of my knowledge these two guardians are the only people in this complex of 95 odd guardians that act aggressively towards others. Trina Lewis’ racism significantly centres around her dehumanising me by falsely accusing me of being generally aggressive. This is a well known pattern of racism; falsely accusing innocent black people of being aggressive. It is why innocent unarmed black people often get shot by racist police officers. Eventually, Ad Hoc’s Paul Thomson, Trina, Lewis’ racist boss, also repeatedly falsely accused me of being aggressive. This is all detailed below - including my analysis that conclusively proves that the racists Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson have falsely accused me of being aggressive. I am not aggressive and there is no evidence that shows I am aggressive.

Race Seems to Be the Most Derided of All Protected Classes A country is either against racism or it is not. Evidence clearly shows the U.K. is not really against racism. I have been dealing with the painful effects of racism for decades and that has turned me into an expert of some sort on the subject of racism. UK Law includes The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Equality Act 2010. Each of these acts relates to some or all of the following protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. The aim of the acts is to ensure that a person does not suffer discrimination as a result of that person’s persona including one or more of these characteristics.

For decades I have been of the opinion that of all these protected characteristics, the rights of minorities of a particular race is the characteristic of all these protected characteristics that a significant percentage of people in the UK view as being of the least importance. I believe this helps to explain why after I had complained to each and every one of these five racists their racism towards never stopped. In fact, as detailed below, their racism towards me intensified significantly. I believe that if I had stated that I believe their discrimination towards me was because of , say, my religion &/or my disability &/or my sexual orientation the discrimination would have stopped. But in a manner similar to how black people are viewed as being the lowest hierarchy of human beings, the view that black people should be afforded legal protection from race based discrimination is viewed as the least important of all protected characteristics of the aforementioned two acts.

Let me back up this opinion of mine with real life examples.

The distressing experience that I had with racist police officers in Cardiff, that I described above, is an example that backs up what I mean. It is an example that details an out of The Racists’ Playbook known pattern of racist behaviour that centres around how a minority complaining about racism is viewed as a reason why the minority should be punished as retaliation for daring to accuse anyone of racism.

With regards to that experience with Cardiff police officers that I detailed above, I believe that if I were, say, white and disabled, and JPC had called me a ,say, a ‘Disabled C*nt!’ , those Cardiff police officers would have arrested him immediately and I would not have been issued with a warning.

As summarised below, the racism that I was subjected to by these racist Cardiff police officers is similar what I am still experiencing with the racists Harriet Grove, Nick Martin, Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright here in Bristol.

Chilling Effect of Racism

Please think about that for a moment. Not only were these four police officers willing to absolve JCP of an incontrovertible race based crime, they also criminalised, me, the minority that bore the brunt of said race based crime and also potentially exposed me to mortal danger at the hands of racist JCP. An innocent black person knowing that she/he might be criminalised in some way simply because she/he asked for help could have the chilling effect of a black person who has been subjected to crime not asking for police help out of fear of being criminalised. This is partially why if I am lost and a police officer is the only person that could give me directions I do not ask for a police officer’s help. What has been happening to me at the hands of Ad Hoc is so similar.

Ad Hoc Used Nick Martin As Bait In An Attempt to Prove I Am Aggressive. As summarised below, Ad Hoc has very deliberately been promoting a volatile atmosphere between Nick Martin and myself, this has caused him (NM) to continue to act aggressively towards me and the only reason why I have not knocked NM’s teeth down his throat is because that seemingly is what Ad Hoc wants - the evidence summarised below indicates that it might be the case that Ad Hoc wanted to provoke me into being physically aggressive towards NM so as to be able to say,

‘See, we were right Shina is aggressive’.

Why Are Fraud Victims So Much More Important Than Racism Victims? If you want to take someone that has defrauded you to court you have a deadline of six years after you were defrauded to launch the court action. Guess what deadline is set if you want to launch action against someone that has subjected you to racism? Six months less a day! Not even six months! If that audio recording of JCP calling me a ‘black c**t!’ had been presented to court over six months after I recorded it it would have been worthless. Does that suggest the UK cares much about minorities like myself that are subjected to racism? As you know, 6 years is 12 periods of 6 months. It seems like victims of fraud are viewed as being 12 times more worth helping than victims of racism. Does that suggest the U.K. is really against racism?

How Little the U.K. Cares About Racism is Much Worst Than I Thought Despite my belief that the U.K. does not particularly care about the crime of racism I thought a court would definitely have a great interest in viewing evidence that I submitted to court that very clearly proves Ad Hoc is subjecting me to discrimination. Especially, if said discrimination very much can credibly be characterised as being race based. Silly naive me! One of the highest courts in the U.K. passed judgement in a case called Global 100 Ltd Versus Laleva that, apparently, is very similar to the circumstances that caused Ad Hoc to take me to county court. Judges at county courts , I believe; I could be wrong, have to pass judgements that are identical to judgements passed in higher courts if the matter being judged is deemed similar enough to a case that has already been decided in a higher court. I am about to come to why in court I was compelled to ask that ‘N****r’ question. Apparently, in Global 100 Ltd Versus Laleva a Lord Justice Lewison ruled that discrimination/racism that a landlord, or entity like Ad Hoc, might have employed as an excuse to evict a tenant/guardian can simply be totally ignored if the landlord is a private entity.

Hearing this was like a shock to my system. All my life I had thought that all laws of the land apply to all persons equally. It turns out that is not the case; private entities are treated more favourably in court!

Behaviour of Two Ad Hoc Employees and Aggression of Two Guardians Was Like Aggression of Four Racist Guardians

Ad Hoc’s Clause 5.8 states the following,

“The licensee will use his or her best endeavours to use and occupy the premises in harmony with all other licensees/Occupiers and will not interfere with such shared occupation. The licensee will not cause any Nuisance or annoyance to any fellow guardian and will not engage in any Aggressive or passive aggressive, Threatening , Insulting , Violent, Anti-Social behaviour to any fellow licensee/Guardian and will not do anything which results or might result in Harm, injury, arm or distress.”

Trina Lewis & Paul Thomson Were As Bad As Harriet Grove & Nick Martin. I want to draw attention to how this Ad Hoc clause stipulates that even low level bad behaviour like passive aggression is not to be tolerated. This matter started with me complaining to Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis about the harassing behaviour of guardians, Harriet Grove and Nick Martin, that behaviour incontrovertibly proves that this duo violated this clause 5.8. However, pretty soon Trina Lewis’ response to my complaint made it clear that I was in a situation that was akin to Trina Lewis being a third badly behaving guardian whose violation of this clause was worst than that of guardians that the clause is supposed to relate to. And when Trina Lewis’ boss , Paul Thomson, became involved it soon became as if I was confronted by the racist behaviour of four guardians who were violating that clause.

Harriet Grove is a Trailer Trash Racist

In Order to Avoid Conflict I Left Ad Hoc Whatsapp Group

There had been two really minor events that involved other guardians and myself employing an Ad Hoc Whatsapp chat group to express verbal differing opinions. No face to face confrontations or anything as notable/serious as that; just really non-event online verbal argy bargy. There is not a single thing I would change about how I conducted myself during these online altercations - I am opinionated and if provoked I do not shy away from expressing my opinion, as is my right. My modus operandi, so to speak, has always been to do my best to avoid more serious conflict with others. These two minor events caused me to decide to leave that Whatsapp group. My thinking was that if I have less contact with fellow guardians there will be less scope for the possibility of serious conflict. So I left that Ad Hoc Whatsapp group.

Putting how Ad Hoc’s employees eventually became involved aside let me set out how this whole imbroglio was engendered by not one but two acts of narcissism of Harriet ‘The World Revolves Around Me’ Grove. Way back in 2021, I very quickly correctly recognised the fact that Harriet Grove is a textbook perfect example of a narcissist. Her narcissistic sh*t stirring is why Nick Martin sent me a really inappropriate message that is akin to harassment. And the complaint that I sent to Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis included that message that Nick Martin had sent to me, That message represented all the evidence that Ad Hoc needed to know that both Harriet Grove and Nick Martin were in violation of Ad Hoc’s aforementioned clause 5.8. But instead of Ad Hoc recognising that, it (Ad Hoc) reacted in a manner that mirrors what those racist Cardiff police officers did do. Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis completely ignored Harriet Grove’s bad behaviour towards me and, instead, issued me, the innocent black person, with a formal warning.

(X)

HARRIET GROVE’S FIRST ACT OF AGGRESSIVE NARCISSISM

Harriet Grove decided to instigate a face to face confrontation with me; the next thing I know she is shouting and snarling at me as she tells me all that she thinks is wrong with me. During the confrontation she angrily pointed out what she believes are flaws in my character - she accused me of being a bad communicator, she accused me of being in the wrong for having left the Ad Hoc WhatsApp group and she accused me of having left because, according to her, I believe I am superior to other guardians. Who is being superior? Harriet Grove who thinks it is her place to dictate to me, or any guardian, if I should or should not leave a Whatsapp group? Or me that simply exercised my right to leave the Whatsapp group because I wanted to minimise conflict and because I have the absolute right to live my life how I see fit? In actuality I had left so as to potentially decrease the chances of having conflicts with the likes of her and NM! Because I Am Not Aggressive - Despite Being Black - I Silently Walked Away: I have the broken bones to show that I used to be a nightclub bouncer - I can fully verbally &/or physically handle aggressive persons. But, as a matter of principle, I prefer to avoid conflict. That is why after HG stopped snarling at me I stoically walking away without uttering a single word of anger as a response.

AM I MISSING SOMETHING - ARE OTHE GUARDIANS AGGRESSIVE TRAILER TRASH LIKE HARRIET GROVE?
There is a huge difference between an Ad Hoc guardian that lives by “Live and Let Live’ and the likes of cancerous narcissistic guardians like Harriet Grove. There are said to be about 95 Ad Hoc guardians in the compound of buildings that include the building Kenwith Lodge where Harriet Grove and myself live. I believe that Harriet Grove’s alarming aggressive narcissistic behaviour towards me is a rare anomaly because most if not all other of the aforementioned 95 guardians live without ever thinking they ought to aggressively talk down to other guardians as if she is the boss of all guardians. HG’s aggressive conduct towards me was an incontrovertible breach of Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8

(Y)

HARRIET GROVE’S SECOND ACT OF NARCISSISM

I know how important it is to be civil and live in peace with others and that comes naturally to me. It is what I believe in - treat others the way you hope to be treated. I believe and actualise this belief. I was not friends with any of the guardians that I live with at Kenwith Lodge. But I was not averse to being cordial with fellow guardians. By this stage I had literally broken bread with Nick Martin (NM) - I thought he had an interest in bread that I bought so I offered him some of my bread. There had also been a time where I thought NM was interested in the green tea that my girlfriend sends me from Japan. So I gave him some of my green tea bags. I look back at this and realised it was a mistake to assume being that cordial was a risk free approach - after all proximity can breed over familiarity. None of this was reason or justification for NM to assume that the civil and sociable manner with which I related to him is justification for him to cross that boundary of the two of us merely being two guardians that ended up living together, as result of Ad Hoc’s random recruitment of guardians, to him thinking we are friends. NM is not a child, he might be in his late 20s or over 30, and he needs to be held responsible for his actions. NM crossed that significant boundary of him and I are merely being guardians, as opposed to being friends, by inappropriately sourcing my personal telephone through my membership of an Ad Hoc Whatsapp group and then employing that telephone number to send me a wholly inappropriate personal message that incontrovertibly violates Ad Hoc’s aforementioned clause 5.8. Only one or two days after HG’s first act of narcissistic aggression this is the personal message I received from NM.

(Z)

HERE IS A COPY OF THE FIRST MESSAGE THAT NICK MARTIN SENT TO ME

Nick’s First Message
Hi shina, it's Nick.

I was going to keep quiet on a couple of things, but left unsaid they are making for an uncomfortable and tense environment.

I put the question marks under your name. I don't know why you need to ask the meaning behind it when it seems obvious to me that its because you hadn't signed your name, which you need to do once youve done your cleaning duties. It was my turn after you and I was getting frustrated because I had no idea if you had done it yet, so it looked bad on me going over a couple of days from when I should have done mine, because I was waiting for you. And it could mean if you hadn't done it then I'm doing the extra build up of what you missed. This is easily solvable by singing the sheet, it shouldn't really be much to ask of housemates.

A few people have told me seperatly that you don't like cleaning, you yourself also gave me that impression when you saw me cleaning. It's not a far stretch to then assume you skipped the cleaning because you didn't want to do it, which would also explain why you hadn't signed off your cleaning. Can you see how not signing would cause this confusion??

Harri told me the question marks passive aggressive and I admit they were. I apologise for adding to any bad feelings. It was just about fairness and nothing else.

The second thing I'm in trouble with you for is your plate. I very much apologise because I simply thought the plate was mine. I have a plate identical to it in my cupboard, easy mistake.

The second thing I'm in trouble with you for is your plate. I very much apologise because I simply thought the plate was mine. I have a plate identical to it in my cupboard, easy mistake.

Harri was annoyed at me for not admitting about the question marks because it's gotten back to her and this is her first day back in 5 days. The last thing she wants is drama over small things. This is why I'm messaging you now having initially decided to keep quiet about it, which I thought was for the best. I'm not going to respond to you on the cleaning rota as it's a sheet for singing off your cleaning, not a discussion about it.

I don't think it's appropriate to suggest taking yourself off the cleaning rota entirely because of something this small. It doesn't excuse you not to do it in the slightest. It just means everyone else has to pick up your part which to me doesn't seem fair. It also hadn't helped that you left the WhatsApp group, which means you don't hear any of the important parts of the discussions.

One last thing, it's quite a big thing and important request which I hope you will respect.

Im asking everyone In the house that uses the upstairs kitchen to now close the kitchen door when you're in there.
I am requesting this because I hear every single noise that is made in there. I can hear every bump, plate, cupboard door and I can even hear you breathing. The problem is my door is basically touching the kitchen door so all the sound comes through it into mine.. It would be a massive help if you closed it everytime. If you just go into the to pick something up then there is no need but if you're in there for anything else Im requesting the door to be shut. I really appreciated you doing your ice in your room.

This message from Nick Martin conclusively proves that if not for what Harriet Grove had said to him about me there would have been absolutely no basis for me to file the complaint that I filed with Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc.

This is such an important aspect of Ad Hoc’s racism - without HG’s narcissistic sh*t stirring I would not have had cause to file the complaint that I did file with Ad Hoc; my complaint would have been impossible.

Please read that transcript again. Way back in 2021 this sh*t bag Harriet Grove's narcissistic aggression towards me included her telling me about her truck driver job. Fast forward about two years and here is this narcissistic racist scumbag ordering me to empty the bins while ..... AGAIN ..... fucking talking about her fucking truck driver job. Because that is what lardarse Harriet Grove does talk about herself and expect other guardians' lives to centre around her sad truck driver life. This is just truly pathetic!

Furthermore, in this message NM mentions Harriet Grove by name at least twice. Let me state that in other words. If not for the malicious narcissistic sh*t stirring Machiavellian behaviour of Harriet Grove I would have had nothing to complain to Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc about. Because I am not aggressive - I stoically and silently walked away from HG aggressively criticising me because I left that Ad Hoc Whatsapp group chat. If at this stage she had taken control of her narcissism by not sh*t stirring to make NM send me that message I would have no cause to file a complaint with Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc. But HG’s train wreck narcissistic is in control of her and that is why she caused NM to send me that message and that caused me to complain to TL/Ad Hoc.

Nick Martin Might Already Be in His 30s But The Message That He Sent Me Proves He is Like a Retarded Manchild that Can So Easily Be Used Like a Tool By a Narcissist Like Harriet Grove.

In this message NM comes across as if he is really sorry for some of the things that he did. Very early on I recognised that his ‘apologies’ are a smokescreen; a dishonest attempt to hide the fact that he is an invertebrate aggressive provocateur. For over two years after his apology he has repeatedly launched aggressive attacks at me. I could fully analyse all of this message to truly show how much of a moron Nick Martin is but instead I will summarise a few key parts.

Nick Martin’s Deliberate Provocation
The imbecilic logic he is spewing in the second paragraph is fully revealed when you ask NM,

‘If anonymously putting those three questions marks against Shina’s name was not a very deliberate attempt to cause a provocation AND if not knowing if Shina had fulfilled his turn to clean was causing you that much frustration then why did you not simply ask Shina if he had cleaned or not?’

I had fulfilled my turn to clean but had simply forgotten to put a tick next to my name to confirm that fact - it simply did not cross my mind to add a tick. Several people before me had also often forgotten to place a tick after cleaning. This whole matter that, over two years later, has ended up in court action is rooted in how NM very deliberately started a shitstorm of provocation by anonymously putting those three question marks against my name. Since his three anonymous question marks provocation over the last two years NM has repeatedly made me the subject of his aggression.

NM so extensively explains why I am in the wrong for not putting a tick against my name but absolutely everything he is spewing is proved to be imbecilic when you ask why did you not simply ask Shina if he had cleaned!

He did not ask me this simple question because the whole point of the three anonymous question marks was to be provocative - that is why the length explanations he has given to supposedly logically justify why he did not ask me are truly completely imbecilic. If one reads NM’s message from a critical and logical perspective the fact that Nick Martin is a bonafide imbecile shines through.

“Harri told me the question marks passive aggressive and I admit they”
A grown adult has to be especially spineless to let anyone cause him to write something like this. This would be appropriate if NM were a ,say, ten year old child and Harriet Grove were his mother. NM should ask HG to give him his balls back. For about three weeks he knew I wanted to know why someone put three big question marks against my name. He deliberately refused to reveal himself to me. Here he is nonsensically claiming that he did not see this as being passive aggressive/deliberate provocation - it took HG to tell him that his conduct is passive aggressive for him to become aware of this fact.

“Harri was annoyed at me for not admitting about the question marks because it’s gotten back to her and this is her first day back in 5 days”
Read this and it proves at least two things. One, NM is a complete imbecilic tool - Harriet Grove’s imbecilic tool. Two, because Harriet Grove is a narcissistic cancerous thing she thinks it is perfectly appropriate to be telling other guardians that they need to behave in a way that makes her crummy life more comfortable. Only a narcissistic guardian would think it is remotely acceptable to be telling other guardians how they ought to behave because she has been away for the past five days working. This is vintage narcissistic Harriet Grove - she effing thinks the world revolves around her existence!

The only person that is interested in any day being Harriet Grove’s first day back in 5 days is the imbecilic village idiot NIck Martin who should ask Harriet Grove to give him his balls back!

As a result of all this that HG did in late 2021 I quickly diagnosed her as a narcissist, I fail to see how any unbiased and reasonably person would have not reached the same conclusion based on the evidence - except that, as detailed below, Ad Hoc ignored this red flag. Ad Hoc must have recognised her disruptive narcissism but decided to ignore it.

Watch out for an absolutely disgusting aggressive confrontation that she launched at me about two years later, in 2023. That confrontation,

‘The Empty the Bins Or I Will Tell Trina’

confrontation provided much stronger proof of two particular things. It provided stronger proof of the fact that HG is an aggressive narcissistic. It also provided much stronger proof of the fact that the racism I am being subjected to is as a result of Ad Hoc employees and the guardian, Harriet Grove, working hand in hand with each other.

Harriet Grove Used Nick Martin Like A Brainless Tool!
In NM’s message he makes it clear that he is sending me the message because the racist Harriet The World Revolves Around Me Grove had complained to him about my behaviour towards her! Except that I had not behaved badly towards HG or anyone else - later HG actually admitted this fact! But because NM is a complete and utter brainless tool he decided it makes sense to blindly believe HG and send me this message. What part of that does not completely prove that Nick Martin is a brainless tool? As a result of this, in this message NM proceeded to admonish me for behaving badly towards HG!

I mean for crying out effing loud, I should not be getting such a message from a grown man!

NM also, just like HG, made it clear that his aggression towards me had a lot to do with the fact that he believed he had the right to dictate that I should not have left one of Ad Hoc’s WhatsApp groups. NEITHER OF THESE TWO EFFING BRAINLESS RACIST TWATS SEEMS TO UNDERSTAND THE - VERY VERY - SIMPLE CONCEPT THAT IT IS NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS WHATSOEVER WHETHER I STAY IN A WHATSAPP GROUP OR NOT.

Nick Martin Says My Breathing Disturbs Him!

Did I state that Nick Martin is a fucking imbecile - only an imbecile would complain about another person’s breathing!

Nick Martin Demonstrated to Another Guardian How My Breathing Disturbs Him!
In his message to me Nick Martin literarily complained that my breathing in the kitchen disturbs him! Despite how he has written this he never sent a message to anyone else to complain about their breathing - he only complained about my breathing. Eventually, during a face to face confrontation that he instigated NM literarily demonstrated to another guardian, JF, how my breathing in the kitchen disturbs him - he did this by , supposedly, mimicking how I breath in the kitchen. Witnessing this demonstration was the first time JF became aware that NM had ever complained about anyone’s breathing. That is mainly why I believe that NM had only ever complained about my breathing.

Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis should have viewed NM complaining about my breathing as a massive red flag that should have set him completely apart from me. Except that Ad Hoc hardly acknowledged this provocative behaviour.

I can understand the huge difference between caucasian Nick Martin needing to provoke me, a black person, because he is a racist. And complaining about my breathing as a means to provoke me because he is a racist. Complaining about my breathing is so moronic it proves that Nick Martin is not just a racist, he is both a racist and a bonafide imbecile. No normally intelligent person complains about another person’s breathing to do that is unbelievable discriminatory.

In the following two years NM kept putting forth different batshit crazy nonsensical excuses to explain why my being in the kitchen meant I was disturbing him. And each time he did this Trina Lewis encouraged how he was harassing me in this manner. NM is not the first or only person who has stayed in one of the two rooms that share a wall with the kitchen. However, in the over two years that I have lived in Kenwith Lodge NM is the only person that has repeatedly complained about the activity of anyone in the kitchen. And the only person that he has ever complained about with regards to being in the kitchen is myself. And every time NM newly complained about me being in the kitchen racist Trina Lewis supported his complaining nonsense.
NIck Martin is an imbecilic racist scum of the earth.

X, Y & Z IS WHY I DECIDED TO COMPLAIN TO AD HOC -
BECAUSE HARRIET GROVE’S SECOND ACT OF NARCISSISM
WAS A BRIDGE TOO FAR FOR ME.

I had already decided to simply forget and not react to HG’s first act of narcissism but HG had to go too far with her narcissism by causing NM to send me this wholly inappropriate message. This message that gullible NM sent to me as a result of him letting himself be used like a brainless tool by the racist narcissist Harriet Grove is what compelled me to send a complaint to Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis.
What HG and NM had done so far incontrovertibly proves that both of them had violated the aforementioned clause 5.8. I had done absolutely nothing wrong to anyone and there was no evidence of my wrong doing.

Please note that X, Y & Z include a single aggressive face to face confrontation - a confrontation instigated by Harriet Grove, not Nick Martin. With regards to the discriminatory way Ad Hoc eventually processed my complaint this aspect of this matter is quite relevant.

TRINA LEWIS IS A RACIST WHO NEEDS TO FEED HER RACISM. THAT IS WHY SHE EVENTUALLY ABSOLVED HER GUILTY FELLOW

CAUCASIAN HARRIET GROVE BUT GAVE ME, THE INNOCENT BLACK PERSON, A FORMAL WARNING.

HERE IS THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT I SENT TO TRINA LEWIS/AD HOC

Trina Lewis Herself Provides Evidence that Proves She is Racist Scum.

All TL had to do is look at the evidence that is the message that NM sent to me and let NM and HG know that they had violated clause 5.8 and let them know that they have no right to be harassing me. That is what I expected TL to do - and that is why I thought this matter would be over quickly. But the racist TL had other ideas because she has a malicious racist ego that needs to be satiated by causing harm to innocent black persons.

TL has refused to explain this injustice. My complaint included a copy of that message from NM - my complaint therefore represents rock solid proof that HG’s narcissistic sh*t stirring is the root cause of why I had filed the complaint. My complaint includes a second message sent to me by NM - in this message he continues to put forth the most idiotic explanations to justify why he did not simply ask if I had fulfilled my cleaning turn! My complaint mentions Harriet Grove by name eight times. Put in other words, if you consider that HG’s narcissism caused her to make NM send me the message shown above and that is primarily what caused me to complain about her & NM to Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc AND my complaint mentioning HG eight times then to assert that HG has nothing to do with this matter is bat shit crazy, right?

The document showing immediately above was supplied to court by Trina Lewis herself - it mentions her fellow caucasian racist , Harriet Grove by name eight times. Despite that Trina Lewis ended up giving me a Letter of Concern formal warning. But Trina Lewis completely and totally absolved Harriet Grove of all culpability! This means that Trina Lewis herself has provided the primary evidence that proves she is a racist.

Please consider these acts of aggression from HG and then answer this question

FACT:
 If you remove the overwhelming - two - narcissistic sh*t stirring roles that Harriet Grove played in this whole matter so far, there would be no basis for me to file the complaint that I did submit to Trina Lewis.

That means that as a result of my complaint if only one person was to receive any form of a warning from Ad Hoc it would have to be HG, or NM. If only two persons were to receive warnings that would have to be HG and NM. The complaint that I filed with Ad Hoc included a perfect copy of the message that NM sent to me - so Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis cannot possibly claim they do not know that HG’s sh*t stirring aggressive narcissism is the root cause of all this.

Please read Nick Martin’s message and my complaint again, this is unassailable evidence that proves that,……

HARRIET GROVE - NOT - RECEIVING A WARNING WHILE I RECEIVED A WARNING IS 100% PROVEN DISCRIMINATION. THE RACIST TRINA LEWIS IS THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF THIS AD HOC DISCRIMINATION AND FOR ALMOST THREE YEARS AD HOC HAS SIMPLY REFUSED TO ACCEPT THIS INDISPUTABLE DISCRIMINATORY FACT.

Harriet Grove is a sh*t stirring narcissistic who has a trailer trash cancerous personality. Initially, I did not consider her to be a racist too. I know racists absolutely love to trivialise the reality of racism by claiming a person like myself is ‘Playing the race card’ - TL eventually accused me of this. Personally, I think very carefully before accusing someone of being a racist. Later HG proved that she is also racist.

People like Harriet Grove are a like an infectious cancer - her cancer harms her and people around her. As a result of her narcissistic behaviour look how many people she is causing harm. I need to emphasis that I will only ever resort to legal means to right this injustice. If I have anything to do with it, in the long term, the harm that Trina Lewis will suffer as a result of Harriet Grove’s racist narcissism will far outweigh the £12855 that Ad Hoc sickly wants me to pay it because I simply asked for its racism to stop.

If I ever have to pay Ad Hoc a single penny this communication will become a ‘Help Me Pay Racist Ad Hoc £12,855’ Go Fund Me campaign. Such a campaign will accuse both Harriet Grove and Trina Lewis of being racists.

Right From the Beginning Trina Lewis Ignored Harriet Grove’s Culpability, Falsely Accused Me of Being Aggressive and Then Issued Me with a Formal Warning - That is Discrimination Eventually, as a result of the complaint that I filed TL asked Nick Martin and myself to attend two separate meetings in her office. Before the first of these meetings I was wondering why TL did not ask HG to also attend these meetings.

During Two Meetings Trina Lewis Subjects Me to Racial Abuse

Out of the Blue Trina Lewis Started Accusing Me of Being Generally Aggressive. TL was meant to adjudicate my complaint based on the evidence that is that message from NM - which is evidence that proved NM and HG were in the wrong. All TL had to do is tell both HG and NM that their behaviour was a violation of clause 5.8. TL should have told them they have no right to involve themselves in my life. She should have told them to leave me in peace. But when you are a one of the worse types of persons, namely a racist, you might not be able to resist an opportunity to cause harm to a person that is of a different race to your own. TL started accusing me of being aggressive towards other guardians. She steadfastly refused to give any examples of when I had been aggressive towards any guardian. Eventually, over two years later, she has stuck to accusing me of being aggressive - but she has forever completely failed to ever justify this accusation nor has she ever presented evidence to prove that I am aggressive. This is what caucasian racists do; they falsely accuse innocent black persons of aggression. On the contrary this communication proves that each and everyone of the five people I have accused of being racists have subjected me to racism.

Then by employing what I view as the most stupid and vile racism I have ever experienced TL ‘proved’ to herself that I am aggressive.

Black People Being Falsely Perceived As Aggressive By Significant Swath Of Society Is Established Racial Fact.

 I am reasonably knowledgeable of race based societal prejudices that significantly affect my interactions with caucasians in the U.K. society where I live. Put in other words, 10s of painful distressing personal experiences that I have had act as proof and reflections of what is espoused by articles like this Guardian article: It Is Like We Are Seen As Animals: Black Men On Their Vulnerability And Resilience https://tinyurl.com/4kz7w92b and Study: People See Black Men As Larger And More Threatening Than Similarly Sized White Men https://tinyurl.com/ mr2fa2pn. Trina Lewis is personification of the kind of racism that these articles are about – because Trina Lewis is a racist out of the blue she started falsely accusing me of being aggressive. This she did while completely ignoring that message that NM sent me that incontrovertibly proves that HG and NM are the aggressors, not me.

NICK MARTIN TELLS ME HE NEEDS TO PROTECT HARRIET GROVE FROM ME! Trina Lewis Can Read Nick Martin’s Mind! Imagine how dehumanising it is to me to have NM confront me to tell me that he needs to protect HG from me! I had done absolutely nothing to HG! HG had aggressively attacked me and I had simply walked away from her.

Ironically, a day or two after NM told me he needs to protect HG from me TL had informed me that with regards to my conduct HG had informed her (TL) that she (HG) had no cause to complain about my conduct (despite that HG’s narcissistic sh*t stirring caused her to make NM send me that message!).

At the meeting NM did not deny telling me he needs to protect HG from me. I pointed it out that saying he needs to protect HG from me, an innocent black man, seem very much like a historical pattern of viewing innocent black men as subhuman aggressive beings that are always going after white women. TL jumped to his defence by snarling that what NM did could not possibly be racism because she knows that NM would have said the same thing to me irrespective of his or HG’s skin colour. First of all, instead of simply playing a neutral unbiased role why was TL acting as NM’s lawyer? Furthermore, how could TL possibly know whether NM said what he said to me because he is an imbecile or an imbecilic racist? Up until this stage I had merely broached the possibility that the dehumanising thing he said to me - might - be racism. I had no way of knowing it was racism. However TL was snarling at me as she insisted that what he said could not possibly be rooted in racism. It did not take long at all for how TL was managing my complaint to start looking like racial discrimination. Here in the U.K., for a caucasian woman like Trina Lewis to think it is remotely acceptable and reasonable to start giving me, a black person, lessons about what is and is not racism seems very much like racism to me. I used to work as a nightclub doorman - but despite that what has transpired in over two years here at Kenwith Lodge proves that I am a non-aggressive person. If NM and I went head to head I am absolutely certain he will not last five seconds - this idiot cannot protect himself from me let alone protect anyone else from me. NM is a fucking cretin. I do not think I will ever come across a more perfect example of a agent provocateur cretin who is really begging for someone to knock his teeth down his throat. However, that person will not be me.

I actually think it might be the case that the likes of Nick Martin and Trina Lewis kept, directly and indirectly, subjecting me to aggressive provocations because they early on realised that I am - not - aggressive.

But, as explained below, it might also be the case that Trina Lewis was comfortable with seeing blood spilt.

The Deadly History of “They’re Raping Our Women” – https://tinyurl.com/kxpdypt8

‘Well, some people are disturbed by other people clearing their throats’.

This is how racist caucasian Trina Lewis kept defending her fellow caucasian Nick Martin throughout the two meetings, and throughout the following two years.

NM Complaining About My Breathing, Trina Lewis Ignored This Red Flag. I repeatedly asserted that complaining about my breathing was probably the best example of all of NM’s troubling behaviour towards me that shows he is simply employing any kind of excuse to harass me. TL shrugged this off as if it is inconsequential.

Trina Lewis Defended NM Provocatively Video Recording Me. Early on NM’s aggression was centred around him looking for excuses to claim that me being in the kitchen was causing him disturbance. One day at about 11.45pm I was in the kitchen making a cup of tea when NM stuck a smart phone in my face and started video recording me! I mentioned this at one of the two meetings with TL. Again TL defended NM’s provocation by saying something along the lines that him video recording me in the kitchen was somewhat justified because she had demanded proof that my conduct in the kitchen is disturbing NM. That is what this idiotic racist TL said to me. How on earth is a video recording of me making a cup of tea ever going to be proof that I am disturbing anyone!?! It will simply show me making a cup of tea!!!! The only likely effect that one guardian provocatively video recording another is going to have is possibly causing a physical altercation.

With how TL inexcusably excused this provocative video recording of my person it is less surprising that years later on two more occasions NM again video recorded me in the kitchen. This is one of several ways TL encouraged the aggression/ provocation that NM went on to subject me to over the following two years - Ad Hoc encouraged this aggression/provocation.

Trina Lewis First Most Explicit Act of Racism Towards Me Is As Brazen As It Is Imbecilic. Remember that message from NM incontrovertibly proves that HG is front and centre of why I had filed my complaint. When I asked why TL had not invited HG to the two meetings she (TL) angrily snarled at me as she asserted that this matter had nothing to do with HG! First it had been caucasian NM thinking he needs to protect caucasian HG from me. Now it was caucasian TL absolving HG of her (HG’s) culpability. I do not take accusing anyone of being a racist lightly. I will only level such an accusation if I believe I have unassailable and incontrovertible evidence that I can put forth in court to back up my accusation. Imagine this situation. Earlier in the meeting I had already repeatedly told TL that I believed the way she was managing my complaint seemed steeped in racial discrimination. TL had vociferously asserted that that was not the case. And yet here was caucasian Trina Lewis a few moments later preposterously claiming that her fellow caucasian woman, Harriet Grove, whose aggressive narcissism was the root cause of this imbroglio had nothing to do with this matter! In the face of the available evidence saying HG is innocent and not involved in this matter is absolutely imbecilic. Around this time all doubt was removed from my mind; I concluded that Trina Lewis is trailer trash racist scum. But TL’s worst form of racism during these two meetings was yet to come.

Trina Lewis’ Racist Freudian Slip. In the middle of managing my complaint Trina Lewis said something particularly strange to me. She became agitated as she snarled at me to tell me that HG had not complained about me!

Why on earth would TL need to say this to me while she is dealing with my complaint against HG?

Of course she has not complained about me because I had done absolutely nothing wrong to HG! For over two and a half years TL has refused to ever give any explanation to explain her discriminatory behaviour towards me - even though I lost count of how many times I politely asked. So I have had to repeatedly logically interpret her behaviour towards me and each time I have been compelled to conclude that

Racism best explains Trina Lewis’ discriminatory conduct towards me

I challenge anyone to come up with a more intelligent interpretation of TL suddenly ignoring the fact that HG was incontrovertible guilty of harassing me and instead angrily telling me that Harriet Grove had not complained about me. I think that was a racist’s Freudian slip - I think it is absolutely plausible that the following line of thinking is what caused TL to pass that strange comment:

‘The fact that a white woman has harassed you, a black person, is irrelevant. Instead, you should consider yourself lucky that Harriet Grove, a white woman, has not complained about you harassing her!’

If you think that is a too preposterous and hyperbolic a way to interpret how TL thinks you might not think so when you consider how she ‘resolved’ my complaint.

Desperately Trina Lewis Switched to Claiming My Size Was Justification for Other Guardians to View Me As Aggressive
During the meetings in response to TL not being able to justify why she was accusing me of being aggressive she asserted that my size was a good reason for other guardians to view me as aggressive. To be prejudiced against me because of my size is as reprehensible and unlawful as it is to be prejudiced against my skin colour.

Please consider these acts of aggression from HG and then answer this question

Study: people see black men as larger and more threatening than similarly sized white men
– Vox
https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/3/17/14945576/black-white-bodies-size-threat-study

TRINA LEWIS’ NEXT ACT OF RACISM IS WHY I HAVE DESCRIBED TRINA LEWIS’ TYPE OF RACISM AS BEING PARTICULARLY VILE AND REPREHENSIBLE , …………..

Trina Lewis Employs Her Own Racism to Justify Her Own Racism And Then Employs All That to Justify Accusing Me of Being Aggressive. Considering the fact that by now it was absolutely clear TL was being racially discriminatory towards me, I calmly pushed back against how TL kept snarling at me that HG had nothing to do with my complaint. TL then shouted at me as she informed me that the mere fact of me saying that HG was the main reason why I had the cause to complain in the first place was proof that I am aggressive! That is a type of racism that is truly vile and reprehensible. Imagine this sequence of three related aspects. (1) Caucasian TL falsely accuses me, a black person, of being aggressive because that is what racists do. TL could not justify why she accused me of aggression. Additionally, in desperation, she also snarls at me that my size is justification for others to view me as aggressive. (2) TL insists that her obviously culpable fellow caucasian, HG, is not guilty because doing whatever to discount the valid complaint of a black person is also what racists do. (3) I insist that HG is guilty. (4), TL then states that me doing (3) is proof that (1) is true. That is TL employing her own racism to justify her earlier racism!

The only person that acted aggressively at those meetings is Trina Lewis herself!

Trina Lewis Gave Me a Formal Warning But Completely Absolved Harriet Grove Trina Lewis will claim till she is blue in the face that she is not a racist. However, a main part of how she concluded processing the complaint that I submitted was to issue me with a formal warning and completely absolved HG of all her culpability.

Think about that. Despite my complaint that included that message that NM sent to me - a message that 100% proves that HG had violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8 and 100% proves that HG was being aggressive towards me and 100% proves I had done nothing wrong to anyone - TL completely absolved her fellow caucasian HG of all her culpability and instead issued me, the innocent black person, with a formal warning.

In the U.K., a licensor/landlord, for no justifiable reason, giving a black guardian/licensee a formal warning under these type of circumstances is a race based hate crime.

It is important to remember that she issued me with this formal warning AFTER I had repeatedly let her know that the way she was managing my complaint was racist. What I was telling TL during those two meetings was akin to me warning her that if she continues being racist towards me she might have to pay a price. TL knew HG was guilty and she knew I was innocent. Despite that she still went ahead to issue me the innocent black person with a warning while absolving her fellow caucasian HG of her incontrovertible guilt - that is 100% indisputable racism. TL knew that both issuing me with that formal warning and absolving HG of her culpability proves that she (TL) is guilty of racial discrimination because TL knew that the available concrete evidence proves that she is guilty of discrimination. Question: Despite that she went ahead and gave me that formal warning, why? Answer: Early on at the beginning of the first of those two meetings with TL it became clear to me that she (TL) had placed a racist bet. Namely, TL was betting on being able to - quietly - get away with her racism towards me because she believed I would be intimidated by the threat of eviction. Put in other words, TL thought I would be so afraid of complaining about her racism because she thought I would be afraid of being evicted. And here we are. Do I seem afraid of TL or anyone at Ad Hoc?

Eventually, in the following period of over two and half years two Ad Hoc employees that are senior to TL - a branch manager called Paul Thomson and Ad Hoc’s U.K. Director of Operations, a Simon Wright - have employed how TL falsely accused me of being aggressive during those two meetings as a foundation upon which they have so desperately attempted to build the false narrative that I am a typically aggressive black man. But as detailed below I easily employed logic and incontrovertible evidence - including tons of evidence that Ad Hoc itself submitted to court - to prove that the notion that I have been aggressive towards anyone is a figment of their collective rabid racist imaginations.

I CHALLENGE ANY GUARDIAN HERE TO GIVE A CREDIBLE ACCOUNT OF WHEN I HAVE EVER BEEN AGGRESSIVE TOWARDS ANYONE - APART FROM REPEATEDLY REACTING TO AGGRESSION STARTED BY HARRIET GROVE OR NICK MARTIN , IN ALMOST THREE YEARS I HAVE HAD - ZERO - ALTERCATIONS, ESPECIALLY FACE TO FACE ALTERCATIONS, WITH OTHER GUARDIANS.

ALL OF SUDDEN TRINA LEWIS IS TALKING ABOUT HER HUSBAND?
HOW UNPROFESSIONAL, GROSSLY INCOMPETENT AND TRAILER TRASH IS THAT!

I had already decided to simply forget and not react to HG’s first act of narcissism but HG had to go too far with her narcissism by causing NM to send me this wholly inappropriate message. This message that gullible NM sent to me as a result of him letting himself be used like a brainless tool by the racist narcissist Harriet Grove is what compelled me to send a complaint to Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis.
What HG and NM had done so far incontrovertibly proves that both of them had violated the aforementioned clause 5.8. I had done absolutely nothing wrong to anyone and there was no evidence of my wrong doing.

Please note that X, Y & Z include a single aggressive face to face confrontation - a confrontation instigated by Harriet Grove, not Nick Martin. With regards to the discriminatory way Ad Hoc eventually processed my complaint this aspect of this matter is quite relevant.

TRINA LEWIS IS A RACIST WHO NEEDS TO FEED HER RACISM. THAT IS WHY SHE EVENTUALLY ABSOLVED HER GUILTY FELLOW

CAUCASIAN HARRIET GROVE BUT GAVE ME, THE INNOCENT BLACK PERSON, A FORMAL WARNING.

Would you think that Trina Lewis’ would do something as bizarre as introduce her own husband as part of how she processed my complaint? That would be breathtakingly unprofessional, right?

Trailer Trash Racist Trina Lewis’ Reason for Introducing Her Husband into this Matter is Batshit Crazy

Because of what the concrete evidence proves whatever reason TL has to ‘justify’ completely absolving HG will have to be batshit crazy, right(?). TL ended up giving me an Ad Hoc formal warning called a Letter of Concern. You might imagine that for Trina Lewis to justify giving me a warning she would have to come up with a truly batshit crazy explanation to ‘justify’ such a warning you would not be wrong. There are two parts to the thought out convoluted way Trina Lewis decided to both completely absolve her fellow caucasian, Harriet Grove, of her aggressive narcissistic role in this matter AND issue me with a warning.

THIS IS THE BATSHIT RACIST ‘LOGIC’ THAT TRINA LEWIS EMPLOYED TO ‘JUSTIFY’ GIVING ME A FORMAL WARNING:

Part 1.
 TL informed me that because how badly HG had aggressively confronted me was no worse than how she (TL) treats her (TL’s) husband, HG was not guilty of having violated Ad Hoc’s aforementioned clause 5.8!

Put in other words, as long as HG’s bad behaviour is not worse than how TL badly treats her (TL’s) husband, the fact that HG violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8 can be completely ignored.

Part 2.
 Somehow, because of Part 1, because I had dared to complain about HG’s bad behaviour towards me AND because how badly HG had treated me is, supposedly, no worse than how badly TL treats her own husband, I deserve to be issued with that Letter of Concern formal warning. That is the surreal batshit crazy well thought out racist double standard that was employed to justify why I, and not HG, deserves a formal warning.

I have had decades of tens of encounters with racists like Trina Lewis. These encounters have/do me significant harm. I plan to ask a writer to detail these accounts in a book about racists that I have had the misfortune to have met. I do view Trina Lewis as trailer trash racist scum and the book will pay special attention to her racism towards me.

Trina Lewis So Unprofessionally Introducing How She Abuses Her Husband Proves Harriet Grove is An Agent of Ad Hoc’s Racism

There are several examples of how Ad Hoc employed Nick Martin and Harriet Grove as agents to subject me to discrimination that in effect is race based discrimination. Furthermore, how Ad Hoc used these two guardians as agents of their racism is why this matter quickly became akin to simply being subjected to the racism of four people that were employing a concerted effort to subject me to discrimination - as in there is no difference between the two of these racist people that are Ad Hoc employees and the two people that are Ad Hoc guardians. However, by a wide margin the best example of this concerted effort of these four racists to subject me to race based discrimination is best exemplified by the,

‘Empty the bins or I will tell Trina Lewis’

incident that is a provocative confrontation that was instigated by Harriet Grove, I think, more than a year after I was issued with that formal warning by TL. It is summarised below.

I should not have to state the following. During those two meetings that I had with Trina Lewis because she thought I would so easily let her get away with being discriminatory towards me she though her,

‘Harriet Grove’s behaviour towards you is only as bad as how I treat my own husband and that therefore means Harriett Grove is not guilty of anything but you are guilty and therefore deserving of an Ad Hoc Letter of Concern’

racism would never be publicised. For over two years I have asked her to justify how/why she so incompetently and unprofessionally introduced how she abuses her husband into this matter. In that time she has never - ever - denied that she introduced her husband into this matter nor has she ever denied that she introduced how she abuses her husband into this matter.

A Guardian & Guardian Interpersonal Relationship Is Quite Dissimilar to a Husband & Wife Interpersonal Relationship

The kind of appropriate relationship that ought to exist between guardians - guardians that Ad Hoc randomly recruits to live together in a building - must and ought to be quite dissimilar to the relationship that ought to exist between a husband and wife. Unlike Trina Lewis, this is a fact that is quite evident to most reasonably intelligent and unbiased person.

Please keep in mind how Trina Lewis in effect, made it clear that she , more or less, asserts that if how Harriet Grove treats me is no worse than how she (Trina Lewis) treats her husband then all is fine when you read details about the ‘Empty the bins or I will tell Trina Lewis’ incident.

If you do that you will come to realise that the ‘Empty the bins or I will tell Trina Lewis’ incident is perfect proof that what I have had to cope with is the concerted racist effort of two Ad Hoc employees and two Ad Hoc guardians.

Trina Lewis Issued Me With a Formal Warning - She Completely Absolved Harriet Grove of All Blame
Please view Document B1. It is a copy of the email TL sent to me that included an attachment that was a formal warning called a Letter of Concern - a copy of this is Document 40.

I viewed this warning as a precursor to possibly being evicted - over two years later as a result of me complaining about that same warning and the indirect and direct discrimination that was caused by that warning Ad Hoc applied to court for permission to evict me. Caucasians Nick Martin and Harriet Grove are not being evicted - it is me, the innocent black person, that is being evicted. That email that TL sent me also states that NM was at fault. However, the email made absolutely no mention whatsoever of Harriet Grove.

This Is How Quickly Trina Lewis’ Lost The Aforementioned Racist Bet That She Placed

I think that what happened next proves what I said about the aforementioned racist bet that TL placed - she believed the threat of eviction would cause me to not question her unjust formal warning. She was wrong. No matter what I will never ever be intimidated by the likes of trailer trash Trina Lewis or any of the other Ad Hoc racists. Never. So I sent her an email that politely asked her to both justify her actions and give the reason why I was issued with the formal warning; please see Document B2.

My email politely asked TL a few relevant and very credible questions.

As can be read from her reply to my email, please see Document B3 above, she refused to answer any of my questions. But in her reply she did threaten to escalate the action she could take against me.

Think about what Documents B1, B2 , B3 and that formal warning mean when taken altogether. They prove that TL/Ad Hoc had this much to do/say with regards to making the case that I had behaved badly towards others and therefore deserved to receive a warning. But Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc could not issue a single word to justify/explain why I was given this formal warning.

Furthermore, Document B1 has TL saying the following to me,

“If you wish to discuss this further, please give me a call or drop me an email”

Document B2 shows that I did want to discuss this further but TL completely ignored such a discussion by refusing to answer any of my questions. When You Stand Up To Bullies They Often Fall Like a Pack of Cards. As soon as I stood up to TL by asking her to justify her formal warning all her racist confidence fell away and she could not utter a single word to defend her own actions towards me. This often happens when one stands up to bullies.

Since Trina Lewis Issued Me with that Letter of Concern in 2021 Her Silence and the Totality of What She Has Said to Defend Herself Proves She Is As Unintelligent, Incompetent and Unprofessional As She is Racist

Trina Lewis in 2021.
Letter of Concern is issued. From 2021 to 2024 Trina Lewis steadfastly refused to justify issuing the Letter of Concern.

Trina Lewis Between 2021 and 2024.
 Total silence

Trina Lewis in 2024 During Court Hearing.
 During the court hearing because Trina Lewis’ aim is to cause me as much - additional - harm as possible the evidence she submitted to court included the following,

“Shina was quite aggressive in the meeting.
……. This email upset me because it accused me of being a racist which I am not. ….. All I was seeking to do was to help sort out the problems between guardians and was not treating people differently because of their race.”

Please keep in mind how Trina Lewis in effect, made it clear that she , more or less, asserts that if how Harriet Grove treats me is no worse than how she (Trina Lewis) treats her husband then all is fine when you read details about the ‘Empty the bins or I will tell Trina Lewis’ incident.

If the quote showing immediately above is true then why do documents B1 through to B3 include - NOT - a single word from Trina Lewis about my aggression?

NOTICE HOW THIS IS OVER TWO YEARS SINCE SHE GAVE ME THAT FORMAL WARNING ….. SHE WAITED THIS LONG TO ACCUSE ME FOR THE FIRST TIME OF AGGRESSION DURING THOSE MEETINGS ….. BUT SHE IS STILL REFUSING TO JUSTIFIED WHY SHE GAVE ME THAT WARNING NOR HAS SHE JUSTIFIED WHY HARRIET GROVE RECEIVED NO WARNING

As can be read from her reply to my email, please see Document B3 above, she refused to answer any of my questions. But in her reply she did threaten to escalate the action she could take against me.

One should ask, how on earth did two meetings about Harriet Grove’s proven aggression turn into a matter not about Harriet Grove’s aggression but instead about my - supposed aggression - that Trina Lewis so suspiciously refused to actually properly accuse me of until about three years later?

Trina Lewis moaning that she is not a racist while - for three bleeding years - steadfastly refusing to justify why she totally absolved HG and while steadfastly refusing to justify why she issued me with a formal warning makes absolutely no sense whatsoever! That silence speaks volumes - Trina Lewis is a bonafide vile and reprehensible racist.

Trina Lewis’ role as an Ad Hoc employee is supposed to be that of a professional and Ad Hoc’s role here is akin to a business that has me as a paying customer. As an Ad Hoc customer Trina Lewis is - obligated - to justify why she issued me with a formal warning or Letter of Concern or whatever the fuck Ad Hoc wants to call it! Is Trina Lewis such a dense vile racist that she does not know this(?) Or she knows but simply thinks she can easily get away with what she - MUST - know is her racism(?).

Trina Lewis has had over three years to pull back and do the right thing by putting an end to her racist plan to keep causing me harm - she should have done this by admitting that I did not deserve that 2021 formal warning. But because Trina Lewis wanted the court action to cause me to suffer more harm here she is in 2024 - AGAIN - falsely accusing me of being aggressive. Trina Lewis is trailer trash rabid racist scum.

It is the Aim of Racist Trina Lewis to Cause As Much Harm As Possible to Me. She is Still Resolutely Refusing to Admit that Harriet Grove Should Not Have Been Absolved of Her Culpability. Even As this Matter Proceeded to Court She Refused to Admit Her Race Based Discrimination. And All that Proves that Trina Lewis is Vile Racist Scum.

Trina Lewis is a disease - she represents the personification of the disease that is racism.

Stop Making A Fuss Over ‘A Little Bit of Discrimination’

In Document B3 Trina Lewis states,

“You were only issued a letter of concern …. Not a warning”

Eventually, how TL employed discrimination to process my complaint directly encouraged both NM and HG to continue to act aggressively towards me over the following period of more than two years. During that period I kept asking Ad Hoc to put a stop to their aggression but to no avail. During that period TL’s boss, Paul Thomson, also characterised that formal warning that I received as not being a more serious Ad Hoc warning - at different times Ad Hoc has asserted that the Letter of Concern that was issued to me is and is not a formal warning. I view how these two Ad Hoc employees seemed to want to convince me that I ought not complain about that formal warning as akin to perversely wanting to convince me that I should not complain about ‘a little discrimination’. The laws in the U.K. stipulate that any discrimination is unlawful - no discrimination is legally viewed as being trivial.

What Are The Chances Of Trina Lewis Losing Her Tongue So Quickly?

What are the chances that I accuse TL of issuing me with a formal warning because she is a racist AND I ask her to justify why she issued the warning AND TL simply cannot utter a single word to justify the warning AND she cannot issue a single word to deny that she is not a racist ? None of this is a coincidence. All of that is extremely predictable to me because my approach to how I am confronting Ad Hoc and doing my best to stop Ad Hoc from trampling all over my human rights is based on absolute logic. TL cannot defend her action because how I have interpreted what Ad Hoc is subjecting me to as racism is perfectly accurate. TL cannot justify giving me that formal warning because it is completely indefensible.

TL cannot credibly deny that she is not a racist because all the evidence that I have gathered screams,

‘Trina Lewis is a racist!’.

RACIST TRINA LEWIS IS IN GOOD COMPANY - THE COMPANY OF A ‘GOOD RACIST JUDGE

Trina Lewis’ reluctance to deny my accusation that she is a racist reminds me of a caucasian Bristol judge that I recently accused of being a racist - to make sure she received my accusation I employed the judge’s personal email address to deliver the accusation, I also sent the accusation to several other court officials/administrators. The accusation is searing; excoriating - I will include a copy of the accusation in the book about racists that I plan to have ghost written for me. Just like Trina Lewis that judge has never denied my accusation. No, I do not go around frivolously accusing all and sundry of being racist. There was a confluence of reasons that compelled me to conclude that the judge in question is a racist. The main reason is that during a court hearing - that she was presiding over - she actually did the equivalent of commit a crime against me and then employed the fruit of that crime as justification to rule against me. This is the U.K. where there is a ton of incontrovertible evidence that proves that racism is real and against that background this caucasian judge thought it was a good idea to treat me, a black person, how she did! I call racism!

She is a judge - if she is not a racist she ought to be able to put up a great argument to prove that I am playing the race card. But I have not had a single word of protest from her pathetic arse! She has not denied that she is a racist because she is a reprobate racist judge. Dumb as dog sh*t stupid arse racist judge!

It has to take a caucasian judge having a bucketload of prejudice against a black defendant to do what that judge did - I call racism! I know there are legal penalties for falsely accusing people of being racists - especially people that are judges. Despite that this idiotic racist judge has never ever done a damn thing about me so ‘publicly’ accusing her of being a racist because the evidence backs up my accusation. That judge is meekly tucking her tail between her legs and refusing to deny my accusation because she is a racist &/or she does not want to draw attention to the fact that the transcript of what transpired during the aforementioned court hearing proves she did the equivalent of commit a crime to justify ruling against me. That is a fact you can take to the bank. The account of what that racist judge did will be a main part of the aforementioned book that I will have written.

Trina Lewis issuing me with that Letter of Concern is an act of discrimination that is a race based hate crime.

No matter how many times I have asked, no one at Ad Hoc has ever put forth any explanation that resembles a logical justification that explains why I was served with that Letter of Concern - while Harriet Grove was completely resolved of her obvious culpability. The only most logical way to interpret why I received this Letter of Concern is racism.

With All This Evidence To Claim I Am Playing the Race Card Is Truly Moronic
The following is one of the ways racism is ignored and allowed to be continued. There will be evidence of indisputable discrimination that has been perpetuated by a person who is accused of being a racist. There will be very credible reasons to interpret the indisputable discrimination as racism. (1) The first thing that the accused racist will insist on is that the indisputable discrimination is not discrimination - TL claiming that giving me a formal warning and absolving HG is not discrimination is breathtakingly nonsensical. (2) There will be indisputable reason why the indisputable discrimination can be interpreted as race based discrimination - caucasian TL absolving guilty caucasian HG while the innocent black person, me, is given a formal warning is an indisputable reason to view TL’s discrimination as racial discrimination. (3) The third thing the racist will insist on is that because of (1) she/he could not possibly be a discriminatory or a racist. 1, 2 & 3 taken together very completely prove that no race card is being played by anyone - they prove discrimination that can credibly be interpreted as racism.

The Three Aspects of the Methodology Of Ad Hoc’s Over Three Years Long Racism

(A) Guilty Caucasian is Absolved of All Culpability. The first aspect of Ad Hoc’s racism centres around how HG was completely absolved of all of her culpability even though she was obviously guilty of violating Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8.

(B) The Innocent Black Person, Me, is Criminalised. The second aspect relates to how I was issued with a formal warning despite there being absolutely no evidence of any culpability on my part.

(C) The Red Herring Warning. The third aspect relates to how NM was given a red herring warning. Very early on I recognised this as a red herring. It is a red herring for the following two main reasons. Firstly, it was supposed to draw my attention away from how HG had been absolved. Secondly, it was supposed to fool me into thinking TL had fairly adjudicated my complaint. Furthermore, how Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc have completely ignored additional acts of aggression - committed AFTER said red herring warning was issued - that NM has subjected me to over the past three years, as summarised below, proves that whatever warning NM was given back in 2021 is a red herring. These additional acts of aggression include NM causing me to suffer at least one physical assault - Ad Hoc is studiously ignoring this aggression from NM, as summarised below.

Two Particular Aspects of Trina Lewis’ 2021 Racism That Were Indicators of the Racism to Come; Racism That Has Carried On Into 2024

Aspect One. Please look at Document B1 and consider the following quote from Trina Lewis,

“ ….. there were instances that you let him get the better of you …..

This is a bizarre thing for TL to say about NM. On the one hand she acknowledged that NM was more culpable than myself (even though I am not culpable at all). On the other hand she is stating that somehow NM’s aggression towards me is my fault. In Document B2 I asked TL to explain what she means by this and she completely ignored my question.

Especially because TL has completely refused to justify anything she has done/said with regards to issuing me with that formal warning, let me state what I believe this quote indicates. I believe TL said this because she believes that instead of Ad Hoc doing all it can to make sure that NM answers for violating its clause 5.8 by acting aggressively towards me, I ought to simply ignore his aggression &/or ‘take the law into my own hands’ by acting unilaterally to make NM stop his aggression towards me. It is as if with this quote TL is telling me that I should physically assault NM so as to stop him from getting to me. Either that or this quote from TL means I should indulge NM by simply being accepting of NM’s repeated acts of provocation and aggression towards me. In the three years since TL uttered this comment that is exactly what Ad Hoc has done with regards to NM additional acts of aggression - Ad Hoc has repeatedly indulged NM by excusing and encouraging his aggression towards me. Over the following three years NM additional acts of aggression towards me that Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc ignored included causing me to suffer at least two physical assaults, all this is summarised below.

Aspect Two. The way TL employed the seemingly abusive way she (TL) treats her (TL’s) husband to ‘justified’ absolving HG while she issued me with that formal warning was another indicator of what followed in the next three years. (With regards to how TL bizarrely introduced how she seemingly abuses her own husband as an excuse to completely absolved Harriet Grove of acting aggressively towards me - that makes it so much less surprising that HG went on to subject me to additional aggression that very much is akin to how an abusive wife might treat her husband, this is summarised below.

As early as 2021 when TL issued me with that Letter of Concern these two aspects are amongst other aspects of her racism that were clear indications of what was soon to come. And events proved me absolutely right.

Why Would Trina Lewis Not Take Up This Public Opportunity To Prove to All Guardians that She is Not A Vile and Reprehensible Racist?

TL can publicly prove to all guardians that she is not a racist by publicly answering at least two questions. Question 1: Despite my complaint to Ad Hoc - that is reproduced here - that mentions Harriet Grove’s involvement in this matter at least eight times; an involvement that proves that my complaint would be impossible if not for HG’s sh*t stirring narcissistic aggression, why did you decide that HG does not deserve a warning?

Question 2: The evidence shows I am not guilty of behaving aggressively towards any other guardians. With that being the case why did you issued me with that Letter of Concern warning? Answering these two question should be a very easy task for a person that is not a racist. TL might attempt to answer these questions, but if she does brace yourself for TL answering these two questions with the most absolutely nonsensical bullsh*t explanations. I am absolutely sure that the racist Trina Lewis will not be able to credibly answer these two questions and that proves that she is a trailer trash rabid racist.

TRINA LEWIS IS A RACIST AND LIKE MOST RACISTS SHE IS INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED

I predict that racist Trina Lewis will not publicly answer these two questions because it did not cross her mind that her imbecilic racist plan to use the threat of eviction to intimidate me would - not - work. If she was not so abysmally unintelligent her plan would have included how she would defend herself if I push back against her racism. Racists like Trina Lewis are not know for being intelligent.

Criminalising Innocent Black Person That Asks For Help is Chillingly Evil Ad Hoc Racism

Imagine how chillingly evil and racist it for an innocent black person to ask for help because that black person wants to stop being at the receiving end of the bad behaviour of others. Only to end up being criminalised because being black is equated to being a criminal. This is my reality - that is what Ad Hoc is subjecting me to right now. Over decades, this has happened to me countless times - above I have recounted one of the instances when this happened with racist police officers in Cardiff. Trina Lewis is a racist that is the personification of this kind of chillingly evil racism and so is Ad Hoc for so robustly aiding and abetting said racism.
Very Predictable Consequences of Me Receiving that Formal Warning
The proof that I provide below shows that me complaining about the ongoing aggression of these two is the direct cause of why Ad Hoc decided to retaliate against me by evicting me - that is right, Ad Hoc is evicting because I complained about the racism of NM, HG and Ad Hoc towards me.

Trina Lewis’ Boss, Paul Thomson, Self-Certifies Himself As A Breathtakingly Dishonest, Stupid And Incompetent Racist

Because TL steadfastly refused to explain/justify why she issued me with that Letter of Concern I asked for an explanation/justification from her boss, a Paul Thomson (PT). When I asked PT to get involved I made it clear that I believed TL was subjecting me to racism. PT had a copy of my complaint which means he knew very well that his subordinate, TL, absolving HG of her (HG’s) culpability with regards to my complaint is clearly incontrovertible discrimination. Despite that the ‘logic’ PT employed to ‘justify’ the formal warning issued to me by TL is as convoluted, dishonest, concerted and as ridiculous as TL’s ‘How HG acted towards you is no worse that how I abuse my husband and that is why she is to be absolved and you deserve a formal warning’ ‘logic’. Please view the document below that is a copy of an email I received from PT.

Let me respond to some of the points that PT raises in this email and then you decide if PT is or is not inadvertently self-certifying himself as a dishonest, stupid and incompetent racist.

From the very first paragraph PT is lying to defend TL. And I quote,

Quote no. 1 from PT:
“That you received a LoC for your part in an incident with NM that led to a confrontation.”

Question for PT:
What fucking incident with NM?

Above behold X, Y & Z - the incident/confrontation was with HG and not NM! The incident was a face to face confrontation with Harriet Grove that was instigated by her! There was no incident that caused me to file my complaint - incidents/confrontations instigated by NM came about after I filed my complaint!

Proving that this quote is totally inaccurate.
Please read the original complaint that I filed with Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc: this is reproduced above as document Exhibit TL1 pgs 55 to 57. This document was supplied for the court hearing by TL herself. This complaint of mine details that when I filed my complaint there had been one confrontation that Harriet Grove instigated against me, marked as (X) above - and not a confrontation with Nick Martin! PT here was doing exactly what TL was doing - doing all they can to make the breathtakingly dishonest and preposterous case that Harriet Grove is not involved in this matter. This PT quote from the same email makes the same dishonest point.

Quote no. 2 from PT:
“The LoC you were issued with on the 1st December 2021 was issued after an incident with NM”

Questions for Paul Thomson:

Again what incident with Nick Martin?

Because, Paul Thomson, is as racist as he is incompetent he is deliberately pretending that the confrontation was not with Harriet Grove and not instigated be Harriet Grove.

Question for PT:
Read that first message that NM sent to me that is part of the complaint that I filed with TL/Ad Hoc. Does it or does it not explicitly state that Harriet Grove is why NM sent that message to me?

Answer:
It explicitly states that HG caused NM to send me that message.

Question for PT:
In that message how many times does NM mention HG’s involvement?

Answer:
At least twice.

Question for PT:
Even though I did absolutely nothing to HG, in his message to me does NM not make it clear that HG is accusing me of bad behaviour?

Answer:
Yes he does

Question for PT:
With all of this concrete evidence, …… explain why you are falsely asserting that this matter only involves Nick Martin?

Take Paul Thomson’s Quotes no. 3 & no. 4 together:

PT Quote no. 3:
“The LoC was issued, as stated in the letter, for the breach of the following clause of your Licence Agreement, … “

PT Quote no. 4:
“In incidents such as these we find from experience that it is very rare that one person is completely blameless and has not engaged in any of the behaviours stated in the above clause.”

With Quote 4 Paul Thomson is Declaring Himself To Be As Grossly Unintelligent As He Is Grossly Racist

A person has to be truly dumb to freely put his/her name to Quote 4! With this quote Paul Thomson is asserting that the ‘justification’ for issuing me with that Ad Hoc formal warning is not because there is evidence of my wrong doing - and no such evidence exists because I have not acted badly towards anyone - but because Ad Hoc simply suspects my behaviour is as bad as badly behaved guardians of the past! This quote is proof of Ad Hoc’s discrimination. This quote is also proof of Paul Thomson’s incompetent and idiocy.

Paul Thomson is so incompetent and unintelligent to the extent that he does not know that his Quotes 3 & 4 completely contradict each other!

Quote 4 has PT inadvertently admitting that Ad Hoc knows there is no evidence I have done anything wrong - and indeed I did nothing wrong to anyone. But Quote 3 claims I breached clause 5.8 - I did no such thing. Quote 4 means Ad Hoc is admitting that it is subjecting me to incontrovertible discrimination.
Furthermore, it is not that far off from being an admittance of race based discrimination. Let me explain.

Let us imagine the following is ‘PT Quote no. 4’:
“In incidents such as these we find from experience that it is very rare that a black person is completely blameless and has not engaged in any of the behaviours stated in the above clause.”

If one is replaced with black and we then compare the real quote with the imaginary quote are both quotes not , more or less, as discriminatory as each other?

Here I am in a country that has laws against racism.
I am asserting that racism is why Trina Lewis issued me with that Letter of Concern - and why Harriet Grove never received any warning. And here is this idiot PT thinking it makes any sense whatsoever to tell me that there is no evidence I did anything wrong but I deserve the Letter of Concern because of the bad behaviour of guardians that came before me! This ‘justification’ given by PT is 100% discriminatory. It is almost as bad as stating that I deserve the Letter of Concern not because I have behaved badly but because there have been black guardians in the past that have behaved badly.

Paul Thomson’s Incompetence and Lack of Intelligence is Breathtaking

PT quote no. 4 perfectly encapsulates how grossly incompetent Paul Thomson is as a branch manager - to say something like this is breathtakingly unintelligent.

Paul Thomson’s Refusal to Explain Himself is Proof He is Attempting to Conceal the Racism He is Subjecting Me To

All Ad Hoc employees involved in this matter and Paul Thomson’s refusal to do something as simple as explain/justify these two quotes of his is a perfect example of the fact that these Ad Hoc racists are also cowards. Paul Thomson is a racist and a coward. You, Paul Thomson, are a grossly unintelligent and incompetent racist!

Intelligent 10 Year Olds Probably Understand the Legal Concept of Hearsay But Paul Thomson Does Not
(A) (A) If Paul Thomson has never seen me interact with other guardians at Kenwith Lodge then he cannot attest to whether I have behaved badly towards other guardians, right(?) (B) If Paul Thomson was not present at either of those two meetings that I had with Trina Lewis and Nick Martin then he cannot attest to whether I was aggressive during either of those two meetings, right (?) PT does not believe that both (A) & (B) are true, let me explain.

Quote no. 5 from PT:
“I cannot talk to your interactions in Kenwith House with other guardians , but it was felt that in your meeting with Nick and Trina that your behaviour , pacing around and raising your voice, did evidence some signs of aggression. “

Basically, PT is stupidly asserting that he cannot talk about how I interact with guardians at Kenwith Lodge - because he has never been present while I interacted with guardians at Kenwith Lodge. But, despite not having been present at either of those meetings with TL, he knows I behaved aggressively during those meetings because - TL told him so!

(Why the issue of my supposed aggression during those two meetings with Trina Lewis became a thing is a relevant aspect of Trina Lewis’ racism that I have summarised below)

Question for PT: Is it appropriate and acceptable for me to call you a pedophile rapist simply because Trina Lewis told me you are a pedophile rapist?

Because Paul Thomson is so racist and so dumb he thinks that AFTER I had told him I was being subjected to racism by his colleague Trina Lewis and AFTER I told him that part of that racism centres around Trina Lewis falsely accusing me of being aggressive, it is remotely appropriate for him to also accuse me of aggression - because, wait for it, Trina Lewis told him I acted aggressively! To do that is as appropriate as me accusing PT of being, say, a pedophile rapist simply because Trina Lewis told me that PT is a pedophile rapist. That is hearsay - morally, legally and intellectually it is totally unacceptable to claim something that you did not witness is true simply because someone you trust told you it is true!
I TAKE DEEP DEEP FUCKING OFFENCE AT THE LIKES OF RACISTS LIKE TRINA LEWIS AND PAUL THOMSON INDULGING IN TYPICAL RACIST BEHAVIOUR BY DEHUMANISING ME, A BLACK PERSON, BY FALSELY ACCUSING ME OF AGGRESSION - WHILE IGNORING THE INCONTROVERTIBLE AGGRESSION OF THEIR FELLOW CAUCASIANS HARRIET GROVE & NICK MARTIN.

Paul Thomson’s Refusal to Explain Himself is Proof He is Attempting to Conceal the Racism He is Subjecting Me To

Quote no. 5 from PT:
“That you have not been given a reason for this LoC.”


Question for PT:
Look at the aforementioned Documents B1, B2 & B3 copies of which I have provided above, do these documents not conclusively prove that Trina Lewis has refused to give me a reason as to why she issued me with that Letter of Concern?

Question for PT:
Actually, TL did give a reason; the husband reason. The only reason that Trina Lewis gave me during those meetings is the perverse racist reason based on her belief that I deserve the Letter of Concern because I should not have complained about how Harriet Grove aggressively confronted me because that behaviour is not worse than how badly she (TL) abuses her (TL’s) husband. I have lost count of how many times I have complained to Ad Hoc about how TL involved the dysfunctional and seemingly abusive way she treats her husband into this matter. Ad Hoc has steadfastly refused to state whether TL doing this is a professional and appropriate way for her (TL) to manage my complaint.

Question for PT:
Why have you never ever had anything to say about this ‘Husband’ reason that Trina Lewis has given for why she issued me with that Letter of Concern? Paul Thomson if you are not a cowardly racist this is your opportunity to answer this question???

Behold the following racist double standard of Paul Thomson,

Behold the following racist double standard of Paul Thomson:

The Standard for Caucasian Harriet Grove - Completely Ignore Indisputable Evidence That Proves Harriet Grove Violated Ad Hoc’s Clause 5.8

Please digest the contents of document Exhibit TL1 pgs 55 to 57. This includes that message that Nick Martin sent to me - a message that totally proves that Harriet Grove’s sh*t stirring is what caused me to have to complain at all. Ad Hoc ignored that concrete evidence - Harriet Grove is completely absolved of her incontrovertible culpability and received no warning whatsoever. PT completely ignores this rock solid proof of HG’s culpability.

The Standard for Black Me - Manufacture Convoluted and False Reasons to Attempt to Assert That I Violated Ad Hoc’s Clause 5.8

Now compare that to the truly discriminatory way Paul Thomson went about twisting himself into a pretzel as he attempted to manufacture something that resembles justification for why I was given that Letter of Concern.

And I quote,…
Quote no. 6 from PT:
“While you may feel you had not done anything which resulted in harm , injury or alarm or distress it was felt on the balance of probability and given your behaviour in the meeting that you did share some blame in escalating issues in the property…. You were issued with Letter of Concern for this ….. ”

 There is also the following quote from PT that I already cited above,

“I cannot talk to your interactions in Kenwith House with other guardians , but it was felt that in your meeting with Nick and Trina that your behaviour , pacing around and raising your voice, did evidence some signs of aggression. “

Questions for PT:
Why have you completely ignored concrete evidence of Harriet Grove having violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8? While on the other hand you are so desperately fabricating nonsensical reasons to make the case that I violated that very same clause, why?

Falsely Accusing Innocent Black People of Being Aggressive Is A Centuries Old Pattern of Racism Straight Out Of the Racists’ Playbook.

Innocent unarmed black persons that have been murdered/shot by police officers in countries like the USA and the U.K. are extreme examples of how harmful the racism of labelling innocent black people as aggressive can be. Like true racists Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson falsely accused me of being aggressive.

Quote from PT:
“That you have baselessly been accused of aggression.”

Let me explain why the question of my supposed aggression became a significant part of this matter and how that ended up including the quote from PT that is showing immediately above. Above, under the Trina Lewis Employs Her Own Racism to Justify Her Own Racism And Then Employs All That to Justify Accusing Me of Being Aggressive section I explained the vile racist reason that caused Trina Lewis to falsely accuse me of being aggressive during those two meetings. This is a page from the evidence that Trina Lewis submitted to court for the court hearing on 21/2/24.

I want to draw attention to this quote,
“Shina was quite aggressive in the meeting. He got up and started pacing around the room. He kept raising his voice and I had to explain to him that he is being perceived as aggressive and asked that he sit down”

None of this is true at all; I did not act aggressively towards anyone during either of those meetings with TL and NM.

It Has Taken Trina Lewis Only Three Years to Respond to My Email

Documents B1 through to B3, that are showing above, prove that TL refused to respond when in early 2022 I asked her why she falsely accused me of being aggressive during those two aforementioned 2021 meetings. It has taken this court action in 2024 for her for the very first time to give any explanation as to why she accused of being aggressive. I mean that is not suspicious at all, is it(?). One of the most vile and disgustingly racist things that racists like Trina Lewis do is act in a racially discriminatory and provocative manner and then falsely claim the minority is being aggressive when the minority politely pushes back against the racial provocation. I have experienced this on 10s of occasions - including at the hands of police officers and when I have sought medical care from doctors (twice!). With regards to this over two year long Ad Hoc matter, to the very best of my knowledge, the only party that has ever done the right thing; by writing and filing a complaint with Ad Hoc, is myself. Therefore what Trina Lewis is claiming is that although I am levelheaded, calm and civil enough to write and file a formal complaint against Nick Martin and Harriet Grove I arrived at the meeting to discuss said complaint and then suddenly turned into someone that, as opposed to being calm enough to write and file a formal complaint, I became unreasonably aggressive. This is racist hogwash; absolute dishonest bs!

Exposing Trina Lewis’ False Accusation That I Acted Aggressively

Please digest the contents of documents B1, B2 & B3 again, they appear above. In the TL quote immediately above look how eloquently TL has asserted that I was aggressive during the meetings; she states that I was not just aggressive but quite aggressive. Now consider these two facts:

Fact 1: In Document B1 TL makes no mention whatsoever of my aggression during the meetings.

Fact 2: Document B2 has me specifically asking TL about my supposed aggression, both towards other guardians and during those meetings with TL.

Fact 3: Document B3 is TL’s response to Document B2. Her response makes absolutely no mention of my aggression.
If I was really aggressive during those meetings what possible reason would TL have to - not - mention this aggression at all a mere few days after those two meetings? What possible justifiable reason would there be for the communication represented by documents B1 through to B3 not include TL uttering at least one word about her claim that I was quite aggressive if, indeed I had actually been aggressive during either of those two key meetings? The answer is there is no such justifiable reason.

These three Facts are proof that TL’s accusation of my aggression during those meeting is completely false. The reason why these three facts exist is because how TL reprehensibly and falsely accused me of aggression during that meeting was meant to be a racist means to absolve Harriet Grove of her huge culpable involvement in this matter - as opposed to being a real act of aggression on my part that TL is really willing to recount. During those two meetings TL falsely accused me of being aggressive because she was not happy because I pushed back against her racist and absurd claim that Harriet Grove has nothing to do with what caused me to complain to Ad Hoc - that is why for three years TL completely failed to bring herself to utter a single word to explain how I was supposedly aggressive during those two meetings, the aggression she referred to is a figment of her racist imagination.

CONSIDER SOME OF THE INSTANCES OF NICK MARTIN’S AGGRESSION TOWARDS ME, AS SUMMARISED BELOW, AND THEN ASK. WHO IS THE REAL AGGRESSOR? WHO IS THE PROVOCATEUR? IS IT EQUITABLE THAT I AND NOT NICK MARTIN IS THE GUARDIAN THAT AD HOC WISHES TO EVICT?

** Nick Martin Video Recording Me In The Kitchen / Ad Hoc Turned a Blind Eye to This**

The document shown above was supplied by TL for the 21/2/24 court hearing. It is an email message that is dated around 4th November 2021 and it details me complaining to TL that NM had been video recording me while I was in the kitchen at 11.45am making a cup of tea. Video recording me in the kitchen is an act of provocative aggression; I have the right to not have to put up with such behaviour. I did not respond aggressively to this act of provocation. I simply complained to Ad Hoc. Earlier I summarised how TL quite clearly made it clear to NM that she was comfortable with him video recording me in such a manner.

** Nick Martin Pins ‘Grow Up’ Note On My Door / Ad Hoc Turned a Blind Eye to This**

Please look at the documents showing immediately above. I caught NM pining this ‘Grow Up’ note to my door. This happened several months after I had been issued with that Letter of Concern formal warning - NM was encouraged to continue to provoke me because of that Letter of Concern. I do not practise or believe in physical aggression. But it took so much for me to - not - knock him out when I caught him doing this. H3 is an email that TL sent to me. In this H3 email TL is stating that she is ignoring my complaint about this ‘Grow Up’ note and another act of aggression that revolves around HG ordering me to empty bins. The matter of Harriet Grove ordering me to empty bins is probably the most glaring example that proves that the racism that I have been suffering at the hands of Ad Hoc for over three years is the result of five racists - three Ad Hoc employees and two Ad Hoc guardians - working hand hand in an effort to discriminate against me, this is detailed below. H3 is yet more proof that Ad Hoc/ Trina Lewis refused to do anything to stop how NM and HG kept repeatedly subjecting me to aggressive provocation between 2021 and 2024. Here was that race based double standard at play again - concrete evidence of the bad behaviour of NM &/or HG towards me was almost always ignored by Ad Hoc. But the same Ad Hoc repeatedly went out of its way to fabricate false evidence in an attempt to make the case that I was the person being provocative/aggressive towards others.

** Nick Martin Scalds Me With Boiling Hot Tea / Ad Hoc Turned a Blind Eye to This Too **

The document above is one of the pieces of evidence that Paul Thomson submitted to court for the court hearing of 21/2/24. It represents proof that I complained to Ad Hoc about suffering the physical assault of being scalded by boiling hot tea as a direct result of NM’s aggression. Here is PT both trivialising the seriously incendiary atmosphere he had helped create and the physical assault that I suffered as a result of that.

The document showing above was also supplied to court by PT. It shows that the following is part of his response to NM scalding me with boiling hot tea,
“I know that these have escalated on several occasions to apparently some sort of minor scuffle between Nick Martin and Shina”

After Nick Martin Scalded Me With Boiling Hot Tea Paul Thomson Did Not Evict Him or Move Him (NM) to a Room Away From Me Instead He Said This,

Quote of PT:
“ In my opinion, Ad Hoc has done everything it can to facilitate you both to live harmoniously in the property”

Question for PT:
Why do you think my being scalded with boiling hot tea is a ‘minor scuffle’? The only reason why this matter did not turn into a much more serious matter is because of how, again, I marshalled great control by resisting the urge to physically batter Nick Martin and I did that because I am not an aggressive person.

PLEASE REMEMBER THAT EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO COURT BY TRINA LEWIS, THAT IS SHOWN ABOVE AS Exhibit TL1 pg 58 PROVES THAT THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME NICK MARTIN HAD ACTED PROVOCATIVELY/ AGGRESSIVELY TOWARDS ME SIMPLY BECAUSE I WAS IN THE KITCHEN MAKING A CUP OF TEA - I THINK IT WAS AT LEAST OVER A YEAR EARLIER THAT TRINA LEWIS HAD MADE EXCUSES TO JUSTIFY NICK MARTIN VIDEO RECORDING WHILE I WAS MAKING A CUP OF TEA.

Paul Thomson Should Explain Why Was Nick Martin Not Evicted As a Result of him Video Recording Me Making a Cup of Tea in the Kitchen AND Scalding Me With Boiling Hot Tea?


Paul Thomson has preposterously claimed that there is no way of knowing who is telling the truth about what led up to my being scalded by boiling hot tea. By the time NM caused me to be scalded with boiling hot tea Ad Hoc was well aware of several historical acts of provocation/aggression of his towards me - complaining about my breathing, video recording me while I was in the kitchen, sending me inappropriate messages, pining a ‘Grow Up’ note on my door etc. Meanwhile there was absolutely no historical evidence of my provocation/aggression toward NM or anyone else. There was absolutely no reason for Ad Hoc to not think that causing me to be scalded with boiling hot tea ought to be the last act of aggression that should have been cause for Ad Hoc to evict Nick Martin. But racist Ad Hoc did not do that because its target was me the innocent black person.

Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson Were Perfectly Comfortable with the Possibility of Blood Being Spilt.

Ad Hoc issued me with that totally unjust formal warning. In the three years after that, additional acts of provocation/aggression from Harriet Grove and NIck Martin were contributing to an escalating incendiary atmosphere that any reasonable person would have known could result in someone suffering serious physical harm. All that did not matter to Ad Hoc. It seems that Ad Hoc preferred to sit back in the hope that further acts of provocations from NM &/or HG would lead to me actually responding with actually incontrovertible aggression thereby giving Ad Hoc the opportunity to employ such aggression as a means to, albeit retrospectively, claim that it was right for it to have issued me with said formal warning way back in 2021. Put in other words, NM causing me grievous bodily harm, or vice versa, was of much less relevance to Ad Hoc than the possibility of proving that I am aggressive. That notion that Ad Hoc was comfortable to see blood spilt is no more outrageous that the fact that despite my innocence I was issued with a formal warning by Ad Hoc. The following acts of provocation that Ad Hoc also simply ignored supports this notion.

TRINA LEWIS AND PAUL THOMSON PREFERRED TO SEE BLOOD SPILT THAN DO SOMETHING TO DEESCALATE THE POWDER KEG ATMOSPHERE THAT THEY HAD DELIBERATELY CREATED.

** To Spy On Me Nick Martin Unilaterally Installs Camera In Kitchen / Ad Hoc Turned a Blind Eye to This Too **

Another Example Proves Ad Hoc Gave Nick Martin Carte Blanche to Repeatedly Act Aggressively Towards Me

A mere few days after NM scalded me with hot tea - because Ad Hoc’s had again done nothing about how he scalded me with boiling hot tea - he was encouraged/emboldened to instigate a new act of provocation. For two years it has always been my modus operandi to minimise conflict with Harriet Grove and Nick Martin by avoiding both of them like the plague. Conversely, this duo would not stop attempting to force me to interact with them. My wanting to avoid NM is why when he started rambling to me about a camera in the kitchen I walked away from him without fully understanding what he had said to me. It never crossed my mind that a guardian would be so audacious as to unilaterally install a camera in an Ad Hoc kitchen. This is why I very clearly remember contacting Ad Hoc by email to ask if NM had been informed by Ad Hoc that a camera will be installed in the kitchen to spy on me - I have not been able to find that particular email but I most definitely send Ad Hoc such an email. The point I am making is that if a camera were to then appear in the kitchen it would be totally dishonest for Ad Hoc to pretend that it did not know that Nick Martin is the person who unilaterally installed it. Such dishonesty would be the latest example of Ad Hoc, again, over two years long, discrimination of turning a blind eye to the repeated acts of provocation/aggression of NM (& HG) towards me. That is exactly what did Ad Hoc did as attested to by these quotes,

Paul Thomson & Trina Lewis Pretend They Do Not Know Nick Martin Unilaterally Placed Camera in Kitchen to Spy On Me

“In January 2023 Shina reported that a camera had been put up in the kitchen at Kenwith Lodge. Trina sent an email out to all guardians and we did not receive any further complaints.”
&

“In January 2023 Shina alerted Ad Hoc that a camera had been put in one of the kitchens. This is not Ad Hoc’s practices. I responded to his email. I also sent an email out to all guardians on the same day and asked that whoever installed the camera to remove it. I did not hear from Shina again that there was still a camera up at the property”

I was informed that on one of Ad Hoc’s Whatapp group chats a huge argument had broken out between NM and other guardians because the other guardians were angry that the camera he had installed would spy on all that come to the kitchen, and not just me. Every one and his dog knew that NM unilaterally installed that camera. Despite that here are these two Ad Hoc employees pretending that they did not know that NM unilaterally installed that camera in the kitchen with the aim of spying on me - plus I had literarily, more or less, informed them that NM planned to install a camera. This pretence is part and parcel of Ad Hoc’s two years long conduct of steadfastly ignoring repeated acts of provocation and aggression that I suffer at the hands of NM or HG. Basically, TL and PT are attempting to make the case that it is plausible that they did not know that NM installed that camera in the kitchen AND they were never ever curious enough to ever personally come to the kitchen to investigate whether the camera was still in the kitchen or not.

All this happened to me and so I know it is real. Despite that, when I think about Nick Martin’s repeated aggression that Ad Hoc has robustly allowed to continue over the past three years this all seems so surreal and unbelievable. THEN THIS HAPPENED ……. Nick Martin was not done taking advantage of the fact that Ad Hoc has more or less given him 100% permission to continue being aggressive towards me,….

WHILE AD HOC IS IN THE MIDDLE OF EMPLOYING THE COURT SYSTEM TO EVICT ME ….. I AM ABSOLUTELY SURE NICK MARTIN PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED ME WITH A CHAIR …..

Ad Hoc started legal proceedings to evict me around the end of September 2023. A few days after this as I walked into the kitchen Nick Martin almost deliberately bumped into me. I believe that as I walked into the kitchen he noticed that there was no one in the kitchen - so he knew I was the only person in the kitchen. I closed the door of the kitchen. A few seconds later I opened the door to leave the kitchen and a chair feel on my foot. This is the sight that confronted me,..

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that NM deliberately set this folding chair-box contraption up with the aim of physically assaulting me. In the preceding three years there have only ever been two guardians - Harriet Grove & Nick Martin - that have repeatedly acted in a provocative/aggressive manner towards me and of those two NM is the one whose modus operandi perfectly aligns with this physical assault. HG’s provocation/aggression has always centred around creating conflict by means of provocative verbal narcissism. The deliberate act of assaulting me with the chair fits in with NM’s other confirmed acts of gross provocation and aggression i .e the ‘Grow Up’ note incident, video recording me in the kitchen, sending me inappropriate messages, complaining about my breathing, the tea scalding incident, the camera incident etc. I am absolutely certain that that chair falling on my foot is the second physical assault I have suffered as a result of Nick Martin’s aggression - the first incident being when I was scalded with boiling hot tea. Ad Hoc must have arrived at the same conclusion that only NM could have set up this chair trap. I complained about the chair assault to Ad Hoc and that included detailing why it could not have been caused by anyone else but NM. But as has always been the case for the past three years Ad Hoc simply ignored this assault and then simply continued with the process of legally getting me evicted.

For over two years Ad Hoc has repeatedly attempted to paint me as a guardian that is aggressive towards other guardians. However, the evidence proves three main facts.
FACT 1. Firstly, there is no evidence of me ever provoking others or being aggressive towards others.
FACT 2. Secondly, all the evidence proves that it was others that kept being aggressive and provocative towards me.
FACT 3. Lastly, for three years I have been forced to repeatedly react to the provocation/aggression of others towards me.

Falsely Accusing Black People of Being Aggressive is What Racists Do

Here is Trina Lewis Falsely Accusing Me of Being Aggressive.

“Managing Kenwith Lodge has been quite difficult because Shina has upset quite a lot of people. I have a practice when managing guardians , and not just Shina, that I do not take action unless I have evidence as a lot of the complaints by guardians are based on conjecture”

This quote is a falsehood. I have lived as an Ad Hoc guardian for almost three years. If this quote were true then there would have to be evidence of a record of communication between myself and TL in relation to her (TL) having had to contact me with regards to how I had been upsetting quite a lot of people. Such a record does not exist. If this quote were true TL would have had to arrange to have meeting with me in relation to at least person that had complained to Ad Hoc about how I had upset her/him. In three years I never had such a meeting with TL. In fact in those three years I have only ever set eyes on TL a total of , I think, three times - that includes the two aforementioned meetings I had with her as a result of my having filed a complaint with regards to Nick Martin and Harriet Grove acting aggressively towards me. Put in other words, if one removes those two meetings, in three years I have never ever had to meet TL to have discussions with her as a result of having upset quite a lot of people.

Trina Lewis said,
“ ….that I do not take action unless I have evidence as a lot of the complaints by guardians are based on conjecture”

I might be spoilt for choice with regards to proving that this quote from Trina Lewis is absolutely dishonest - and breathtakingly absurd when you consider available evidence . For example, she completely and totally ignored concrete evidence that proves that her fellow caucasian Harriet Grove acted aggressive towards me and is therefore guilty of having violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8. This is a provable fact when one considers the very evidence, that is Exhibit TL1 pages 55 to 57 that is shown above, evidence that Trina Lewis herself submitted to court.

Question for the Trina Lewis:
That message that mentions Harriet Grove by name that Nick Martin sent to me and that is part of the complaint that I sent to you very clearly represents unassailable concrete evidence - not conjecture - that proves that Harriet Grove violated Ad Hoc’s clause 5.8. With that being the case why is it that you issued myself and not Harriet Grove with a Letter of Concern formal warning? For almost three years like a cowardly racist you have refused to answer this simple and relevant question.

Here is Paul Thomson Falsely Accusing Me of Being Aggressive/Having Had Heated Arguments with Different Guardians.

“ I know there have been a few incidents of heated arguments with Shina and different guardians regarding all sorts of different issues from noise to taking the bins out and general shared building day to day arguments.

This is not true at all - I have not had heated arguments with different guardians regarding all sorts of different issues - and I can prove this is not true. In court documents that I submitted to court I accused both Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson of being racists and those documents included evidence that proves they are racists. With that being the case TL and PT had very good reason to want to do their best to completely and totally assassinate my character. Put in other words, TL and PT had every reason to submit to court all evidence that they could lay they hands on that proves my accusation that they are racists should not be believed. However, both TL and PT have never ever been able to produce any evidence whatsoever to back up these quotes about my supposed aggression.

76 Pages of Evidence that Trina Lewis Submitted to Court Includes Absolutely No Credible Evidence that Relates to Me Upsetting Anyone
I have kept copies of the 76 pages of evidence provided by Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc that were submitted to court for the court hearing on 21/2/24. These 76 pages are replete with evidence of my complaints about the bad behaviour of Nick Martin and Harriet Grove towards me - but no credible evidence/ mention of any account from any guardian complaining of me upsetting anyone. Trina Lewis’ accusation of me upsetting quite a lot of people is nothing but the typical false accusation that racists are known to level against innocent black people. That is why she could not submit to court any evidence whatsoever of me upsetting anyone - let alone a lot of people.

36 Pages of Evidence that Paul Thomson Submitted to Court Includes Absolutely No Credible Evidence that Relates to His Quote About Me
Having Arguments with Different Guardians I have kept copies of the 36 pages of evidence provided by Paul Thomson/ Ad Hoc that were submitted to court for the court hearing on 21/2/24. The reason why none of these 36 pages show credible evidence of heated arguments that I have had with different guardians regarding all sorts of different issues is because that quote from PT is a racist lie. Just like TL, PT’s quote is the typical false accusation that racists are known to level against innocent black people. That is why the evidence he submitted to court contradicts this quote of his. The evidence collectively submitted to court does not include any written accounts of complaints submitted to Ad Hoc about my bad conduct AND does not include any credible communication that Ad Hoc sent to me about my bad behaviour towards other guardians AND does not include records of meeting I ought to have had with Ad Hoc representative to discuss my bad conduct towards other guardians AND Ad Hoc did not present any guardians in court who might have given verbal accounts of how badly I had treated them etc.

I Reckon Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson Think,

‘No way am I a racist, it is the other people that are the racists‘

Yes, you are the racists! Several aspects of the conduct of the likes of Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson towards me reeks of racism. That includes falsely accusing me of behaviour akin to aggression/straight up accusing me of aggression - such accusations are a hallmark of the behaviour of racists towards innocent black people. I have had decades of having to cope with being subjected to experiences that can credibly be interpreted as racism engendered experiences. This has compelled me to recognise a number of patterns of how racism is manifested. One of those patterns is that I think people like Harriet Grove, Nick Martin, Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright believe that it is only other people that are racists. No, Harriet Grove, Nick Martin, Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright are the racists. Remember, I made each of these people aware that I believed they were subjecting me to racism - whatever the case may be that ought to have been cause for each one of them to stop being discriminatory &/or aggressive &/or provocative towards me. Instead each one of them continued in their inexcusable provocative/aggressive behaviour towards me. That is akin to one self-certify oneself as a racist.

Ad Hoc’s Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson Had Almost 3 Years to Gather Evidence of My Supposed Bad Behaviour Towards Others But Failed To Proffer Any Credible Evidence Whatsoever

I have lived as an Ad Hoc guardian amongst about 95 other guardians for almost three years. That is a significantly long enough period of time for Ad Hoc to both become aware of my bad behaviour towards others - if that is a reality and it most definitely is not - and have some evidence, any evidence of said bad behaviour. Trina Lewis or Paul Thomson cannot produce any credible evidence whatsoever that reflects the egregious things they each said about my character. The closest thing that approximates to incontrovertible evidence of my actual aggression towards others over a period of three years is Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson simply verbally asserting that I am aggressive, that is it.

Paul Thomson’s Accusation that Centres Around Bins Reeks of Desperate and a Grossly Preposterous Racism
If one needs further proof that PT is racially and falsely accusing me of being aggressive it stems from the part of PT’s quote that accuses me of having had heated arguments with other guardians with regards to taking the bins out. As I have summarised below, this accusation that centres around bins is as blatantly and brazenly racist as it is a grossly preposterous accusation to level against me. It is a preposterous accusation because the only argument with regards to taking bins out that I had with a guardian demonstrably and indisputable proves that a guardian was acting provocatively/aggressively towards me - I merely reacted to the provocation/aggression. I believe this particular evidence that centres around that bin incident, evidence that Ad Hoc went out of its way to submit to court, is such an own goal I call it the “Let’s Hope the judge is as racist as we are” evidence.

36 Pages of Evidence that Paul Thomson Submitted to Court Includes Absolutely No Credible Evidence that Relates to His Quote About Me
Having Arguments with Different Guardians I have kept copies of the 36 pages of evidence provided by Paul Thomson/ Ad Hoc that were submitted to court for the court hearing on 21/2/24. The reason why none of these 36 pages show credible evidence of heated arguments that I have had with different guardians regarding all sorts of different issues is because that quote from PT is a racist lie. Just like TL, PT’s quote is the typical false accusation that racists are known to level against innocent black people. That is why the evidence he submitted to court contradicts this quote of his. The evidence collectively submitted to court does not include any written accounts of complaints submitted to Ad Hoc about my bad conduct AND does not include any credible communication that Ad Hoc sent to me about my bad behaviour towards other guardians AND does not include records of meeting I ought to have had with Ad Hoc representative to discuss my bad conduct towards other guardians AND Ad Hoc did not present any guardians in court who might have given verbal accounts of how badly I had treated them etc.
I Reckon Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson Think,

To Justify Evicting Me Ad Hoc Should Produce Evidence of My Behaviour That is Much Worse Than the Incontrovertible Provocative/ Aggressive Behaviour of the Two Caucasian Guardians - Harriet Grove and Nick Martin - that are Not Being Evicted

I have presented incontrovertible evidence here that proves that both Nick Martin and Harriet Grove were, collectively, repeatedly being aggressive and provocative towards me. I have asserted this is because, over a period of over three years, what I was subjected to was the equivalent of being subjected to race based discrimination as a result of a concerted effort of five people; two caucasian guardians, Nick Martin & Harriet Grove, and two Ad Hoc employees, Trina Lewis ,Paul Thomson & Simon Wright (Simon Wright became involved from around September 2023). Ad Hoc has denied subjecting me to racism and yet here I am, the only black person involved in this matter, being evicted - to the best of my knowledge neither NM or HG is being evicted or facing any serious sanction from Ad Hoc. If evicting me is justified then it must be the case that neither NM or HG is the subject of this kind of court action eviction because my conduct towards the two of them/ other guardians must be much worst than the incontrovertible provocations/ aggressions of NM and HG. One way Ad Hoc can prove evicting me is not part a pattern of discrimination; race based discrimination, is for it to produce evidence of said worst behaviour from me. A totality of 111 pages of evidence collectively submitted to court by TL and PT does not include a single page of evidence, or even a single word of evidence, that proves I am guilty of bad behaviour towards anyone.

Ad Hoc/ PL , Again, Falsely Accuses Me Of Aggression And Issues Me Another Formal Warning.

The document showing immediately above is a formal warning that PL issued to me without telling what I had supposedly done to deserve it or how/who I had supposedly treated badly to deserve this warning. This warning is different from and in addition to the aforementioned Ad Hoc Letter of Concern formal warning that had been issued to me about half a year earlier. PL giving me a chance to defend myself against whatever caused him to issue me with this formal warning most definitely ought to have preceded, possibly, issuing me with this formal warning. After all, most reasonably competent and intelligent people are equitable enough to know that giving a person a chance to defend themselves against any type of accusation is part of the bedrock of justice. PL is clearly not familiar with this concept &/or maybe he is but that was overridden by him being unable to resist the urge to continue his pattern of being wholly discriminatory towards me. What PL did is blatantly unjust and similar to a court officially labelling an innocent citizen as an aggressive citizen without allowing said citizen any kind of defence against such an accusation. The evidence that PL referred to with regards to why he issued me with this formal warning is very likely to have been provided by NM or HG. After all, no other guardians, of many, have been intolerant of my existence and so aggressive towards me as this duo. So NM or HG provided Ad Hoc with said evidence and Ad Hoc - without giving me a chance to defend myself and without telling me who had complained about my conduct - proceeds directly from receiving said evidence to issuing me with a formal warning. Does that not seem like yet another aspect of this matter that strongly suggests Ad Hoc employees, TL & PL, were engaged in a concerted effort with NM & HG to deliberately adversely affect my existence?

CLEARLY MY SUPPOSED AGGRESSION IS INEFFECTIVE BECAUSE HARRIET GROVE AND NICK MARTIN KEEP ATTACKING ME!

Questions for Ad Hoc:

Who is the aggressor? For three years NM and HG have not been deterred from continuing to subject me to provocation and aggression …. my supposed aggression is clearly not effective. My aggression is ineffective because it does not exist. It is a racist fabrication that only exists in the rabid racist minds of Trina Lewis, Paul Thomson and Simon Wright.

Warning Issued to Nick Martin is Veritable Red Herring.

Does Ad Hoc’s steadfast refused to stop Nick Martin’s aggression towards me suggest that the warning that Ad Hoc supposedly issued to Nick Martin back in 2021 is a real warning or a red herring warning? Does Ad Hoc’s steadfast refused to stop Nick Martin’s aggression towards me suggest it was biased against me and deliberately fomenting an incendiary atmosphere that it knew could lead to someone getting physically hurt or was it acting as an unbiased peace promoting entity? The warning that NM received in 2021 is a red herring warning. Let me point out two aspects that highlight the fact that it is a red herring warning.
Red Herring Warning Aspect 1: Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis meant for that warning to be a smokescreen to draw attention away from the egregious and grossly discriminatory fact that wholly culpable Harriet Grove was totally absolved.
Red Herring Warning Aspect 2: In the two years since he was issued with the warning NM’s aggression towards me has increased in intensity - the Grow Up, Tea Scalding, Camera and Chair acts of aggression from NM all came after he was issued with that warning in 2021 - and that is despite the supposed warning he received in about 2021/early 2022. The warning has not deterred NM at all because it is a red herring warning; a warning in name only. Since Ad Hoc issued NM with that warning in 2021 it has resolutely refused to act to put a stop to NM’s aggression towards me while at the same time Ad Hoc kept fabricating discriminating reasons to accuse me of being the aggressor. That over two years long campaign of discrimination culminated in Ad Hoc applying to court to evict me. Back in 2021 when I was informed that NM had been issued with a warning there were a number of reasons that compelled me to believe that the warning is a red herring - one such reason was, as summarised earlier, how right in front of me during those two 2021 meetings that TL had with NM and myself, she (TL) kept making excuses to justify each of NM’s acts of provocation/aggression towards me. The way Ad Hoc has refused to put a stop to NM’s aggression since 2021 is another reason that proves I was right to immediately recognise the warning as a red herring. Remember how I detailed that back in 2021 Trina Lewis made this odd statement about Nick Martin,

“ ….. there were instances that you let him get the better of you …..”

The repeated aggression of Nick Martin, that Ad Hoc has refused to act against in the two years after Trina Lewis made this statement, proves that way back in 2021, how I interpreted the meaning of this odd statement is accurate. What TL meant by this statement was that she/Ad Hoc were not going to do anything to stop his provocation/aggression towards me. Instead, they expect me to indulge him his bad behaviour &/or unilaterally, physically, force him to stop his bad behaviour. That is tantamount to Ad Hoc deliberately fomenting a powder keg atmosphere between NM & HG and myself.

Apology Obsession is Proof of Said Red Herring What They Are Not Obsessed About is Indicative of Evil Discrimination

Ad Hoc employees and its solicitor/barrister altogether have shown what seems like an obsession over the fact that way back in 2021 I refused to accept NM’s apology. I believe this is another red herring. Here is evidence of how fixated these people are on the fact that I did not accept that apology,

“The Defendant refused to accept Nick Martin’s apology”

“ Nick apologised to Shina for making comments that Shina thought were racist comments. Shina did not accept the apology”

“ ..I believe that Nick apologised for his part in the incident but that you refused his apology”

Let’s Put this Apology Obsession into Its Evil Racist Context.
It could not be clearer to me that these people are commenting this much about my refusal to accept NM’s apology because they believe my refusal ought to be interpreted as a blotch on my character. That is egregious enough but the full context within which this was taking place reveals that this is pure evil discrimination. Let me explain.
(A) Ad Hoc’s race based discrimination is why, Harriet Grove, who deserves to be issued with a warning, has not issued with a warning.
(B) Instead I was issued with a totally unjustified warning. However, Ad Hoc’s discrimination is so vile and evil it not only believes (A) & (B) ought to be viewed as non-discriminatory appropriate conduct but also believes I should be faulted for not accepting NM’s apology. This type of racism from Ad Hoc is especially reprehensible, vile and evil.

Aspects of this three year long imbroglio that they are not commenting on at all is indicative of further evilness of Ad Hoc’s racism. They are not commenting on the fact that NM caused me to be scalded with boiling hot tea. They are not commenting on the fact that NM pinned a ‘Grow Up’ note on my door. They are not commenting on the fact that NM installed a camera in the kitchen with the aim of spying on me. They are not commenting on the fact that NM caused me to be physically assaulted with a chair etc etc. Can You Recognise This Significant Pattern Here?
There has never ever been any evidence that I have ever been provocative or aggressive towards others but there is enough evidence of NM and HG subjecting me to repeated acts of provocation/aggression. The evidence shows that I kept having to react against aggressive provocation from this duo. There is enough overwhelming evidence that proves this salient fact but despite that it is I, the innocent black person, and not aggressive Nick Martin or Harriet Grove, that has been taken to court by Ad Hoc as the person that deserves to be evicted and made to pay £12,855 court costs to Ad Hoc. Meanwhile the provocative aggressive caucasian guardians - Nick Martin and Harriet Grove - have, to the best of my knowledge been left unpunished. Racism best explains this incontrovertible discrimination. I challenge anyone to come up with a more credible explanation of this state of affairs.
Why Ad Hoc Wants to Evict Me is Telling – I Am Being Evicted For Expressing An Opinion – I Am Not Being Evicted for Treating Any Guardian Badly If Ad Hoc is to evict me at all as a result of this two year long unfolding matter you would think it would be because Ad Hoc has become aware of incontrovertible evidence of my violating Ad Hoc’s Clause 5.8 as a result of an interaction between other guardians and myself. But you would be wrong. Largely, because I keep being harassed by NM &/or HG, I, again, effectively, let Ad Hoc/TL know that there could be legal consequences for the race based discriminatory manner with which it is managing this matter. Put in other words, I expressed an opinion. That opinion is what Ad Hoc has stated is the reason why it plans to to evict me, this aspect is summarised below.

In Retaliation for Me Asking Ad Hoc to Stop Subjecting Me to Two Years Long Racism It Serves Me with Eviction Notice

TL’s and PT’s refusal to curtail the over two years long aggression of both NM and HG towards me - maybe by moving either of them to a room away from me in another building within the complex &/or by evicting either of them - is a main reason why I was compelled to author the email message showing immediately below,

Reading this ‘How Am I?’ email proves that it is self-explanatory. Even though this email is why Ad Hoc wants to evict me I wholeheartedly stand by every word of this email. In response to this email Ad Hoc sent me the email message that is shown immediately below - it is a message letting me know I am to be evicted.

These two documents prove that Ad Hoc applied to court for permission to evict me as retaliation because I complained about the continuing direct and indirect effects of the two years long and continuing race based discrimination that Ad Hoc itself is making me endure.

The Effect of That 2021 Letter of Concern Formal Warning Is Not Benign - It Unleashed A Three Years Long Period of Repeated Provocation/ Aggression From Nick Martin & Harriet Grove The main reason why I sent that ‘How Am I?’ email is because in about three years aggressive attacks from Nick Martin and Harriet Grove have never ever stopped. My existence in the past three years has been akin to living for about three years in a state of continuous mental torture because I never know when NM or HG will launch another act of provocation/aggressive that Ad Hoc will again ignore. The aforementioned Ad Hoc clause 5.8 acknowledges the possibility of a guardian employing passive aggression to cause discomfort to other guardians. As in, Ad Hoc knows that such a phenomenon as passive aggression exists. Contrary to what Ad Hoc/TL might believe, if Ad Hoc/TL issues me with a formal warning, Ad Hoc/TL are obligated to justify said formal warning - at the bare minimum Ad Hoc should justify/explain why it has issued such a warning if I ask for a justification/explanation. Discrimination is unlawful in the U.K - a licensor/landlord that issues a licensee/tenant an unjustified formal warning is guilty of discrimination. Ad Hoc/TL never justified why I was issued with the aforementioned Letter of Concern formal warning. More importantly, that discriminatory formal warning is, significantly, the root cause of why NM and HG have been encouraged/emboldened to continue to subject me to additional provocation/aggression for about three years. I had also accused TL of having subjected me to vile and reprehensible racism. Neither Ad Hoc, TL or PT ever denied this serious accusation - that is unreasonable, especially when it is juxtaposed with both the formal warning that Ad Hoc is refusing to justify and the fact that Ad Hoc kept refusing to stop NM and HG from continuing to harass me. With all that being the back ground imagine how I felt when the person that I had pretty much - very credibly - accused of being the racist that was causing me to be continually harassed by NM and HG asked me How are you? That is Trina Lewis being passive aggressive.

For TL to refuse - for over three years - to utter a single word to justify why she issued me with a formal warning and refuse to utter a single word of denial when I accused her of subjecting me to vile and reprehensible racism but then ask me how I am is wholly inappropriate. That is TL employing passive aggression to pretend that she cares for me when what she is really doing is attempting to employ passive aggression as part of her attempt to normalise how her racial discrimination towards me is causing me trauma. This passive aggression of TL is provocation and it is why I authored and sent the email message reproduced above.

AFTER Ad Hoc started court action to evict me, ……. Yet another act of aggression from Nick Martin, ….

NOT THE FIRST TIME …. NOT THE SECOND TIME … BUT THE THIRD TIME … NICK MARTIN IS VIDEO RECORDING ME …. BUT HE IS NOT BEING EVICTED … IT IS ME, THE INNOCENT BLACK PERSON, THAT IS BEING EVICTED

Way Back in 2022 Nonsensically NM Insisted that It Is So Important that the Kitchen Door Needs to be Closed All the Time Recently that Is No Longer the Case Because … His Aggression Plans Have Changed … He Has Now Decided Spying On Me Is More Important! Around 11/3/24, For the Third Time Nick Martin is Video Recording Me

As detailed earlier no matter how nakedly provocative and stupid NM’s conduct towards me is Trina Lewis always indulged him. That is why way back in 2022 when NM made the obviously bogus claim that I disturb him if the kitchen door is not closed when I am in the kitchen - Trina Lewis decided the kitchen door must always be closed when I am in the kitchen. It did not seem strange to TL that NM is the only guardian who has an issue when I am in the kitchen. TL also did not think it was provocative at all that NM had complained about my breathing in the kitchen and the list goes on. Harriet Grove’s room also shares a wall with the kitchen and yet even she has never complained about my conduct in the kitchen. And she and I have lived in Kenwith Lodge together longer than NM has lived here. If the kitchen door being open disturbs NM that means he must want the door to his own room closed whenever I am in the kitchen, right? After all, if NM is really so sensitive about keeping noise from the kitchen contained in the kitchen, by having the kitchen door closed whenever I am in the kitchen - it makes no sense to have the door of his (NM’s) own room open while I am in the kitchen, right(?) So for a year or two I have been closing the door whenever I am in the kitchen. Guess why all of a sudden, after the big fuss this racist imbecile made about needing the kitchen door closed so he will not be disturbed , he has recently switched to keeping the door to his room open all the time? Remember that recently he had to remove the camera he unilaterally installed in the kitchen so as to spy on my and there was the time he was video recording me making a cup of tea. He recently, decided on a new third attempt to spy on me while I am in the kitchen. Please view the video immediately below.

TL’s and PT’s refusal to curtail the over two years long aggression of both NM and HG towards me - maybe by moving either of them to a room away from me in another building within the complex &/or by evicting either of them - is a main reason why I was compelled to author the email message showing immediately below,

This is a video of NM keeping the door to his room ajar so as to be able to video record/ spy on me going in and out of the kitchen - I noticed this in March 2024; about two weeks after Ad Hoc had received a court’s legal permission to evict me. All of a sudden NM no longer needs to close his door to minimise noise from the kitchen that supposedly disturbs him whenever I am in the kitchen - instead his latest act of provocation/aggression is to leave the door of his room open, despite how this will let noise in, because spying on me is his new priority. This is the kind of psychological torment I have been putting up with for about three years. Nick Martin is a racist imbecile that for about three years has relentlessly continued to provoke/ act aggressively towards me. Time and time again Ad Hoc has encouraged this and in response to me asking for this to be stopped Ad Hoc asked a court for permission to evict me - not Nick Martin.

Ad Hoc Submits Desperate
‘Let’s Hope the Judge is As Racist As We Are’
Evidence to Court

IN COURT I ACCUSED AD HOC, HARRIET GROVE & NICK MARTIN OF WORKING HAND IN HAND TO SUBJECT ME TO RACISM. YOU WOULD THINK AD HOC WOULD - NOT - SUBMIT EVIDENCE TO COURT THAT 100% PROVES MY ACCUSATION IS TRUE!

To evict me Ad Hoc took me to court. The defence that I submitted to court explicitly asserted that over almost three years the collective conduct of Ad Hoc’s employees Trina Lewis & Paul Thomson and two guardians, Harriet Grove & Nick Martin, is tantamount to four people working hand in hand with each other to subject me to racial discrimination. Simon Wright, the third collaborating Ad Hoc employee became involved from around September 2023. With that being the case you would think that in response to my defence Ad Hoc would most definitely - not - submit to court evidence that clearly proves that Ad Hoc is accepting of Harriet Grove subjecting me to what is indisputable discrimination. You would be completely wrong. It turns out Harriet Grove had audio recorded a provocative confrontation that she instigated against me, this is summarised immediately below.

IT IS PLAUSIBLE THAT AD HOC & HARRIET GROVE PLANNED THIS CONFRONTATION.

Several months earlier Ad Hoc’s Trina Lewis and Paul Thomson had falsely accused me of being aggressive because that is what racists are known to do to innocent black people. At that time I had embarrassed these two racists by more or less proving that they had falsely accused me of being aggressive. Ever since then and a long time before this confrontation with Harriet Grove took place I had suspected that Ad Hoc was desperate to obtain evidence of me being aggressive towards others. HARRIET GROVE SO CONVENIENTLY RECORDED THE CONFRONTATION THAT SHE HERSELF INSTIGATED. During the time of the confrontation I do not remember Harriet Grove ever holding her smart phone in her hand. It is most likely she planned the aggressive confrontation, pressed the record button on her smart phone and then started the aggressive confrontation when I appeared. Ad Hoc submitted a transcript of the confrontation to court. I cannot emphasis the following point enough - Ad Hoc unequivocally submitted this transcript to court as supposed evidence of my bad behaviour. I will let you decide if the transcript is evidence of that or, most definitely, evidence of Harriet Grove treating me in a discriminatory manner.THIS IS AD HOC & HARRIET GROVE SELF-CERTIFYING THEMSELVES AS RACISTS. Because this confrontation was instigated - after - I had asked these people to stop subjecting me to racial discrimination that makes this discrimination racial. There is hardly any difference between Ad Hoc stupidly presenting this transcript to court and Ad Hoc & Harriet Grove proclaiming

‘Look at us we are not just racists we are stupid racists’

SOME CONTEXT: Please remember I had already informed Ad Hoc and Harriet Grove that I view their discriminatory conduct towards me as racism. With that being the case all Ad Hoc and HG needed to do, to so easily avoid self-certifying themselves as racist discriminators, is simply - not - subject me to any kind of discrimination.

The following is my reality. Imagine this reality of mine. You, Guardian X, are a minority and one of six guardians that use the same kitchen and the bins in that kitchen. You prove that you do what you can to be a ‘good guardian’ by emptying the bins much more than others - the last record of how often guardians emptied bins shows that you emptied the bins 8 times out of the last 17 times any guardian emptied any bin. Of the six guardians that are meant to empty bins there is at least one guardian that seems to have never ever emptied a bin before. Because each guardian lives a completely separate life to other guardians it is simply completely ridiculous for any guardian to claim she/he knows that any particular guardian fills up any of the two bins more than other guardians - the only way to know that would be for a person to camp out in the kitchen 24/7 while keeping a tally of how much each guardian puts rubbish in either bins. Similarly, it is completely absurd for any guardian to claim to know how long any particular guardian is at home or away, unless you are stalking your fellow guardians. Despite that, out of the blue, one day guardian Harriet Grove proceeds to accuse you of filling up the bins more than other guardians. She claims she knows this is true because she claims she has been stalking you and that is why she knows you are at home more than other guardians and she claims she knows that while you are home all you are doing is filling the bins. And with that she orders you to empty the bins - she claims it is irrelevant that you already empty the bins way more than other guardians. She asserts that it is appropriate to order you to empty the bins because others should not have to clean up after you. You, naturally, react negatively to Harriet Grove’s wholly inappropriate provocative behaviour towards you. Harriet Grove’s aggression towards you only ends because in order to avoid her you leave the kitchen quicker than you intended. As you are rushing back to your room, Harriet Grove is hurling insults at you as she follows you halfway to your room - the last thing you remember is her calling you a ‘fucking arsehole’ as you entered your room.

It gets worse. The landlord’s representative, Trina Lewis, becomes aware of this aggressive attack that Harriet Grove subjected you to and decides that it is you - not Harriet Grove - that is at fault. That is why Ad Hoc submitted the transcript showing below to court. Because Harriet Grove is a racist she did not launch this attack against her fellow caucasian, I think that guardian is a Tiffany K, that seemingly had never ever emptied a bin.
Instead she attacked me , the black person, that had been emptying the bins SO MUCH MORE THAN EVERY OTHER GUARDIAN, … INCLUDING …. WAIT FOR IT ….. HARRIET GROVE HERSELF.

WHATEVER I DO IS NEVER GOOD ENOUGH FOR RACISTS AD HOC & HARRIET GROVE I Had Always Cleaned All Communal Areas Whenever It Was My Turn. After the Bin Incident I Stopped Bothering. Why Should I Not Stop! In Return For Emptying Bins Much More Than Others Ad Hoc Expected Me , A Black Person, To Obey When a Caucasian Ordered Me To Empty Bins Even More!

AS A RESULT OF HARRIET GROVE’S CANCEROUS NARCISSISTIC RACISM ALL OTHER GUARDIANS THAT I SHARE CLEANING DUTIES WITH SUFFER TOO

This particular act of aggression of Harriet Grove and how Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc supported her aggression caused me to stop emptying any bins at all. Eventually, I started using my own personal bins. In effect, the corrosive and racist behaviour of these two people ended up negatively affecting all people involved - how often I was emptying the bins was of benefit to all involved but not anymore. For over three years I have been coping with other acts of racism that Harriet Grove and Nick Martin have been subjecting me to and each time Trina Lewis/Ad Hoc have encouraged this duo. This has had the general effect of making me feel that no matter what I do I can never win with these people - and that in turn has had the effect of me, generally, thinking there is no need for me to attempt to expend energy towards what benefits all guardians as a whole. Me not particularly bothering about cleaning communal areas came AFTER I realised that Ad Hoc and these two guardians were , in effect, collaborating together to trample all over my human rights. Why should I when these people keep causing me trauma by consciously and repeatedly subjecting me to racism? Meanwhile, the racist Harriet Grove has been going around complaining to other guardians about how I do not empty bins, complaining that I do not bother enough about cleaning communal areas etc. However, deviously, Harriet Grove deliberately fails to tell guardians that it is her and Trina Lewis’ racism that adversely affects my inclination to team play at Kenwith Lodge.

WITHOUT FANFARE LOOK AT HOW WHAT I WAS DOING WAS BENEFITING ALL GUARDIANS.

Of course emptying bins is not particularly significant. But not emptying bins when they are full does negatively affect all guardians. I was emptying bins 50% of the time, without drawing attention to how this was benefitting all 6 guardians - including that one guardian that never ever emptied bins - I was being the best one can expect of a guardian.

The Racist Intention of Trina Lewis & Harriet Grove. These two trailer trash racists were hoping that no one would come to know that it is their racism that is negatively impacting my relationship with other guardians at Kenwith Lodge. These two vile racists would love to convince others that I am the problem. How am I the problem? I, the guardian that was emptying bins, on average, half the time, is the problem because I refused to obey HG’s orders and because I refuse to put up with being called a fucking arsehole by Harriet Grove? I had already accused Harriet Grove of being a racist and then AFTER I had accused her so, here she is calling me a fucking arsehole because she is not happy that I refused to obey her order to empty the bins - because my having already emptied the bins 8 times of 17 times is not good enough for her? I mean that does not look anything like harassment &/or discrimination &/or racism, does it(?). Is this even remotely an appropriate way for one guardian to treat another?

I Am White! He Is Black. This is Going To Be Easy Racism That No One Will Ever Know About

Trina Lewis is paid to be a representative of Ad Hoc. That means she is obligated to act as an unbiased person that does her best and what is reasonable to promote tranquility amongst guardians. Instead of doing that because she is a vile and reprehensible rabid racist she is in full support of Harriet Grove’s discriminatory conduct towards me. I find several aspects about trailer trash racists like HG & TL to be truly amazing - amazing in a really bad way. One such aspect is the fact that these racists never seem to think about the possibility that they themselves might end up paying a price as a result of their rabid desire to cause harm to a minority like myself

Trina Lewis Said She Abuses Her Husband. That Does Not Mean She Should Expect She Can So Easily Abuse Me Too.

Trina Lewis said she abuses her husband. Maybe TL is of the opinion that because she gets away with abusing her own husband that means I too will put up with her abuse. No, I do not fucking think so!

Transcript Evidence

After HG’s narcissistic aggression had resulted in Trina Lewis giving me a formal warning in 2021 I had made it clear to her (HG) that I wanted nothing to do with her. That should have been cause for her to simply leave me in peace. But I was never going to be afforded such peace in the space where I pay rent to live in peace because Harriet Grove is an aggressive narcissistic racist that simply cannot help herself nor can she protect herself from her own profound stupidity.

The transcript shown below is all the evidence needed to prove that narcissistic Harriet Grove is an aggressive racist. HARRIET GROVE THINKS THE WORLD REVOLVES AROUND HER MEDIOCRE TRUCK DRIVER GARDEN VARIETY LIFE. She simply cannot solitarily live her life while leaving others to similarly live their lives in peace.

Please look at the image showing immediately below

It is a photograph of a note attached to the door of the kitchen that each guardian was meant to use to write their name each time she/he emptied either of the two types of bins in the kitchen used by Harriet Grove, myself - and four other guardians. With the aim being to create a record of how often each guardian empties the bins. I believe it was Harriet Grove herself who devised this system of having such a note on the kitchen door. I took this photograph of this note on the kitchen door on the day Harriet Grove decided to, yet again, instigate another one of her narcissistic aggressive confrontation with me - the transcript of that confrontation is shown below. The transcript is evidence that Harriet Grove simply cannot live in peace and leave me to live my life in peace.

TRANSCRIPT IS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT MY ACCUSATION AGAINST AD HOC IS ABSOLUTELY VALID

My accusation is that since 2021, for over three years, Ad Hoc has been subjecting me to discrimination and said discrimination credibly is race based discrimination. I believe said discrimination started with Ad Hoc subjecting me to a race based hate crime. My accusation includes the assertion that Ad Hoc has been employing two guardians, Nick Martin and Harriet Grove, as its agents to subject me to said race based discrimination - I ASSERT THAT FOR OVER THREE YEARS AD HOC HAS BEEN IGNORING/ OUTRIGHT ENCOURAGING THE AGGRESSIVE CONDUCT OF NICK MARTIN & HARRIET GROVE TOWARDS ME. This discrimination has been continuing for over three years and I have curated, as summarised here, several pieces of evidence that prove said discrimination. However, of all this evidence, I believe that Ad Hoc’s ‘Let’s Hope the Judge is As Racist As We Are’ evidence, that Ad Hoc actually submitted to court, represent the best proof that my aforementioned accusation is absolutely infallible. What lies immediately below is the same transcript but with my comments in red

TRANSCRIPT

“ I have just asked you to do the bins but ‘ve been home all week”

Who the fuck is Harriet Grove to tell me to do anything?! You almost could not make this up! It is almost beyond my comprehension that this piece of garbage would think it is a good idea to ask me to do anything. Harriet Grove suffers from a supreme form of narcissistic racism. Maybe trailer trash like Trina Lewis and Harriet Grove are so used to being indulged by weakwilled idiotic men they assume they can walk all over any man.

I am minding my own business not bothering anyone and along comes an overweight narcissistic racist scumbag called Harriet

Grove in her cheap-looking bright polyester clothes thinking it is a good idea to order me to do anything because she is white and I am black! I do not fucking think so!


 “ Ok , so you are not going to do the bins?”
No you stupid twat, I most definitely am not going to do the bins on your command! Harriet Grove must be high on crack cocaine to think I would ever do what she orders me to do.

ME: “….. Look at that sheet on the door. How many times has my name appeared there?”
The note on the door that proved I empty the bins 50% of the time made no difference to HG because her conduct towards me had absolutely nothing to do with whether it made sense to demand that I empty the bins. HG’s conduct was purely about being maliciously racist.

“ You’re home all the time”

“ You’re home all the time”
How on earth could this trailer trash idiot know if I had been home all day or not?

“ You can’t expect people to not be home and clean up after you"
Of all the comments of this transcript this is the one that makes my blood boil the most. I was cleaning up the bins way more than all other guardians - and all of those five guardians are white guardians including Harriet Grove. Much earlier, I had informed HG that I view her conduct towards me as racism. Subsequently, she ignores this warning and simply - because she thinks she can get away with her racism - proceeds to pretty much label, at the time, the only black guardian that she lives with as a dirty person that others have to clean up after! That to me is racism of a specificity that I find veritably offensive. Of course others have to clean up after me, after all having a dark skin equates to me being dirtier than than those of a lighter caucasian hue. This gluttonous trailer trash racist Harriet Grove who almost makes me throw up every time I set eyes on her overweight lardarse in her bright cheap-looking polyester clothes because she actually looks dirty thinks I deserve to be unjustly accused of being dirty! Of all guardians that use that kitchen I probably produce the least amount of rubbish. I do not like cooking - any meal that takes more than 20 minutes to prepare and is just a bit ‘too complicated’ to prepare, I ain’t preparing it! My go to favourite meal, including for breakfast, is a salad - minimal rubbish is left over from buying raw vegetables to make a salad. My go to meal if I want a hot meal is usually heated up frozen vegetables - minimal rubbish is left over from that too. I suspect that compared to others, I buy so much less food. That might be why my fridge is one of those little knee high fridges. Does all that seem like someone who is filling up the bins more than other guardians because I generate a lot of rubbish(?) Compare that to Harriet Grove who has at least two fridges that are over six foot tall. This is a state of affairs that I find hard to wrap my mind around. If Harriet Grove living alone eats so much to the extent that she needs two big fridges what happens if she becomes part of a household with more people - will such a household require at least four or five big fridges? All Harriet Grove does all day is cook, bake and eat, That is why she is a vomit inducing dirty looking overweight narcissistic racist lardarse that is as tall as she is wide. Harriet Grove’s gluttonous overeating generates a lot of rubbish that always fills up the two bins quickly.

ME: “ I’m home all the time I’m the only one that’s home so what are you monitoring me or something”
HG: “Yes”
There you have it - Harriet Grove admits that she is stalking me!

ME: “You know I am home more than anyone else?
HG: “ I’m away in the truck 5 days a week”

ME: “Harriet telling us about her fucking life I don’t care whether you’re away on the moon I don’t want to hear it. Live your life let me live mine”

My fucking goodness! Way back in 2021 when HG first subjected me to that first aggressive confrontation it was clear from what she was snarling at me at the time that she is a bonafide malicious narcissist - for proof of this just read that first message that Nick Martin sent to me. Harriet Grove thinks the world revolves around her pathetic existence. Here she is again providing more proof that she is a narcissist. I mean why on earth does she think I want to know about her crummy life as a truck driver or how long she has been away working as a truck driver - what the fuck has that got to do with her and I living in the same building as guardians??? I mean, what HG was saying to me is wholly inappropriate but ‘appropriate’ if she were an abusive spouse talking to her abused husband. Remember Trina Lewis bizarrely stated that I deserved that formal warning because Harriet Grove’s aggression towards me was not worst than how she abuses her own husband. Well here is HG proving she is taking her cue from TL by relating to me as if I am her abused husband!



This transcript that Ad Hoc submitted to court did not include the part where HG said something along the lines of

‘I will tell Trina if you do not empty the bins now!’

That part of the transcript should be about here.-
“.. when you go to Trina with your ridiculous complaints take that sheet off the door and show it to her”
I suspect that Ad Hoc deliberately took that part out of the transcript.

One guardian threatening to report another guardian to Ad Hoc simply because of something as trivial as not emptying the bins on command is really odd, right? But not when you look at it from the perspective of HG knowing I had received that formal warning from Trina Lewis. This was HG twisting the knife because she is a cruel and disgusting narcissistic racist. And a fucking idiot. You see her thinking was similar to that other trailer trash racist idiot Trina Lewis - they both thought that having received that Letter of Concern would intimidate me and make me afraid of being evicted. HG really needs to get out more - never ever will I allow myself to be intimidated by the likes of an idiotic trailer trash gluttonous lardarse like Harriet Grove

“You, … I feel sorry for you”

“ I feel sorry for you”

I am 100% sure HG cannot really credibly explain why she feels sorry for me.

I believe this “I feel sorry for you” is a Freudian slip. What HG is really saying, inadvertently, goes something like this,

‘I feel sorry for you because you having totally blanked me for months must mean there is something wrong with you and not me - it could not possibly simply be because you find me repulsive and therefore prefer to avoid me like the plague’.

This is unadulterated narcissism plain and simple.
“ You’re abusive”
This was HG playing up to the audio recording that she knew she was capturing on her smartphone.

“I feel sorry for you”

ME: “And I feel sorry for you for being such a …. Narcissistic cancerous personality, that’s why I feel sorry for you”

ME: “ Why can’t you just not talk to me? No really why can’t you just live your life and let me live my life?”

HG: “ Um I have not spoken to you for months”
HG: “I’ve not spoken to you since you wrote those messages”

 This is Harriet Grove proving that she is a truly pathetic narcissist. What she said here proves this aggressive attack of hers had a lot to do with her acting out because her fragile ego cannot handle the fact that I had been avoiding her like the plague for months because to me she is persona non grata racist. Poor ‘not so little’ Harriet Grove cannot handle not being the centre of everyone’s world, fucking idiot!

BECAUSE HARRIET GROVE IS A INCURABLE NARCISSISTIC PIECE OF RACIST GARBAGE SHE IS MOANING BECAUSE SHE CANNOT HANDLE HOW I STOPPED TALKING TO HER FOR MONTHS. THIS IS TYPICAL BEHAVIOUR OF A PERSON THAT IS TRULY NARCISSISTIC. I STOPPED TALKING TO HARRIET GROVE BECAUSE SHE IS A DISGUSTING OVEREATING OVERWEIGHT RACIST SCUM OF THE EARTH. HERE SHE IS CRYING UP A RIVER BECAUSE I WAS AVOIDING HER BECAUSE HER PERSONALITY IS LIKE A PLAGUE THAT I WANTED TO AVOID AT ALL COSTS.

 HG: “ Look it is nothing. Look I know you think I’m a racist”

 Yeah, Harriet Grove is a racist and there is nothing like launching this kind of brainless aggressive attack against me to prove she is a racist! I mean the choice that confronted HG was so difficult it is like rocket science.

HG thought,…

‘My sh*t stirring narcissistic racism has already caused this guy to receive a formal warning that he does not deserve. What should I do next to prove to him I am not a racist? Here is what I will do. I will do the opposite of simply leaving him in peace. I will tell him I am stalking him. I will attempt to get him closer to possibly being evicted by threatening to report him to Ad Hoc if he does not obey my command to empty bins. Yeah, doing that will prove I am not a racist!’

HG: 2 Everything to do with you fucking asshole. Bye”

Conclusion

I challenge anyone to credibly make the argument that any part of what I said during this exchange with HG is not completely justified.

Every single word of what HG said during this incident was meant to be malicious provocation. I also challenge anyone to point out anything that Harriet Grove said in this transcript that is remotely appropriate.

At the time HG instigated this confrontation six guardians were using the upstairs kitchen, so six people were obligated to empty bins. From looking at the note reproduced above, Harriet Grove could see that of the last 6 times any guardian had emptied either of the two types of bins I had emptied the bins 4 times! The rest of the note actually showed that of 17 entries on that note I had emptied bins 8 times. Put in other words I was emptying bins way more than anyone else. Of those six guardians I remember at least one guardian that I believe had never ever emptied a bin - I cannot recall ever seeing her name written on this note on the kitchen door. Despite that I did not use that as an excuse to launch an aggressive confrontation against that guardian. Nor did HG see fit to instigate an aggressive confrontation against that person - instead the racist HG launched her aggression against me; the black person. Ad Hoc’s lawyers introduced this transcript to court by saying,

“The Claimant is aware that the Defendant had made allegations against two licensees of the Premises, namely, Harriet Grove (who asked him to follow the bin duty rota) … “

There is no fucking rota to follow! We were emptying bins randomly and voluntarily. That is fucking obvious from looking at the note! How is it a rota if I am emptying bins that much more than other guardians?

My decades of coming into contact with racists has taught me that they tend to be as racist as they are brainless. Ad Hoc submitting this transcript to court proves that point.

This note on the door was not indicative of a rota, rather it is indicative of a system that centred around guardians randomly and voluntarily emptying bins. Even if there was a rota system in place, there was enough information on that note for HG to know that by a wide margin I was the last guardian that deserved to be taken to task with regards to not emptying bins often enough! Put in other words, there is absolutely no justification for Harriet Grove to launch this aggressive confrontation against me. None whatsoever! HG knew that I avoid her like the plague, as is my right - so there was no justification for her to talk to me let alone subject me to this kind of aggressive provocation. What this transcript represents is absolute proof of HG’s habit of subjecting me to provocative aggression. Despite all that Ad Hoc submitted this transcript to court as what it sees as evidence of my, not HG’s, aggressive behaviour! That is why I characterise this evidence as Ad Hoc’s

Despite all that Ad Hoc submitted this transcript to court as what it sees as evidence of my, not HG’s, aggressive behaviour! That is why I characterise this evidence as Ad Hoc’s

‘Let’s Hope the Judge is As Racist As We Are’

…. and thereby we hope the judge will view this as evidence of his aggression and not Harriet Grove’s narcissistic aggression.

Harriet Grove Ordered Me to Empty Bins Within Context that Includes the Following.

(A) I was falsely accused of being aggressive and issued with a formal warning because I complained about HG having instigated a narcissistic provocative confrontation against me. TL bizarrely claimed that I deserved the formal warning because how HG treated me is no worse than how TL treats her husband. That is racism.

(B) I had explicitly stated the obvious - that the type of discrimination committed by TL was likely to embolden HG to continue to harass me and that is exactly what happened. (The transcript is proof that HG’s conduct towards me is wholly inappropriate, and definitely not conduct that should occur between guardians. It is conduct that one would expect to occur between spouses that are in an abusive relationship. Put in other words, this transcript is proof that Harriet Grove was indeed encouraged to continue to subject me to provocative aggression because of what Trina Lewis said about how she (TL) abuses her own husband - HG behaved as if she had accepted TL’s permission to harass me as if I was married to her (HG).Imagine the thought of being married to Harriet Grove, … I think I am going to throw up!

(C) In the ensuing chaotic environment that Ad Hoc/Trina Lewis had deliberately created, as reflected by (A), I had to do my best to let HG know that I was not going to be intimidated by her harassment. After all, I have every right to - employ a tempered means - to resist the aggressive harassment of an agent of the landlord who the landlord has given permission to harass me. What Ad Hoc and HG were doing is tantamount to violating my human rights - I have the right to live in peace. With regards to the transcript showing above, I completely stand by every word I uttered in response to HG’s provocation. HG was being maliciously provocative and my reaction to her gross provocation is natural.

It Is Surreal to Me that Ad Hoc Submitted this Transcript to Court , Supposedly, As Proof of My Bad Behaviour Towards Harriet Grove

Ad Hoc denies subjecting me to racism. However, Ad Hoc believes I, a black person, should have obeyed the totally unreasonable command of HG, who is caucasian - that seems very much like the racism that I am accusing Ad Hoc of subjecting me to , does it not?

This only makes sense from the perspective of Ad Hoc having adopted a

‘Let’s hope the judge is as racist as we are’ strategy.

More than anything else this transcript is incontrovertible evidence of Ad Hoc & Harriet Grove working in concert with each other to trample all over my human rights. I believe that a judge would have to be grossly incompetent &/or tremendously biased against me to not conclude that by drawing attention to this transcript Ad Hoc is self-certifying as a racist entity.